Total Posts:92|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Will I get banned if...

Joseph_Mengele
Posts: 388
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:04:00 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I can't see why you wouldn't be allowed.
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
Posts: 18,324
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:05:19 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

It is, though I must admit you haven't been faring well in the public's view with your white-supremacist views.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
kohai
Posts: 380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:06:00 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
I hope.

Will not upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is :unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, harmful, hateful, harassing, pornographic, threatening, racially or ethnically offensive, abusive, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate.

To some it may seem racially offensive so there is a banning ground.
1) Whatever has contradictory attributes does not exist.
2) The Biblical God has contradictory attributes.
3) Therefore, the Biblical God does not exist
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:06:27 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:04:00 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I can't see why you wouldn't be allowed.

I can. You probably won't get banned, but I wish you would. The funny part about this is, you're basically insulting many people and not actually expressing a valid belief, but in the name of freedom of speech, there are those here on DDO that will see to it that you get to vomit whatever corrosive garbage you see fit.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:08:15 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:06:00 PM, kohai wrote:
I hope.

Will not upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is :unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, harmful, hateful, harassing, pornographic, threatening, racially or ethnically offensive, abusive, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate.

To some it may seem racially offensive so there is a banning ground.

Not directly, though the swaztika implies genocide and the Nazi regime (Holocaust, anyone)...But that is not something that is sufficient enough to directly be "unlawful, obscene...racially or ethnically offensive, abusive..." and so on...
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:10:15 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:06:27 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:00 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I can't see why you wouldn't be allowed.

I can. You probably won't get banned, but I wish you would. The funny part about this is, you're basically insulting many people and not actually expressing a valid belief, but in the name of freedom of speech, there are those here on DDO that will see to it that you get to vomit whatever corrosive garbage you see fit.

Fitting that your picture is of Lincoln, a symbol of totalitarianism in the States. Actually maybe John Adams or Woodrow Wilson would be more fitting? I know we've gone through this before but I can't resist. Sorry. ;)
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:10:53 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.

case in point. You are free to vomit what ever corrosive trash you wish, and people like this will defend your right to do so.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:10:59 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.

Apparently it should incite an outrage because libertarians don't respect property rights?
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...
DetectableNinja
Posts: 6,043
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:13:24 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
It may be walking the line, mate--I wouldn't recommend it. People can be very sensitive, after all.
Think'st thou heaven is such a glorious thing?
I tell thee, 'tis not half so fair as thou
Or any man that breathes on earth.

- Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:14:27 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:13:24 PM, DetectableNinja wrote:
It may be walking the line, mate--I wouldn't recommend it. People can be very sensitive, after all.

True...The reactions to Mengele's posts (including mine) have been rather strongly-worded. Case in point: Cerebral_Narcissist calls him (or rather inquire if he is) autistic....
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:17:19 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:10:59 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.

Apparently it should incite an outrage because libertarians don't respect property rights?

Actually that's true. Juggle is a private organization but I technically wouldn't be violating property rights in defending him. They're free to ban Mengele whenever they want or anyone who defends him.
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
Joseph_Mengele
Posts: 388
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:17:26 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:10:15 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:06:27 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:00 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I can't see why you wouldn't be allowed.

I can. You probably won't get banned, but I wish you would. The funny part about this is, you're basically insulting many people and not actually expressing a valid belief, but in the name of freedom of speech, there are those here on DDO that will see to it that you get to vomit whatever corrosive garbage you see fit.

Fitting that your picture is of Lincoln, a symbol of totalitarianism in the States. Actually maybe John Adams or Woodrow Wilson would be more fitting? I know we've gone through this before but I can't resist. Sorry. ;)

Why would it be Woodrow Wilson. Didn't he create the Federal Reserve? What an idiot for a President I would say.

I think that the best President was Jefferson Davis., or maybe George Washington.
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:24:54 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:17:19 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:10:59 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.

Apparently it should incite an outrage because libertarians don't respect property rights?

Actually that's true. Juggle is a private organization but I technically wouldn't be violating property rights in defending him. They're free to ban Mengele whenever they want or anyone who defends him.

It wouldn't be violating property rights, however it wouldn't be respecting them. The fact that your attacking about the decision of how to use their property isn't exactly respecting tr property rights. It would be like If I had a few friends over, one of them came wearing the swatsika sign, and I told that person to get the f*ck out of my house and then people arguing that I made the wrong decision, when nobody has an intrinsic right to be at my house in the first place.
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...
Tim_Spin
Posts: 446
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:34:41 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:24:54 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:17:19 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:10:59 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:08:16 PM, Tim_Spin wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
Hate Content
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

A liberal interpretation of hate content could get you banned I guess. If you do get banned for it, I hope it incites an outrage as there are more than a few free speech libertarians on this site. I've got your back if mods give you sht. Though really I don't know what I would do.

Apparently it should incite an outrage because libertarians don't respect property rights?

Actually that's true. Juggle is a private organization but I technically wouldn't be violating property rights in defending him. They're free to ban Mengele whenever they want or anyone who defends him.

It wouldn't be violating property rights, however it wouldn't be respecting them. The fact that your attacking about the decision of how to use their property isn't exactly respecting tr property rights. It would be like If I had a few friends over, one of them came wearing the swatsika sign, and I told that person to get the f*ck out of my house and then people arguing that I made the wrong decision, when nobody has an intrinsic right to be at my house in the first place.

I can still argue that your decision was stupid and pointless, but I'm not going to forcefully stop you from removing that person as it is well within your right. Another example would be if McDonalds started discriminated against blacks and not serving them or giving them jobs on account of their race This is well within their property rights but I'm still going to boycott them and urge others to do the same because I realize I have no right to actually make them stop.
Astonished, the talent agent asks the man what him and his family call their act.The man responds, "The Aristocrats!"
RoyLatham
Posts: 4,488
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/2/2011 9:41:23 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:17:26 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:

Why would it be Woodrow Wilson. Didn't he create the Federal Reserve? What an idiot for a President I would say.

Woodrow Wilson was an ardent segregationist from South Carolina. He segregated the U.S. civil service, which had been integrated up to that time.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 4:43:53 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
Look at me everyone! Look at me! I am a white nationalist! Oooh! That's so different and cool, how do you like them apples! Does it is thrill you that I say things so at odds with society! Yea take them society! I am going to do Hitler salutes in my bedroom! I am so cool.

Oh shut up!
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 4:47:26 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:14:27 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:13:24 PM, DetectableNinja wrote:
It may be walking the line, mate--I wouldn't recommend it. People can be very sensitive, after all.

True...The reactions to Mengele's posts (including mine) have been rather strongly-worded. Case in point: Cerebral_Narcissist calls him (or rather inquire if he is) autistic....

I don't say that because I am offended, I have no issue with his views, I have no issue with hios screen name, I have no issue with him wanting to use a swastika. I have issue with his utter triviality.

We could be having a discussion about bread and he would chime in with,
"Oh I can only eat white bread, because I only like white things, oh and the baker guy has to be white. I don't like bread made by blacks.".

He is an utter moron!
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 4:50:52 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
It wouldn't be violating property rights, however it wouldn't be respecting them. The fact that your attacking about the decision of how to use their property isn't exactly respecting tr property rights. It would be like If I had a few friends over, one of them came wearing the swatsika sign, and I told that person to get the f*ck out of my house and then people arguing that I made the wrong decision, when nobody has an intrinsic right to be at my house in the first place.
I can believe you have the right to make the decision without believing you made the right decision. I can even boycott you for how you use your property if I feel that strongly about it.

Now, I wouldn't feel that strongly here, despite being against their banning "hate content"-- it's understandable due to legal issues.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
devinni01841
Posts: 1,405
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 7:41:00 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:04:46 PM, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?

Because if it isn't allowed, then I clearly won't do it, I just want to know if I'm allowed to do it, and I won't obviously like to have found it out after I was banned.

I'm not sure but I don't see a reason why it won't be allowed. You can get banned for:

Advertising or Spam
Fraud or Phishing
Harassment or Privacy Invasion
Harm to Minors
*******************Hate Content********************
Impersonation or Misrepresentation
Insulting Other Member(s)
Nudity or Pornography
Violence or Threats
Other (please specify)

enough said
There is nothing more bad-@ss than being yourself.

I solemnly swear I am up to no good.

Member of the Texas Army National Guard since 20111212

An Armed society is a polite society.
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 7:47:54 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/3/2011 4:47:26 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:14:27 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:13:24 PM, DetectableNinja wrote:
It may be walking the line, mate--I wouldn't recommend it. People can be very sensitive, after all.

True...The reactions to Mengele's posts (including mine) have been rather strongly-worded. Case in point: Cerebral_Narcissist calls him (or rather inquire if he is) autistic....

I don't say that because I am offended, I have no issue with his views, I have no issue with hios screen name, I have no issue with him wanting to use a swastika. I have issue with his utter triviality.

We could be having a discussion about bread and he would chime in with,
"Oh I can only eat white bread, because I only like white things, oh and the baker guy has to be white. I don't like bread made by blacks.".

He is an utter moron.

Well, that's just one reason why he's disliked....It's the same with all the threads about conspiracy theories, dating, gamers, and so on that he chimed in with his racist views. And then we have another diversion of the thread, and the thread goes off course because of the member's response to his comments.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:24:29 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?:

I don't like nazi ideology at all, but I would defend your freedom of expression. To my knowledge that doesn't not violate the ToS.
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:31:36 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
You probably won't get banned, but I wish you would. The funny part about this is, you're basically insulting many people and not actually expressing a valid belief, but in the name of freedom of speech, there are those here on DDO that will see to it that you get to vomit whatever corrosive garbage you see fit.:

It's amusing that you would model your beliefs more along the line of a totalitarian government that suppresses dissent (like the Nazi's) while simultaneously denouncing.... the Nazi's....

You either believe and defend the freedom of speech and expression or you're against it. You don't merely defend the right of people to say things you personally agree with... defend all of it or risk losing it altogether.
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:32:36 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/3/2011 10:24:29 AM, PARADIGM_L0ST wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?:

I don't like nazi ideology at all, but I would defend your freedom of expression. To my knowledge that doesn't not violate the ToS.

HATE CONTENT. how else would you define hate content other than a deliberate swastika? I'd certainly defend his right to banishment if anything.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
PARADIGM_L0ST
Posts: 6,958
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:38:43 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
HATE CONTENT. how else would you define hate content other than a deliberate swastika? I'd certainly defend his right to banishment if anything.:

"Hate content" is ambiguous as "Hate crimes." Who gets decide what constitutes "hate content.?" Both are bullsh*t censorship under the guise of political correctness. Period. And if Juggle banned him for posting a symbol that's existed long before white nationalism existed, I would boycott Juggle.

He's an idiot, I don't agree with any of his views, but what is it harming you or anyone if he puts up a swastika?

Are you too weak to live with freedom?
"Have you ever considered suicide? If not, please do." -- Mouthwash (to Inferno)
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:47:07 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/3/2011 10:38:43 AM, PARADIGM_L0ST wrote:
HATE CONTENT. how else would you define hate content other than a deliberate swastika? I'd certainly defend his right to banishment if anything.:

"Hate content" is ambiguous as "Hate crimes." Who gets decide what constitutes "hate content.?" Both are bullsh*t censorship under the guise of political correctness. Period. And if Juggle banned him for posting a symbol that's existed long before white nationalism existed, I would boycott Juggle.

He's an idiot, I don't agree with any of his views, but what is it harming you or anyone if he puts up a swastika?

Are you too weak to live with freedom?

Lol give your freedom speech elsewhere. The question at hand is the website's rules, not whether or not you feel like you have a right to say anything you want. Since the website is against Hate content I'm a little confused as to the purpose of this asinine freedom speech. (not that I don't believe everyone has a right to say whatever they want, just that the way most of you handle the Mengele situation does not sit right with me).
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Joseph_Mengele
Posts: 388
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/3/2011 10:55:34 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 9/3/2011 10:32:36 AM, 000ike wrote:
At 9/3/2011 10:24:29 AM, PARADIGM_L0ST wrote:
At 9/2/2011 9:00:46 PM, Joseph_Mengele wrote:
I'm considering of switching out the picture of George Lincoln Rockwell, for a swastika. Is this not allowed or...?:

I don't like nazi ideology at all, but I would defend your freedom of expression. To my knowledge that doesn't not violate the ToS.

HATE CONTENT. how else would you define hate content other than a deliberate swastika? I'd certainly defend his right to banishment if anything.

We aren't playing Dungeons and Dragons, you can't banish anyone.