The Instigator
xxx200
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
EBaldofsky
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

will atheism ever be a worldwide philosophy ?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
xxx200
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/22/2012 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 652 times Debate No: 21395
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)

 

xxx200

Pro

atheism= belief that there is no god.

worldwide philosophy= everybody will be atheist.

i will argue pro.

first round acceptance.
EBaldofsky

Con

I hope to see your side and hope you can understand my beliefs.
Debate Round No. 1
xxx200

Pro

atheism will be an worldwide philosophy because we have a strategy for spreading atheism.

our strategy of is the following:

1] we should use the same tactics which organized religions use.

2] we will create an organization first. then our org. will provide daily necessary things to poor, take care of orphans only in the name of science not in the name of god. there we will provide world class education to kids, make them truly scientific thinker.

3] we will invade colleges and universities and target young mind to bring them on the path of science. we will provide them jobs in our organization.


4] any body who will renounce their god/religion to become atheist will get special privileges beside these things.


5] then we will go to media,buy time slots and air our atheist programme. we will regularly debunk so called religious fanatics.


6] we will lobby in the parliament to make a truly seculer society.

now that's how atheism will be an worldwide philosophy.

con what do you think about it? will it be feasible?
what are the resistance that can come in the way?
EBaldofsky

Con

EBaldofsky forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
xxx200

Pro

what is your argument?
EBaldofsky

Con

EBaldofsky forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
xxx200

Pro

xxx200 forfeited this round.
EBaldofsky

Con

EBaldofsky forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
xxx200

Pro

xxx200 forfeited this round.
EBaldofsky

Con

EBaldofsky forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Doulos1202 5 years ago
Doulos1202
lol at #4 special priviledges.....really give someone candy in hopes that they change their mind about something.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
If he had said yes, I would have the easiest two word rebuttle.

You can't make it worldwide if it invovles everyone. I refuse to believe in atheism. Thus, the pro fails.

God that would've been such an easy debate.
Posted by Zealous1 5 years ago
Zealous1
ROFL no. I don't know how to argue against this without getting into the classic atheism vs. Christianity thing.

By the way Pro, you have a HUGE bop.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
What do you define world-wide as? Something that everyone on Earth believes in?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Nur-Ab-Sal 5 years ago
Nur-Ab-Sal
xxx200EBaldofskyTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Pro for Con's forfeit. Spelling and grammar goes to Con. Convincing arguments goes to Pro because he was the only one to make an argument.