you are more evil than i am crazy REMATCH

I would like to state that this is a rematch on the unfortunate outcome of our previous debate....LET IT BEGIN (AGAIN)

Ok, since my opponent has decided to forfeit the first round to submit a challenge, I'll begin.

Some history on the topic: crazypenguin, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

This entire argument all began in about September, when me and my opponent decided to create a survey for the following question: Is my opponent more crazy than I am evil, or am I more evil that he is crazy?

And so began an epic battle between us.

To begin:

My opponent has submitted the challenge for this debate, and therefore he must have some inkling of what he is going to say. He has to prove the claim.

1. I say that neither of us are evil or crazy, so I can't be more evil than you are crazy, since neither of us are evil or crazy.

2. Even if we were, I am not nearly as evil as you are crazy.

a. Our usernames: CRAZYpenguin. Burningpuppies. Your username is clearly the product of a crazy insane mind. Penguins are not crazy. You must be crazy to think penguins are crazy. My username is the product of a ethics lesson, one I want to hold dear to heart. The lesson was this: even if its right, most people won't do it, since people don't like burning puppies. For a more in depth explaination, I suggest you refer to our first debate.

So for final words: Prove it.

so my worthy opponent strikes back but...............

his argument of that neither of us is evil or crazy is FALSE, yes i tell you he is completely 100% evil so ha there goes his argument.

Second he is PURE evil, listen my fellow listeners he is EVIL and I have proof (proven below)

My username has a perfect reason to I thought of Crazypenguin by looking at a picture and using it as a email thing and then instead of thinking of something else I used if for debate. SO HA (again).

Don't worry I will prove it

This burninppuppies is a close friend of mine and he often tazers me which hurts refer to first debate.

IT HURTS=EVIL

HAHA
good luck,
hows the other side of the world?
I look forward to your arguments

Thanks to my opponent for the quick and wonderufl response.

Wrong. My argument is:
1. You are more crazy than I am evil.
2. We are both not crazy nor evil, so this argument is moot.

So as to why he is more crazy than I am evil. I am going to quote some of his own words, which clearly show his insanity.

"his argument of that neither of us is evil or crazy is FALSE, yes i tell you he is completely 100% evil so ha there goes his argument."

In that sentence, not only does he not use correct punctuation, but his grammar is quite incorrect. It is only by luck that I am able to understand my opponent, and his incoherence clearly shows his insanity. Also, he has taken to laughing randomly during his speech, using "ha", and that also shows his insanity because he is laughing at random points in time.

"My username has a perfect reason to I thought of Crazypenguin by looking at a picture and using it as a email thing and then instead of thinking of something else I used if for debate. SO HA (again)."

My opponent clearly shows his insanity in this quote. 1. Grammar is quite messed up. 2. He is too lazy to think, a clear sign of insanity. 3. He again decides to randomly shout "HA!" at me, even when he has lost the point.

As to why I am not evil.
evil, as defined by Merriam Webster, is to be morally reprehensible, arising from actual bad character or conduct.

I have never commited a crime, and have tried to lead my life by the highest moral standards. Therefore I am not evil by conduct or character.

Now my opponent tries to prove I am evil by saying that I "tazer him". He claims that it hurts, and therefore I am evil.

Problems with that argument:

a. My opponent has offered no proof as to those actions, nor can he prove I have done those things. Since we both live in the US, we both are subject to innocent until proven guilty. He can't prove my guilt, so I'm innocent.

b. Even if I did, he said it himself, I am a close friend of his. I am proud to be his friend, and if I ever did anything that might have hurt him mentally, physically, or emotionally, I am sorry.

c. Allow me to redefine what my opponent calls "tazers". It is not the gun, which shoots out a dart on a cable and then shocks you into submission. Tazers, are basically when one comes up behind the victim and quickly and painlessly tickles him in the side, right under the ribcage. If you have ever seen this, experienced this, or ever done it, you will know that it often creates a response in the victim, along the lines of a squeal and a jump. It is quick painless, and is only meant in good humor. If I have ever hurt my opponent through "tazers" I am terribly sorry. It also doesn't hurt.

Thank you.

PS I got back last night.

Thanks for you argument but I have one thing to say

YOU ARE PURE EVIL FOR MAKING ME READ THAT ESSAY!!! JEEZ DID YOU LOOK AT THE WORD COUNT....

okay that out of the way,

"grammar messed up, lazy to think, insanity, losing"

all of these are insults that show his pure evilness.

thanks,
oh how was it?

Thanks to my opponent for this wonderful debate.

1. My opponent claims I am evil by making him read my previous argument. But seeing as we are on debate.org, one is expected to be detailed. That isn't evil, that is only using what is given.

Ok, that out of the way.

2. All my "insults" were analysis of this behaviour.

I am not pure evil, as my opponent claims. He has not proved that I am more evil than he is crazy. He makes no arguments that hold water, only claiming that I am evil. I have sufficiently proved that not only is he crazy, but I am not evil.

Therefore, I urge you to vote NEG.

And it was great.