Debate.org members
Estate Tax Debates
Estate Tax Debates
History and Debate of Estate Tax
The inheritance tax, or estate tax, is a tax which the United States levies on the total taxable value of the estate of a deceased person. The amount of tax is calculated regardless of the method in which the assets of the estate are transferred to the person's heirs: assets included in a will, transferred automatically because the person died intestate or as an insurance benefit or account payoff. Inheritance tax is paid by the executor of the estate or by the person in charge of its assets.
The United States has a consolidated policy on inheritance and gift tax so that a person cannot give away his or her estate to potential beneficiaries shortly before death in order to avoid taxation; beneficiaries would simply pay gift tax rather than inheritance tax in this case. The federal government makes a distinction between the "gross estate" (all assets) and the "taxable estate" (assets less a certain number of allowable deductions such as funeral expenses, some charitable contributions and various other deductions).
In most cases, if the estate is left to a charitable organization or a surviving spouse, no inheritance tax is due. There are also exclusions for a certain portion of the estate; however, these have been frequently changed by recent tax legislation, and usually, it is worth consulting a professional to determine what amount of the estate is not taxable under current federal law. In part because these complexities make it possible for some wealthy people to establish shelters that let them avoid estate tax; the estate tax debate has been going on for years.
Opponents of Estate Tax
Opponents of inheritance tax typically refer to it pejoratively as "death tax." They argue first that concern over burdening their children with this tax may lead elderly to make unwise investment decisions late in life, and that it may also discourage entrepreneurship earlier in life. Opponents also claim that morally it should be only the choice of the person who earned the money what should be done with it, not the government. They see taxing wealth at death as a kind of forced income redistribution that goes against free-market capitalism. Also, studies suggest that the expense to the government of collecting the estate tax is almost as high as the funds received from it, thus making it a highly inefficient way to get revenue.
Proponents of Estate Tax
Proponents of the inheritance tax say that it helps prevent consolidation of wealth in the hands of a few powerful families and is a basic building block of the nation's system of progressive taxation. They also feel that inheriting large sums without tax undermines people's motives to work hard in the future and, thus, undercuts the principles of capitalism, encouraging people to become idle and unproductive, which hurts the country overall. Those in favor of the inheritance tax also point out that, contrary to claims, it taxes the same earnings twice; within the structure of US estate tax, much inherited money is in the form not of prior salary for work, but of unrealized capital gains, money on which no tax has ever been paid before. Finally, proponents also make the point that transfers of wealth from generation to generation have often been limited, and the amounts that are currently being transferred are so high as to have very little historical precedent, thus making taxing them less onerous. The controversy that has raged over inheritance tax in the United States shows little sign of abating.
For Estate Tax
Pro
Comment: Estate taxation is a joke. The accumulation of trillions in wealth by the mega trusts, foundations and estates (e.g., Gates, Ford, Paul Getty, Robert Wood Johnson, W.K. Kellogg, Hewlett, Packard, Mellon, Lilly, Helmsely, William Penn, Rockerfeller Foundation, Conrad N. Hilton, Walton Family, etc.) happened because the workers were underpaid and did not share in the profits, and too little was paid in state and Federal taxes to begin with; and these businesses were not taxed at high enough rates. The owners of the businesses made egregious profits and paid the workers very low wages and did not share in the exorbitant profits. Many of these huge estates exist because of huge grants from the Federal and State governments which were paid for by the taxes of the ordinary people. Some of the trusts and estates can be traced back to families that received millions of acres of land granted to then by English Kings that were not redistributed after the America Revolution â€" those million
Comment: Based on the principles outlined in Thomas Paine's "Agrarian Justice".
Comment: Currently it is only applied to people making over 4 million. Seriously? People making 1 million can't afford to part with a small, just tiny portion of that inheritance?
Comment: Rich people should pay more in order to help the poor and promote welfare of the nation.
Comment: There's no reason the Sultan of Brunei should give each kid a billion bucks upon death rather than the state taking half and distributing it to people who actually need the money.
Comment: I do not agree with an estate tax in it's current format. The last thing someone needs to be doing after the loss of a family member is thinking about taxes. However, I grasp the concept and strongly believe in government regulation on mega legacies. I feel that an Estate (and gift) cap would be more appropriate. Everything below is not taxed, everything over is ceased by the government.
Comment: Make it as high as possible. People shouldn't be able to give ten million dollars of their will money to their dog *cough* Leona Helmsley *cough*
Comment: An excellent method of promoting equality and, even more importantly, meritocracy.
Comment: I cannot justify that people start life with 'a head start' by simply having the fortune of emerging from a particular woman. To counter-act the egregious income disparity currently showcased in our world, there should be a limit to the amount people will inherit. This will not affect capitalism itself, in fact spending should increase (because people are spending the excess money towards old-age).
Comment: People should not be allowed to accumulate wealth over generations without earning it, moreover, the estate tax is a valuable source of government revenue. It only comes into play for the extremely wealthy anyway, and when rich people complain about paying money, especially when it's AFTER they're already fucking dead, I just laugh.
Against Estate Tax
Con
Comment: See flat tax
Comment: More tax is bad.
Comment: Theft from the dead.
Comment: The estate tax is an unfair limitation on the ability to transfer property.
Comment: Government gets money if a family member dies, hell no
Comment: The money has already been taxed. So what if someone receives a $10,000,000 inheritence, or 10 times that? The money does not belong to any of us, or the government. And given the history of large inheritences, the money will be going into the economy when the recipient blows it all. The Estate tax is just the greedy government trying to get its hands on more money that it's already taxed.
Comment: Mansions, yes. Terraces, no.
Comment: Leads to waste in money before the person dies. Inefficient way to get taxes.
Comment: If the money is not an 'income' enough to tax it while I have it alive and well, you shouldn't be stealing it from my kids just because I die.
Comment: Remove welfare and there's no need to tax so much

