The Instigator
ProphecyNoob
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
The-Voice-of-Truth
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points

will ferrel founded the u.s in 1863

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
The-Voice-of-Truth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/12/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,358 times Debate No: 69911
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

ProphecyNoob

Pro

he did i swear
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

I accept. I would like to thank my opponent for hosting this debate. I understand that I am taking the stance that Will Ferrel did NOT found America in 1863. Good luck, and may the best man win.
Debate Round No. 1
ProphecyNoob

Pro

Um yeah. Check this out=living proof. http://www.weltbranding.com...

It obviously shows that in the beginning of the united states there was nothing but black and he had an idea and created it
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

REBUTTALS:

Um yeah. Check this out=living proof.
(See link)

The source provided is a picture of Will Ferrel and a black background. There is also a faded picture of his face next to the real Will Ferrel. In roder for the picture to be online, it has to de digital. Digital photgraphy was not invented until 1996 [1]; argumentum e silentio fallacy


It obviously shows that in the beginning of the united states there was nothing but black and he had an idea and created it

There was no black space before America was dicovered. How do you explain paintings from the 1200s?


The resolution is that Will Ferrel founded America, not created America due to an idea. That argument is irrelevent; non sequitur fallacy.

ARGUMENTS:

There is historical documentation that Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492. [2]

http://www.bu.edu...;
http://www.historyisaweapon.com...;
Debate Round No. 2
ProphecyNoob

Pro

thats what they want you to think. will ferrel was god for america duh
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

REBUTTALS:


thats what they want you to think.

Who is 'they'? Where is your proof? This whole debate, you have been unable to fulfill your BoP, while I have.

will ferrel was god for america duh

Again, where is your proof? You have no evidence to support your claims. Your use of the word 'duh' is insinuating that either I am dumb, or that I am not competent enough to debate this topic. That is an ad hominem logical fallacy.



ARGUMENTS:

No new arguments; it is the final round and there is no need for any.


May I point out that my opponent used 3 logical fallacies in this debate and did not fulfill his BoP, while I did in the second round.

Thank you for reading, and please vote.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by ProphecyNoob 1 year ago
ProphecyNoob
no its only under the funny section for fun
Posted by Liberals 1 year ago
Liberals
ProphecyNoob, was this a troll?
Posted by EthanTheAce 2 years ago
EthanTheAce
he was not born yet http://www.biography.com...
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
So I can screw with trolls such as this guy.
Posted by josiepink13 2 years ago
josiepink13
Why is this even being debated?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Zack95 2 years ago
Zack95
ProphecyNoobThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Tied debate, I feel Con was not familiar with Pro's sarcasm and failed to understand his reasoning. I also feel that since pro stayed in the argument he deserves conduct points.
Vote Placed by Robert_Weiler 2 years ago
Robert_Weiler
ProphecyNoobThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made no real arguments, just a baseless, and rather odd, assertion.
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
ProphecyNoobThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to make any reasonable arguments.