Total Posts:28|Showing Posts:1-28
Jump to topic:

Voice All Personal Complaints

Ron-Paul
Posts: 2,557
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:16:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
After all of this jimtimmy-000ike affair and royalpaladin and 16kadams vote bombing and 15 vote bombers vote bombing one debate, I want to clear something up.

Please voice all personal complaints against me and maybe I can clear them up. I welcome 000ike to this thread.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:35:33 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
You support Ron Paul.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
MasterKage
Posts: 1,257
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:38:35 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:35:33 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You support Ron Paul.

*facepalm*
This signature is full of timey wimey wibbly wobbly stuff...
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:39:40 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:38:35 PM, MasterKage wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:35:33 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You support Ron Paul.

*facepalm*

Lol.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
my new vote is valid.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:54:04 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:38:35 PM, MasterKage wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:35:33 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
You support Ron Paul.

*facepalm*

. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘". . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ":,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:". . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . ."~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . "~,_. . . .."~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . ."=,_. . . ."-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~"; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . ."=-._. . .";,,./`. . /" . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . .."~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-"
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:02:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

000ike, why don't you just ask him a simple question about the debate to "prove" whether he read the debate or not. Like, what was 000ike's main arguments and what were jimtimmy's main arguments.
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:03:54 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

lol what difference does it make? It doesn't matter anyway, but just so you're aware, I don't believe you. I don't think you read the debate, I think you voted on whatever sentiment swayed you.

but...that's just my opinion.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:04:58 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:02:06 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

000ike, why don't you just ask him a simple question about the debate to "prove" whether he read the debate or not. Like, what was 000ike's main arguments and what were jimtimmy's main arguments.

I thought about that, but whats stopping him from running there skimming it and finding out?

I know it takes me less than a minute to go spot whatever info I need from a debate if I need to reference it.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:06:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:04:58 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:02:06 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

000ike, why don't you just ask him a simple question about the debate to "prove" whether he read the debate or not. Like, what was 000ike's main arguments and what were jimtimmy's main arguments.

I thought about that, but whats stopping him from running there skimming it and finding out?

I know it takes me less than a minute to go spot whatever info I need from a debate if I need to reference it.

Cause then at least he'll read the debate,which is what you want.
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:07:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:04:58 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:02:06 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

000ike, why don't you just ask him a simple question about the debate to "prove" whether he read the debate or not. Like, what was 000ike's main arguments and what were jimtimmy's main arguments.

I thought about that, but whats stopping him from running there skimming it and finding out?

I know it takes me less than a minute to go spot whatever info I need from a debate if I need to reference it.

finished reading! I think you lost for the reasons my RFD hold.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:08:16 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:06:07 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:04:58 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:02:06 PM, darkkermit wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:00:32 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:58:06 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:56:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:55:03 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 4:53:10 PM, 16kadams wrote:
my new vote is valid.

Your new vote is, and I quote: "reasons for args in comments"....and then you did not write anything in the comments.

On top of that, you did not read the debate, ...so in what world a vote like that is justified.

it is in the second page comments I will write them again

please do so. By the way,...you seem not to dispute the fact that you didn't read the debate/ skimmed it in 5 minutes. So, given that as the most likely scenario, how are you even qualified to vote on the debate at all?

when did I not read it? I read it once when RP pulled back her vote. If you REALLY want me too I will go through the process again...

000ike, why don't you just ask him a simple question about the debate to "prove" whether he read the debate or not. Like, what was 000ike's main arguments and what were jimtimmy's main arguments.

I thought about that, but whats stopping him from running there skimming it and finding out?

I know it takes me less than a minute to go spot whatever info I need from a debate if I need to reference it.

Cause then at least he'll read the debate,which is what you want.

no, he'll skim it and find the answer,...and even if he did read the debate, he wouldn't change his vote anyway, as that would indicate that he didn't read it in the first place. I know accusing him of not reading the debate won't lead to anything productive, but at least if he truly did not read it, he'll know that I know.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/Whatever God you believe in, stop.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:11:09 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

We were pretty much done, but just because you opened your mouth, I'm almost certain this nonsense you wrote will piss people off and start more fights. :)
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:11:49 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:11:09 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

We were pretty much done, but just because you opened your mouth, I'm almost certain this nonsense you wrote will piss people off and start more fights. :)

You were definitely not done. Just shut up and pretend that debate never occurred.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:12:58 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/ darwin/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

fixed
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:13:55 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:12:58 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/ darwin/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

fixed

Technically, yours and 000ike's would be:

For the love of the lack of God, stop.
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:15:08 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:11:49 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:11:09 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

We were pretty much done, but just because you opened your mouth, I'm almost certain this nonsense you wrote will piss people off and start more fights. :)

You were definitely not done. Just shut up and pretend that debate never occurred.

We both spent hours writing and researching that information, it not only deserves fair and honest voting, but it deserves complaint when there is a lack of fair and honest voting, so you, who did not put in any effort there...you that didn't even give a legitimate vote, butting in and shouting "shut up" like a deranged baboon is just plainly ridiculous.

If you want to be inflammatory, be my guest.
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:17:16 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:13:55 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:12:58 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:09:58 PM, Lordknukle wrote:
000ike and 16k, just shut the fvck up. That debate is so annoying that it deserves to get removed. As far as I can tell, 16k had a somewhat legitimate vote. Just because you disagree with somebody, 000ike, does not give you the right to call them a vote bomber.

For the love of God/Jesus/Allah/Buddah/ darwin/Whatever God you believe in, stop.

fixed

Technically, yours and 000ike's would be:

For the love of the lack of God, stop.

xD
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:29:55 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:24:12 PM, Ron-Paul wrote:
Do we have any real complaints (besides I support Ron Paul)?

That you think I need your permission to post on this thread...
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
Ron-Paul
Posts: 2,557
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 5:32:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 5:29:55 PM, 000ike wrote:
At 2/19/2012 5:24:12 PM, Ron-Paul wrote:
Do we have any real complaints (besides I support Ron Paul)?

That you think I need your permission to post on this thread...

You don't need permission. What made you think that?
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2012 8:00:47 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/19/2012 7:26:21 PM, johnnyboy54 wrote:
I was told there would be beer and pizza...

lol... no we have pissed of ike and ice cold VBers though.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross