The Instigator
2001bhu
Pro (for)
Tied
10 Points
The Contender
MasterLucario
Con (against)
Tied
10 Points

would wars be worse is pokemon were real?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/24/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 509 times Debate No: 68869
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (4)

 

2001bhu

Pro

please accept then in round 2 i will lay out my case
MasterLucario

Con

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
2001bhu

Pro

ok it is late so this will be short
power of pokemon+modern day tech=death
MasterLucario

Con

I will lay out my case.
1.Who says Pokemon can't just remain neutral and not deal with this.
2.As long as legendary pokemon ex. Dialga and Palkia don't come in if pokemon don't remain neutral, there shouldn't be anything leading to death.
3.Pokemon could heal the wounded saving lives.
4.Pokemon ex. Chesnaught could be shields to protect soldiers meaning they won't physically fight.
5.Fast Pokemon ex.(talonflame, Greninja,and ninjask) could be great spies
Pokemon don't have to fight they can just support or be neutral.
Debate Round No. 2
2001bhu

Pro

i am sorry i have homework i don't have the time sorry
MasterLucario

Con

Same thing I said before. Also they can help lost soldiers and bring food and supplies to those who need it.
Debate Round No. 3
2001bhu

Pro

sorry i can still only answer
MasterLucario

Con

Since my opponent hasn't said anything, same as before. Also Pokemon could help evacuating soldiers escape and pack their supplies up.
Debate Round No. 4
2001bhu

Pro

sorry i don't have the time i formally forfeit the debate
MasterLucario

Con

OK so my opponent formally forfeited. Since I don't have anything to debate against, same thing I said before.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by 2001bhu 1 year ago
2001bhu
yes he is one of my friends from school I told him to make it a tie :)
He didn't do that not complaining though :) :) :) :) :)
Posted by MasterLucario 1 year ago
MasterLucario
Q.Buttercatx how can you vote that way?
1. He formally forfeited.
2. He didn't have time when he challenged me as he said even thiough he;s the one who wanted to debate with me in the first place.
possible answer: You are being biased.
Posted by 2001bhu 1 year ago
2001bhu
yes sorry didn't see that
Posted by MasterLucario 1 year ago
MasterLucario
Question, do you mean if? instead of is
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Kylar 1 year ago
Kylar
2001bhuMasterLucarioTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: arguments go to con, but I agree with pro and I think conduct was equal
Vote Placed by 21MolonLabe 1 year ago
21MolonLabe
2001bhuMasterLucarioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better grammar. Pro said that he FF the debate.
Vote Placed by ButterCatX 1 year ago
ButterCatX
2001bhuMasterLucarioTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: 2001bhu layed out a better argument.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 1 year ago
Zarroette
2001bhuMasterLucarioTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro formally forfeits in the final round.