your mom goes to college
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
TheRecordMaker
| Started: | 5/30/2012 | Category: | News |
| Updated: | 11 months ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 462 times | Debate No: | 23944 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)
|
your mom goes to college - enough said
your mom goes to college "The best insult ever. You will totally PWN anyone with this retort." Deb "I'm trying to raise money for college" Kip: "Your mom goes to college!" SHE GOT SO SERVED http://www.urbandictionary.com...
Pro has BOP and needs to prove that my Mom goes to college. Remember, "goes" is present tense. |
![]() |
|
I am correct in the argument because, as the definition was defined, I PWN anyone by stating that "your mom goes to college".
Also, it shouldn't be so difficult as to state whether or not his mom does go to college, it's a de minimus effort... so insisting the burden of proof comes to me is cheap. he could at least deny it and then insist that I proof my assertions more concretely.
You are incorrect in the argument because you have not beat me. You still have not affirmed the resolution. You are the instigator and the affirming arty, therefore, you must accept the BOP. Prove that my mom currently goes to college. If you can not, then you lose on the basis of an unfulfilled BOP. I offically deny that my mom goes to college and ask that you provide physical evidence that my mom goes to college. I hand it over to my opponent and hope that my opponent fulfills the necessary proof needed to affirm the resolution. |
![]() |
|
As the definition states, by asserting as I did that your mom goes to college, I PWN your arguments automatically.
Pro should also win because I have to tell Con what to debate, and something so fundamental too... eg, to officially deny that your mother goes to college. Also, given the assertion is defined as an insult from the beginning... you are merely being insulted, and have yet to properly talk smack back. again, something too fundamental, and again me telling you how to debate most optimal.
You have not pwned me since you have not proved that my mom goes to college. Until that is the case, I have pwned you. Ok. I offically deny that my mom goes to college. Enough said. And you don't have to tell me what to debate because I already know the resolution "your mom goes to college", which you have not proved. You haven't insulted me since you have not proved that my mom goes to college. I'll throw an insult at you and won't retract it until you prove the resolution. Here it is: Tom: You know what's so funny about this debate? Jim: What? Tom: That pro in this debate expects to win when she has not proven the resolution! Jim: I'm certainly not voting for pro until that happens! Tom: Vote con! Jim: Yes, vote con! My message to all, "Vote con!". |
![]() |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by kyro90 11 months ago

Report this Comment
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Contra 11 months ago
| dairygirl4u2c | TheRecordMaker | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not meet BoP
Vote Placed by mee2kool4u369 11 months ago
| dairygirl4u2c | TheRecordMaker | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: -
Vote Placed by Ron-Paul 11 months ago
| dairygirl4u2c | TheRecordMaker | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: No proof by pro, even though she had BOP.
Vote Placed by Mrparkers 11 months ago
| dairygirl4u2c | TheRecordMaker | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: This debate perfectly explains why Pro's win ratio is 8
Vote Placed by TheOrator 11 months ago
| dairygirl4u2c | TheRecordMaker | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: You know, I really thought Con's mother went to college, but Pro just couldn't prove it








