The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MrConservative
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

ye

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
MrConservative
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/5/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 242 times Debate No: 84562
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

nature will eventually chew its mechanical evolving oppostion being an anti force growing in a battle against the eternal beast of reality, like a butterfly under water unable to fly or breathe, or an ice cube thrown into a volcano, and with it, mechanical beings by dependence
MrConservative

Con

Nature is not capable of chewing, because it has no mouth, since it is not a biological form.

Nature: the phenomena of the physical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations.

Therefore Pro fails in making an argument.

Vote Con
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
you have a mechanical mouth perhaps
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
always do
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
Pro is debating a truism.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by tacoman 1 year ago
tacoman
vi_spexMrConservativeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: The pro is simply making invalid or nonsensical arguments, regardless of whether or not it is based on a true premise
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
vi_spexMrConservativeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better spelling.