xbox 360 is better than ps3
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
16kadams
| Started: | 3/22/2012 | Category: | Entertainment |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,480 times | Debate No: | 22242 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (4)
 Pro  Con C1: Online
Xbox on line costs 50$ per year, when you get the Xbox. [1] It is a well known fact people have to pay 50$ per year for Xbox live. Now why is this a problem? It makes the Xbox cost more in the long run, which is a major downside. C2: Cost Xbox 199-229$ in purchase cost. [2] PS3 299$ purchase cost. [3] ---> The point here is the purchase costs are similar, very similar. ---> As you have to pay for Xbox live it eventually costs more then the PS3 as your paying 50$ every month. ---> That means Xbox costs more C3: Blue Ray The Ps3 is the ONLY game console with blue ray built in with it. [4] Yes the only one. This is a major downside as now the Xbox cannot obtain the same good graphic quality, therefore a major downside to the Xbox. C4: PS3 = more reliable "A new study on game console reliability confirms the popular attitude that Microsoft's Xbox 360 is the least reliable of the current crop of set top systems. " [5] "42% of all [Xbox] owners have suffered hardware failure. Frankly, it’s unacceptable. Old topic I know but this reminds us what happens when competitors rush to complete we end up suffering. The survey also found that: PS3 failures came to 8% Wii failures came to 1%" [6] This is the worst part of the 360. ---> Xbox costs more, is unreliable, doesn't have as good graphics as the PS3 as it doesn't have blueray, and the PS3 is therefore better. VOTE CON [1] http://xbox.about.com... [2] http://www.walmart.com... [3] http://www.walmart.com... [4] http://us.playstation.com... [5] http://www.pcworld.com... [6] http://thegamingliberty.com... |
 |
|
Pro Con My opponents cost refutation is poor as that only covers 2 years. Then the costs begin to rise... Having more games isn't as much of an upside then having problems as xbox is unreliable. The argument here is on exclusive games, and the PS3 has exclusive games too. My opponent has no stats on this either. http://us.playstation.com... "37% are considering purchasing a PlayStation 3 over the next 12 months, with Xbox 360 close behind with 34%" http://www.1up.com... This shows gamers are pretty tied on the issue. The PS3 has a major lead with older gamers. http://www.vg247.com... My opponents memory claim is wrong. We too have the 320 gig system too. http://en.wikipedia.org... Also blue ray increases graphics and it allows blue ray discs. This mean Xbox is at a disadvantage. PS goes blue ray and normal disks, Xbox can't. My opponents arguments are wrong. Arguments he dropped: Reliability cost VOTE CON. |
 |
|
Pro Con X box actually has high negative ratings among people who own them. http://www.customerservicescoreboard.com... As your claim is not backed up with stats mine is more reliable. Arguments: He dropped my case sources: Obviously me... conduct: = S/G: I used words not solely text language resolution negated. |
 |
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by mee2kool4u369 1 year ago
| ras2000 | 16kadams | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: |  | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: this is very true
Vote Placed by Zaradi 1 year ago
| ras2000 | 16kadams | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: If you really need a RFD for this debate, you didn't read the debate. Easy n00bsnipe win for 16k
Vote Placed by kyro90 1 year ago
| ras2000 | 16kadams | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: This was a total fail of a debate in my perspective.
Vote Placed by blackblaze241 1 year ago
| ras2000 | 16kadams | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: 16kadams case was easy to read and understand.
he made more arguments and they were convincing.
i usually don't vote on grammar but since ras2000 used improper spelling I voted for 16k'.
16k was the only one who used sources.
:)
he challenged me