The Instigator
duckgirl
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
cheeto125
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

you should not have to grauate to go to college

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
cheeto125
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/6/2014 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 465 times Debate No: 48511
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

duckgirl

Con

everyone should have to graduate to be able to get in to any college
cheeto125

Pro

Wait, I'm sorry. I thought you were against having to graduate. Didn't read it correctly. My bad.
Debate Round No. 1
duckgirl

Con

I am con not pro that is you.
cheeto125

Pro

Oh. Well you should have to graduate to get into a college. I'm pretty sure no college will accept you. Well the big colleges won't. If you want to be successful in life, I recommend graduating from school.
Debate Round No. 2
duckgirl

Con

duckgirl forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
duckgirl

Con

well it all depends were you plan to go to college like me I am in culinary school you shouldn't have to have a diploma to do things like cooking designing clothing .
cheeto125

Pro

Well... Honestly, I do not think they get paid a lot. But, if you want to be a successful cooker, designer, or clothes maker, I think you should have diploma. And half of the colleges will not accept you because you do not have a diploma. In my case I wouldn't want an idiot cooking my food, designing my clothes, or anything. You should finish high school.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
duckgirlcheeto125Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for missed round, even if pro inched it back away from himself by insulting a large margin of the workforce. S&G could be a little better on both sides, it does favor pro, but not by a significant enough margin for the point. Arguments never became strong, pro's argument that cooks and clothing designers will not be paid a lot, seemed to not connect to the reality of the workplace which tends to only look back at the last degree; con bringing those up reminds me that people do go to at least community college with neither a high school diploma or a GED.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
duckgirlcheeto125Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con lost conduct for the forfeit.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
duckgirlcheeto125Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro stuffed up the debate at the start, by accidentally thinking he/she was on the other side. This was evened out, in terms of conduct, when Con forfeited a round. Basically, Con argued that you shouldn't need a diploma in order to cook and design clothes, but never backed this up with anything. Pro countered by arguing that a diploma, in way, proves that you're not an idiot (as you wouldn't want an idiot doing those things). So, Pro's argument was more developed than Con's.