Total Posts:111|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Quick Poll

royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1.
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1.
2.
3.
4.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 12:54:11 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. jimtimmy
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1.
2.
3.
4.
President of DDO
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 12:55:51 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 12:54:11 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. jimtimmy
2. 16k
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1.
2.
3.
4.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 12:59:47 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
LOL, you two are running on that ridiculous platform. Of course you are going to respond that way. I want to see what other people have to say.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 1:01:29 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. The average member of DDO
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1. The DDO elite establishment
2. Royalpaladin
3.
4.
President of DDO
Viper-King
Posts: 4,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 1:13:53 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
im in the middle...i wake up everyday afraid that those conservatives have reported me enough and ive been banned on the other hand me and inno have a good friendship so i think it would be unlikely
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 1:17:59 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 1:13:53 AM, Viper-King wrote:
im in the middle...i wake up everyday afraid that those conservatives have reported me enough and ive been banned on the other hand me and inno have a good friendship so i think it would be unlikely

Innomen doesn't take stupid reports seriously.

Roy has admitted to reporting Geo
000ike has admitted to reporting me.

Nothing happened.
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...
Zaradi
Posts: 14,125
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 1:56:14 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 1:01:29 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. The average member of DDO
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1. The DDO elite establishment
2. Royalpaladin
3.
4.

Oh wow. This made me giggle.
Want to debate? Pick a topic and hit me up! - http://www.debate.org...
Maikuru
Posts: 9,112
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 2:19:30 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 1:01:29 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. The average member of DDO
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1. The DDO elite establishment
2. Royalpaladin
3.
4.

The phrase "DDO elite establishment" made me laugh out loud and I plan to work it into conversations from here on out. I thank you.
"You assume I wouldn't want to burn this whole place to the ground."
- lamerde

https://i.imgflip.com...
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 2:21:01 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 2:19:30 AM, Maikuru wrote:
At 2/26/2012 1:01:29 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1. The average member of DDO
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1. The DDO elite establishment
2. Royalpaladin
3.
4.

The phrase "DDO elite establishment" made me laugh out loud and I plan to work it into conversations from here on out. I thank you.

You're welcome.
President of DDO
imabench
Posts: 21,216
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 2:29:56 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 2:21:01 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 2:19:30 AM, Maikuru wrote:
At 2/26/2012 1:01:29 AM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Please take the following poll. Sign in the relevant area. Please keep adding to the relevant lists.

I am in constant fear of being unjustly banned.
1.
2.
3.
4.

I am not in constant fear of being banned.
1. People who know theyve done nothing wrong and have no reason to be banned in the first place
2. Royalpaladin
3. Imabench
4. Anyone who has more common sense then the average rock

The phrase "DDO elite establishment" made me laugh out loud and I plan to work it into conversations from here on out. I thank you.


You're welcome.

fixed it
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 3:58:14 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Having been banned from a number of forums before because of my views, I must say it is a concern.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:05:32 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 3:58:14 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 12:53:46 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I am just curious-how many of you are in constant fear of being banned by innomen?

Having been banned from a number of forums before because of my views, I must say it is a concern.

Has innomen given you any cause for concern, or are you just saying this to support jimtimmy?
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:19:46 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:05:32 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
Has innomen given you any cause for concern, or are you just saying this to support jimtimmy?

I have nothing in particular against innomen. To the contrary. But in general, I do not wish to be banned from another website.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:21:35 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:19:46 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:05:32 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
Has innomen given you any cause for concern, or are you just saying this to support jimtimmy?

I have nothing in particular against innomen. To the contrary. But in general, I do not wish to be banned from another website.

I understand that, but I am specifically asking you if this community has given you rational cause to constantly feel as if you are going to be banned by the moderators.
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:25:59 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:21:35 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I understand that, but I am specifically asking you if this community has given you rational cause to constantly feel as if you are going to be banned by the moderators.

There's nothing particular about this community, no. But I'd prefer the most liberal policy possible when deciding on a president.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:25:59 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:21:35 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
I understand that, but I am specifically asking you if this community has given you rational cause to constantly feel as if you are going to be banned by the moderators.

There's nothing particular about this community, no. But I'd prefer the most liberal policy possible when deciding on a president.

You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?
Reasoning
Posts: 4,456
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.
"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:09:03 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .

That's truly our position.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:43:11 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:09:03 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .

That's truly our position.

That is false. Just last week, JT openly advocated the unjustified banning of nonentity and 000ike. The fact of the matter is that he wants to ban people who oppose him. If not, why does he plan on using his bully pulpit to force innomen to give him mod powers? If he is not going to ban anybody, he does not need those powers.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:56:53 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:43:11 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:09:03 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .

That's truly our position.

That is false. Just last week, JT openly advocated the unjustified banning of nonentity and 000ike. The fact of the matter is that he wants to ban people who oppose him. If not, why does he plan on using his bully pulpit to force innomen to give him mod powers? If he is not going to ban anybody, he does not need those powers.

To prevent banning... I can't speak fully for JT, but when he asked me to be his VP in the PM he said he wouldn't ban either of you. He wants mod powers so random people wouldn't get banned.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Thaddeus
Posts: 6,985
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:58:43 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:56:53 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:43:11 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:09:03 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .

That's truly our position.

That is false. Just last week, JT openly advocated the unjustified banning of nonentity and 000ike. The fact of the matter is that he wants to ban people who oppose him. If not, why does he plan on using his bully pulpit to force innomen to give him mod powers? If he is not going to ban anybody, he does not need those powers.

To prevent banning... I can't speak fully for JT, but when he asked me to be his VP in the PM he said he wouldn't ban either of you. He wants mod powers so random people wouldn't get banned.

Is there anyone either of you would support banning?
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:59:57 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:56:53 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:43:11 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:09:03 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:03:20 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:41:53 AM, Reasoning wrote:
At 2/26/2012 4:32:05 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
You mean the position that gives an puerile seventeen year old boy moderator powers so that he can fight a nonexistent threat by banning everyone who disagrees with him?

That's the opposite of jimtimmy's position. Jimtimmy opposes any abuse of banning powers and thinks the ban should only be applied very rarely.

I know, right? That is his position in name only .

That's truly our position.

That is false. Just last week, JT openly advocated the unjustified banning of nonentity and 000ike. The fact of the matter is that he wants to ban people who oppose him. If not, why does he plan on using his bully pulpit to force innomen to give him mod powers? If he is not going to ban anybody, he does not need those powers.

To prevent banning... I can't speak fully for JT, but when he asked me to be his VP in the PM he said he wouldn't ban either of you. He wants mod powers so random people wouldn't get banned.

How is he going to stop "random people" from being banned? He is not going to be the only mod, and Juggle can ban whomever it pleases. This makes NO SENSE unless JT wants to ban people.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:06:31 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 10:00:52 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
JT and 16k, answer Thaddy's question. Who would you consider worthy of a ban? Can we have a list?

No one that is active on this site is worthy of a ban (unless another Russian fish comes). Maybe inferno, but that can be fixed without bans.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:07:45 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 10:06:31 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:00:52 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
JT and 16k, answer Thaddy's question. Who would you consider worthy of a ban? Can we have a list?

No one that is active on this site is worthy of a ban (unless another Russian fish comes). Maybe inferno, but that can be fixed without bans.

How do you explain JT's desire to ban ike and nonentity then?
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:09:05 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 10:07:45 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:06:31 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:00:52 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
JT and 16k, answer Thaddy's question. Who would you consider worthy of a ban? Can we have a list?

No one that is active on this site is worthy of a ban (unless another Russian fish comes). Maybe inferno, but that can be fixed without bans.

How do you explain JT's desire to ban ike and nonentity then?

In a PM he told me he wouldn't ban them, and that he merely dislikes them but that is not grounds for a ban.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:13:21 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 10:09:05 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:07:45 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:06:31 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:00:52 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
JT and 16k, answer Thaddy's question. Who would you consider worthy of a ban? Can we have a list?

No one that is active on this site is worthy of a ban (unless another Russian fish comes). Maybe inferno, but that can be fixed without bans.

How do you explain JT's desire to ban ike and nonentity then?

In a PM he told me he wouldn't ban them, and that he merely dislikes them but that is not grounds for a ban.

I believe his public responses more than these hypothetical PMs. In public, he said this:

"000ike and Nonentity are making this website so unwelcoming that any new conservative member just gets assaulted with all kinds of allegations.

Lance is already thinking about leaving.

On top of this, they call any vote against them biased. And, they all go and vote on each other's debates and then accuse conservatives of doing the exact thing they are guilty of.

We need to consider banning Nonentity and 000ike for degrading this site. It is utter insanity.

I think we need to seriously consider banning both of these members before they force all of the conservatives to leave this site."
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:16:41 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 10:13:21 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:09:05 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:07:45 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:06:31 AM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 10:00:52 AM, royalpaladin wrote:
JT and 16k, answer Thaddy's question. Who would you consider worthy of a ban? Can we have a list?

No one that is active on this site is worthy of a ban (unless another Russian fish comes). Maybe inferno, but that can be fixed without bans.

How do you explain JT's desire to ban ike and nonentity then?

In a PM he told me he wouldn't ban them, and that he merely dislikes them but that is not grounds for a ban.

I believe his public responses more than these hypothetical PMs. In public, he said this:

"000ike and Nonentity are making this website so unwelcoming that any new conservative member just gets assaulted with all kinds of allegations.

Lance is already thinking about leaving.

On top of this, they call any vote against them biased. And, they all go and vote on each other's debates and then accuse conservatives of doing the exact thing they are guilty of.

We need to consider banning Nonentity and 000ike for degrading this site. It is utter insanity.

I think we need to seriously consider banning both of these members before they force all of the conservatives to leave this site."


Well in my view they should stay, I cannot speak upon JT currently. Let's wait till he's online. I never knew he sud that. Either way I do not think he wants to ban them based off of the PMs though.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross