Total Posts:51|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

People to be added

Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 9:51:37 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
Intellectuals.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
brian_eggleston
Posts: 3,347
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 9:58:20 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
-Women in general
-Men over the age of 35
-Nazis
-Black
-Latino
-Asian
-Old people
-foreigners

Not sure we need any more nazis but agreed otherwise.
Visit the burglars' bulletin board: http://www.break-in-news.com...
el-badgero
Posts: 1,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 10:01:57 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
we need more amish.
DATCMOTO's moustache makes him look like an eejit...

edit: nah, i'm jealous... God's an eejit definitely though!
el-badgero
Posts: 1,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 10:06:33 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
and tribes people.
DATCMOTO's moustache makes him look like an eejit...

edit: nah, i'm jealous... God's an eejit definitely though!
el-badgero
Posts: 1,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 10:09:02 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
we might already have a few reptilians. would we really want to be welcoming them though?
DATCMOTO's moustache makes him look like an eejit...

edit: nah, i'm jealous... God's an eejit definitely though!
Kinesis
Posts: 3,667
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 10:27:01 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 10:09:02 AM, el-badgero wrote:
we might already have a few reptilians. would we really want to be welcoming them though?

*shapeshifts back to human form*

Yeah, totally.
el-badgero
Posts: 1,045
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 10:34:41 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 10:27:01 AM, Kinesis wrote:
At 6/26/2011 10:09:02 AM, el-badgero wrote:
we might already have a few reptilians. would we really want to be welcoming them though?

*shapeshifts back to human form*

Yeah, totally.

bear grylls is hardly a reptilian?
DATCMOTO's moustache makes him look like an eejit...

edit: nah, i'm jealous... God's an eejit definitely though!
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 12:59:24 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
We seem to be most lacking in people over the age of 40 and females. We also need more non Americans.
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 6:43:54 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
We also desperately need a few more cliff.stamps
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:39:00 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 6:43:54 PM, phantom wrote:
We also desperately need a few more cliff.stamps

A few more cliff.stamps would get rid of the izbo10s.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Brainmaster
Posts: 1,603
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:45:39 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].

It's not pseudoscience if they are right.
Kfc.
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:48:57 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 8:45:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].

It's not pseudoscience if they are right.

Well, http://en.wikipedia.org... for an explanation of scientific racism and particularly a sentence that pretty much sums the reason why it's a pseudoscience: "fter the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO's antiracist statement "The Race Question" (1950): "The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race' should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes ‘race' is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of 'race' has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering." However, the statement acknowledged that different human races exist.[2] Beginning in the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete, and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories and a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[3]" (from the Wikipedia article)
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Brainmaster
Posts: 1,603
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:49:39 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 8:48:57 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:45:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].

It's not pseudoscience if they are right.

Well, http://en.wikipedia.org... for an explanation of scientific racism and particularly a sentence that pretty much sums the reason why it's a pseudoscience: "fter the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO's antiracist statement "The Race Question" (1950): "The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race' should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes ‘race' is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of 'race' has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering." However, the statement acknowledged that different human races exist.[2] Beginning in the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete, and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories and a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[3]" (from the Wikipedia article)

You are wrong
Kfc.
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 8:51:42 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 8:49:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:48:57 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:45:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].

It's not pseudoscience if they are right.

Well, http://en.wikipedia.org... for an explanation of scientific racism and particularly a sentence that pretty much sums the reason why it's a pseudoscience: "fter the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO's antiracist statement "The Race Question" (1950): "The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race' should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes ‘race' is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of 'race' has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering." However, the statement acknowledged that different human races exist.[2] Beginning in the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete, and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories and a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[3]" (from the Wikipedia article)

You are wrong

Please explain.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Brainmaster
Posts: 1,603
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/26/2011 9:05:59 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 8:51:42 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:49:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:48:57 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:45:39 PM, Brainmaster wrote:
At 6/26/2011 8:38:17 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 6/26/2011 1:51:54 AM, Rockylightning wrote:
-Women over the age of 25
I agree.
-Women in general
I agree.
-Men over the age of 35
Well, there are a few people on this website over the age of thirty, like Cliff, for example. But, yes, I agree.
-Nazis
No. After seeing what they did with their gas chambers and concentration camps, coupled with the silly pseudoscience they promoted [scientific racism], I would say having Nazis on this website would be a disaster.

But, you're probably joking.
-Black
Yes.
-Latino
Yes.
-Asian
Yes.
-Old people
Honestly, I disagree. Two members on this website, both well over the age of sixty, have been posting on a debate called "Newly-revealed scientific laws...". They demonstrate an absolute arrogance and stubborness towards new ideas and refuse to stop commenting and arguing with other members. I've tried my best to stop them, but the two keep coming back with their strawman arguments and emotional pleas [which I find bitter]. Here's a link about the debate, http://www.debate.org...]
-foreigners
No, but only to a degree: if he/she understands English and/or the conventions of a debate. Not to be mean, I would like to point out that one member [http://www.debate.org...] has showed that by not only writing poor English, misunderstanding, and wasting, debates with inappropriate arguments [such as arguing in a debate about toplessness with a copied section on the history of bras (http://www.debate.org...].

It's not pseudoscience if they are right.

Well, http://en.wikipedia.org... for an explanation of scientific racism and particularly a sentence that pretty much sums the reason why it's a pseudoscience: "fter the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO's antiracist statement "The Race Question" (1950): "The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race' should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes ‘race' is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of 'race' has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering." However, the statement acknowledged that different human races exist.[2] Beginning in the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete, and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories and a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[3]" (from the Wikipedia article)

You are wrong

Please explain.

you r wrong
Kfc.
Rockylightning
Posts: 2,862
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 1:45:27 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/26/2011 9:03:40 PM, Waater wrote:
At 6/26/2011 9:51:37 AM, Man-is-good wrote:
Intellectuals.

Burrrrn, everybody! He burned all of you.

Quiet Mr. I've got a plan that will win mafia but doesnt work.
Rockylightning
Posts: 2,862
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2011 2:04:13 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 6/27/2011 1:54:44 AM, FREEDO wrote:
We don't have many Phillipino technocratic midgets. They are always interesting.

Speaking of them, we also need moar trolls.

We have a troll shortage.