The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Devnith
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

you dont have any beliefs, its simply not true

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
vi_spex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 12 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 385 times Debate No: 92019
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (14)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

you can pretend you have beliefs
Devnith

Con

According to my opponent, pretending to have a belief is the best way to have a belif is to pretend to have one, which still makes you in both ways not have a belif.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

thefore i am right
Devnith

Con

What flaw my opponent is missing is either way, is you still lack a belief. Therefor his argument contradicts the debate all together. Not believing in something is not true, you don't have belif if your belif in yourself. It'd simply impossible.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

belief is belief..

i dont have belief systems, i know my experience of now
Devnith

Con

My opponent still contradicts the argument. His extreme lack of knowledge has driven him to write a 10 worded argument which lacks detail to an epence level. My opponent still cannot address the debate topic and completely lacks information. He has now rebutted my arguments and therefor my arguments are correct.
Debate Round No. 3
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
you dont disagree
Posted by fixedwounds 12 months ago
fixedwounds
pro provided 0 clear information and I don't think they ever will.
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
christ=see returning rise form
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
only know is true.. know is now, cant go back in time
Posted by Just-Call-Me-PK 12 months ago
Just-Call-Me-PK
still doesn't conclude it can't be true.
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
machines cant tell me what is real, only what to believe
Posted by Just-Call-Me-PK 12 months ago
Just-Call-Me-PK
To know the past beyond my own requires recorded truths.
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
only slight pretend involved
Posted by vi_spex 12 months ago
vi_spex
i know you remember the past
Posted by Just-Call-Me-PK 12 months ago
Just-Call-Me-PK
If you believe all truth is in the past and if it is possible for even one piece of revelation to be true, you could be rejecting truth today.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 42lifeuniverseverything 12 months ago
42lifeuniverseverything
vi_spexDevnithTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: A logical mess. A complete logical mess. Because of extremely poor spelling and grammar, I could not make heads or tails of Con's argument on the contradiction. I give Pro conduct because Con accusing Pro of low intelligence is unacceptable. I give arguments to Pro because here is how I interpret Con's argument in round 1. If you pretend to have a belief you have none. If you considered pretending to believe the best way you still have none. But see Con, Pro said in round 1 that you can pretend to have beliefs. Forget the title, that is what he said. So if that is what he asserted and you never head on addressed whether beliefs are real (you asserted that a contradiction was occurring when there really wasn't one logically), then I see no choice but to conclude based on the arguments that beliefs are not real. Therefore Pro wins because the resolution is upheld.