Total Posts:16|Showing Posts:1-16
Jump to topic:

Someone debate me on this

socialpinko
Posts: 10,458
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 8:20:19 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Serk is out so I'm looking for a new challenger.

http://www.debate.org...
: At 9/29/2014 10:55:59 AM, imabench wrote:
: : At 9/29/2014 9:43:46 AM, kbub wrote:
: :
: : DDO should discredit support of sexual violence at any time and in every way.
:
: I disagree.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 8:55:47 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Yup.

Me and Thadd have rigged his house with Napalm for this crime.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
Cobo
Posts: 556
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 9:20:56 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 8:55:47 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Yup.


No wonder he has no soul....
Church of the BANHAMMER GODS priest
johnnyboy54
Posts: 6,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 9:21:08 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 8:55:47 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Yup.

Me and Thadd have rigged his house with Napalm for this crime.

Napalm is unreliable and leaves a mess. Tactical nuclear weapons are much more effective and clean.
I didn't order assholes with my whiskey.
Zaradi
Posts: 14,125
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 9:23:59 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 9:21:08 PM, johnnyboy54 wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:55:47 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Yup.

Me and Thadd have rigged his house with Napalm for this crime.

Napalm is unreliable and leaves a mess. Tactical nuclear weapons are much more effective and clean.

If you ignore the whole nuclear radiation and stuff like that, nukes are the cleanest weapons out there.
Want to debate? Pick a topic and hit me up! - http://www.debate.org...
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...
President of DDO
socialpinko
Posts: 10,458
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.
: At 9/29/2014 10:55:59 AM, imabench wrote:
: : At 9/29/2014 9:43:46 AM, kbub wrote:
: :
: : DDO should discredit support of sexual violence at any time and in every way.
:
: I disagree.
Lordknukle
Posts: 12,788
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:04:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Going with the spirit of the conversation:

/insert gay joke
"Easy is the descent to Avernus, for the door to the Underworld lies upon both day and night. But to retrace your steps and return to the breezes above- that's the task, that's the toil."
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:10:01 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.

Challenge Serk then, my reasoning was similar to Danielle's and I don't see many PUs opposed to animal rights. I'm sure there's at least one there though...
CiRrK
Posts: 670
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:22:15 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 10:10:01 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.

Challenge Serk then, my reasoning was similar to Danielle's and I don't see many PUs opposed to animal rights. I'm sure there's at least one there though...

Cirrk**** :O
socialpinko
Posts: 10,458
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:27:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 10:10:01 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.

Challenge Serk then, my reasoning was similar to Danielle's and I don't see many PUs opposed to animal rights. I'm sure there's at least one there though...

I already asked him, he declined. I suppose I'll have to drop PU then.
: At 9/29/2014 10:55:59 AM, imabench wrote:
: : At 9/29/2014 9:43:46 AM, kbub wrote:
: :
: : DDO should discredit support of sexual violence at any time and in every way.
:
: I disagree.
OMGJustinBieber
Posts: 3,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:31:48 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 10:22:15 PM, CiRrK wrote:
At 5/17/2012 10:10:01 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.

Challenge Serk then, my reasoning was similar to Danielle's and I don't see many PUs opposed to animal rights. I'm sure there's at least one there though...

Cirrk**** :O

lol, this is what I thought at first but SP used it first and theres always a chance he was referring to a different user named Serk.
socialpinko
Posts: 10,458
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 10:45:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 10:31:48 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 5/17/2012 10:22:15 PM, CiRrK wrote:
At 5/17/2012 10:10:01 PM, OMGJustinBieber wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:58:54 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 5/17/2012 9:35:31 PM, Danielle wrote:
Preference utilitarianism promotes actions that fulfill the interests of everyone involved. How would Con argue that it fulfills the interest of animals to grant them lesser rights on the basis of their species which would make it morally permissible to torture and kill them? It seems to me you'd have a much easier time finding a challenger if the debate were about speciesism in general without having preference utilitarianism be the automatically accepted framework - otherwise this seems like a VERY one-sided debate (unless I'm missing something?). I would debate you on speciesism in general, perhaps...

Serk had interesting arguments while presupposing PU.

Challenge Serk then, my reasoning was similar to Danielle's and I don't see many PUs opposed to animal rights. I'm sure there's at least one there though...

Cirrk**** :O

lol, this is what I thought at first but SP used it first and theres always a chance he was referring to a different user named Serk.

Spelling it how it's pronounced ;)
: At 9/29/2014 10:55:59 AM, imabench wrote:
: : At 9/29/2014 9:43:46 AM, kbub wrote:
: :
: : DDO should discredit support of sexual violence at any time and in every way.
:
: I disagree.
CiRrK
Posts: 670
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/17/2012 11:22:37 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Ill possibly reconsider. However I wouldnt want to do video. If your interested send me the opening with resolution, definitions and BoP
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/18/2012 1:16:17 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 5/17/2012 9:21:08 PM, johnnyboy54 wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:55:47 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 5/17/2012 8:54:40 PM, Cobo wrote:
Are you a ginger?

Yup.

Me and Thadd have rigged his house with Napalm for this crime.

Napalm is unreliable and leaves a mess. Tactical nuclear weapons are much more effective and clean.

Eh, the problem I always have is my contacts get mad when I blow up half a state.

I prefer Reaper missiles. And no, not that CoD crap, I mean good ole' Hellfire missiles fired from the Predators replacement: the Reaper.

Is considerably less expensive for me, and draws a little less attention.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-