The Instigator
Bernard
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Chicken
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

workaholics can create a happy society

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Chicken
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/14/2012 Category: Society
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,456 times Debate No: 26203
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

Bernard

Con

To what extent do you agree that workaholics can create a happy society?
According to Fassell in 1990, he suggested that workaholics may contribute to the progressive numbing of America whereby individuals become separate from their essential self when they are consumed with the addictive busyness associated with work."
Chicken

Pro

500 Character Limit so

1) Workaholics promotes the legalization and recreational use of Marijuana, which in turn creates a happy effect upon Society. [1]

2) Marijuana relieves Stress [2]

3) Rowdy Behavior from Workaholics causes a change in Society, setting an example of what not to do (Drink and party all day) So people will create a better society by not following these examples [2]

[1] http://www.commonsensemedia.org...

[2] http://www.commondreams.org...


Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Smithereens 4 years ago
Smithereens
BernardChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: derivare culpam! derivare culpam!
Vote Placed by AlwaysMoreThanYou 4 years ago
AlwaysMoreThanYou
BernardChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had better arguments and sources. Counter votebomb Smithereens.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 4 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
BernardChickenTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: There's not much to say. Con didn't give himself any room to actually debate. Literally.