The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Tough
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

why is everyone insane except me??

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Tough
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/25/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 431 times Debate No: 79055
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

i can put ink, in a closed bottle Water, if i close my eyes and believe it hard enough, but when i open them and i see there is no ink in the water all this Means is that my powers go away when i open my eyes

just because you cant do it dosnt mean you should call me crazy
Tough

Con

Pro would have you believe that everyone is insane except for himself but this is not at all the truth.

It would be insane for someone who know that everyone except himself/herself was insane to create a debate where the winner is decided solely by the votes of insane people's verdicts on the debate where only one of the parties was as insane as they are and could effortlessly connect to their insane minds on a level that a sane minded individual never could.

Thus either Pro is too, insane, or there are indeed sane people other than Pro.

Checkmate.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

they are insane because they know they cant do it so they try to tell me i cant do it...
Tough

Con

And you are insane for thinking insane people would vote for you when I'm as insane as them but you are not.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

is it insane for an insane man to say he is reading these Words on a screen?

you insanity is in contrast with you hating me just becasue you cant do true magic
Tough

Con

Last round made no sense so I'm not going to rebut or even recognize it as a valid debate round. Thanks.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
it is not a troll debate, unless religious people are trolls?
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: asi14// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Con (Arguments). This is officially the worst debate I have ever seen. Kudos on con's side for trying to muddle through the muddiness that was the pro's arguments.

[*Reason for non-removal*] While the vote is vague, the debate itself is a troll debate, and therefore not moderated.
************************************************************************
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
you dont see true magic often.
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
True
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
on the contrary, you couldnt look away!
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
When you're eyes were closed, millions of people ignored this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Sarra 1 year ago
Sarra
vi_spexToughTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: As they say, every genius is a tad bit crazy. For other voters: if you are just reading surface messages of vi_spex, you'll miss out. I believe vi_spex is using an analogy referring to the Schr?dinger's Cat Paradox, then using the analogy as a metaphor for himself vs. other people (insanity). vi_spex does not care about punctuation or capitalization, so sadly vi_spex will almost always lose on grammar :( and Con starts a sentence with a conjunction, has one extra comma, four missing commas, and one missing semicolon. Con has less grammar mistakes.
Vote Placed by asi14 1 year ago
asi14
vi_spexToughTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This is officially the worst debate I have ever seen. Kudos on con's side for trying to muddle through the muddiness that was the pro's arguments.