The Instigator
orioleking1
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
MassiveDump
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

you are a nice person

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
MassiveDump
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/23/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 808 times Debate No: 35002
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (10)
Votes (6)

 

orioleking1

Pro

Nuff said.
MassiveDump

Con

My temper is shorter than the average citizen of Nepal.

I lie, cheat, steal, and occasionally kick puppies.

I made 16kadams sound like a Mexican in a thread simulator.

I'm a f*cking ginger.

Five minute argument rounds are horrible.

Nuff said, vote Con.
Debate Round No. 1
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
Where can I view the rules?
Posted by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
orioleking1 Don't feel stupid for learning, I also am learning how to use this site and sometimes it takes others members to show the way. I will remove my vote because I feel massive is telling the truth in that my vote is wrong.
Posted by orioleking1 3 years ago
orioleking1
I feel pretty stupid right now.
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
Then you would have voted for the wrong reason...?
Posted by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
Ok massive but what if I voted based on your attempt to be humorous?
Posted by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
No, rational's pretty right. You can only vote based on arguments provided, and Pro didn't make an argument... at all...
Posted by orioleking1 3 years ago
orioleking1
Rational thinker, you have just been blocked
Posted by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
Rational Thinker, I don't believe you remember requesting to never speak to each other again.

Also I feel my vote is justified in that Massive Dump IS a nice person based on his attempt to be humorous, it is actually your RFD that is invalid, something you would bomb and curse as you do, on other voters for, I see you making attempts to sway voters who vote against your opinions especially in your own debates, only I have also witnessed voters vote unjustly in your favour and you haven't seen you get all shirty with them, it's just proves to me how intellectually dishonest you really are......

I would appreciate if you actually kept to yourself to yourself and we stick to the agreement you requested and never speak to each other again. Unless by some act of God you actually mature and come to your senses.
Posted by orioleking1 3 years ago
orioleking1
Really, stop influencing a person's vote. It is their decision on who to vote for.
Posted by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
Oh johnlubba, still voting for the wrong guy I see. When will you stop this madness of reverse voting!
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 3 years ago
MrJosh
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: MassiveDump is a miserable excuse for a human being. Arguments to CON.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Con tried to be humorous so he at least has some good bones in him, whilst pro didn't defend the resolution, This debate proved to me that massive dump isn't as bad a person as he tries to make out, he at least tried to be funny, he even made a joke at his own expense about being ginger, and that has to count for something, conduct to Con
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 3 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: I hate 'em already
Vote Placed by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Rational_Thinker9119
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Obvious win is obvious.
Vote Placed by TUF 3 years ago
TUF
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is definitely a horrible person based on his arguments. Also he has no soul so how can he be nice? Also this mother fvcker kidnapped me and made me pay him a million dollars. Pro loses fo sho
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
orioleking1MassiveDumpTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro, next time at least label your question to clarify which side gives you victory. The lack of clarity alone makes your side of the debate too weak, that even this fail debate con gets arguments (as he answered the question... As much as morally I'm opposed to puppy kicking, and will have to cite this debate sometime as proof against gingers).