The Instigator
mmmmmmmmmm
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
Zack28180
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

why we should not have zoos

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
mmmmmmmmmm
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/19/2016 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 480 times Debate No: 86923
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

mmmmmmmmmm

Pro

I believe that we should ban zoos because they do a lot of harm. First of all it is a lot of money to care for all the animals. The zoo has to pay for its new habitat, the food and water and they need medical care sometimes as well. It is hard to pay for that so then the animals wont be getting what they need because the zoo cant afford it. Second of all the animals Cant learn to hunt, the food is just set in front of them. If animals are born into the zoo they have know experience with the outdoor world. Finally they cant protect themselves. Again because they have never had to deal with problems like that. THat is why I believe we should not have zoos!
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid 1 year ago
diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid
Zoo = School
Animals = Kids

Now go re-read and vote for me in the comments.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Hylian_3000 11 months ago
Hylian_3000
mmmmmmmmmmZack28180Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession
Vote Placed by diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid 1 year ago
diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid
mmmmmmmmmmZack28180Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: when faced with an overwhelming display of logic and reason, con did the wise thing and surrendered to avoid further animosity and bloodshed. Who knows how much carnage would have resulted if this had been allowed to continue. As a result, no animals were harmed in this debate. Con is a true, and glorious, Frenchman. Viva la Resolution!
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
mmmmmmmmmmZack28180Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided an argument. Con conceded defeat.