The Instigator
frenchmoose
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
Korashk
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

windsheild wipers are living things too you know..

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Korashk
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/17/2010 Category: Education
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,962 times Debate No: 11771
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (17)
Votes (4)

 

frenchmoose

Pro

you people are ignorant i guess :/
Korashk

Con

This is a typical windshield wiper:

http://tinyurl.com...

They are made of plastic and/or metal. These are not organic substances and in their current form are not living or ever were.

The resolution is negated.
Debate Round No. 1
frenchmoose

Pro

-I would like to point out that himler has not stated any evidence towards whether windsheild wipers are organic or not..-

-This makes him useless....-

-My toast just popped up so I guess its time to feast-

-I have returned and have come up with something to say.. windshield wipers move without human interference and also like to share there pie.-

-I await my opponents response-
Korashk

Con

///-I would like to point out that himler has not stated any evidence towards whether windsheild wipers are organic or not..-///

Information that is generally known usually does not require a source to be contended. I will however provide a source for this information [1].
~

///-I have returned and have come up with something to say.. windshield wipers move without human interference and also like to share there pie.-///

I contend that windshield wipers don't move without outside interference. The car must be on for them to function properly and that does not happen unless it is turned on. This required an outside influence independent from the wiper itself.

[1] http://www.madehow.com...
Debate Round No. 2
frenchmoose

Pro

-"Information that is generally known usually does not require a source to be contended."- to this I have a video...

-"I will however provide a source for this information [1]."- No where in that source did it state that windshields are non organic things.-

-"I contend that windshield wipers don't move without outside interference"- If you didn't this would not be a debate.-

-"The car must be on for them to function properly and that does not happen unless it is turned on."- The car does not have to be on for them to move. debates not about weather they work properly.-

-"This required an outside influence independent from the wiper itself."- (refer to video)-

-My opponent has failed to mention anything about how a windshield wiper can be non organic but still share pie.-

- I await my opponents relentless assault-
Korashk

Con

///No�where�in�that�source�did�it�state�that�windshields�are�non�organic�things.///

No�explicitly,�but�because�metal�and�plastic�are�not�living�things�neither�are�windshield�wipers.
~

///The�car�does�not�have�to�be�on�for�them�to�move.�debates�not�about�weather�they�work�properly.///

They�do�require�an�outside�influence;�a�point�that�I�touched�on.�Windshield�wipers�can�not�move�without�outside�influence.
~

///My�opponent�has�failed�to�mention�anything�about�how�a�windshield�wiper�can�be�non�organic�but�still�share�pie.///

Windshield�wipers�can�not�share�pie,�an�extraordinary�claim�made�without�evidence�can�be�dismissed�without�evidence.

I�rest�my�case,�vote�Con.
Debate Round No. 3
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
@cult-logic:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com...

Copy-paste it if the url doesn't turn into a link.
Posted by cult-logic 7 years ago
cult-logic
Actually, moistcabbage, coral does have a of its life cycle during reproduction where they are not sedentary. When sponges sexually reproduce, they release sperm and eggs that combine to form larva zygotes that can move freely.
If they did not have this stage, they wouldn't be in the animal kingdom :)
Posted by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
Already did it the hard way. Cut and paste. Rofl copter
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
Oops, here's the link:

http://www.i400.photobucket.com...
Posted by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
@Moistcabbage:

i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp84/omfgonfire/slowpoke.jpg
Posted by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
The voting period is over but I would liketo correct my vote. Spelling should have been tied. Also, xStrikeX ( once again ) voted for himself. To future opponents of XstrikeX, I would suggest voting for yourself in an identical manner for the sake of negating his self vote without giving yourself an unfair advantage. As of the time of this comment, without his self vote. Theese two opponents would be tied.
Posted by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
Coral reef is alive. And does not move without outside influence ( current / fish etc. ). You did not provide a source stating that rubber, plastic or metal are not alive.
Posted by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
May I just point this out. hopefully this will clear things up.
Posted by frenchmoose 7 years ago
frenchmoose
it is unhealthy but it must be done
Posted by XStrikeX 7 years ago
XStrikeX
But if breathing is unhealthy, as you say, then don't do it!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 7 years ago
Rockylightning
frenchmooseKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:34 
Vote Placed by XStrikeX 7 years ago
XStrikeX
frenchmooseKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
frenchmooseKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Korashk 7 years ago
Korashk
frenchmooseKorashkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06