Total Posts:91|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Fool on the hill

phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 2:59:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Why's he banned again!? He has less than a day to post his round in our debate!
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
imabench
Posts: 21,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 3:00:50 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
he got temporarily banned for getting in a very heated flame war with royal in a debate (like REALLY heated)
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 3:02:02 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 3:00:50 PM, imabench wrote:
he got temporarily banned for getting in a very heated flame war with royal in a debate (like REALLY heated)

I don't see how it was a flame war. I didn't insult him at all while we were arguing. It was pretty one-sided if you ask me.
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 3:16:42 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Link?
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 7:55:28 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 2:59:42 PM, phantom wrote:
Why's he banned again!? He has less than a day to post his round in our debate!

He'll be back Thursday night.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:13:10 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
You obviously don't know about your own thought.

The Fool: YOU ARE A DUMB FVCKING RETARD.

Tell me, without referencing emotion, why suffering is bad.

The Fool: YOU ARE A DUMB FVCKING RETARD>

I challenge you to do it.

The Fool: YOU ARE A DUMB FVCKING RETARD>

Also tell me how we can know that somebody is suffering if emotion is not expressed/felt.

The Fool: YOU ARE A DUMB FVCKING RETARD>"

I think this is probably one of the examples demonstrating Fool's egregious behavior...
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool started?
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Man-is-good
Posts: 6,871
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.
"Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto." --Terence

"I believe that the mind can be permanently profaned by the habit of attending to trivial things, so that all our thoughts shall be tinged with triviality."--Thoreau
TheHitchslap
Posts: 1,231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!
Thank you for voting!
Koopin
Posts: 12,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:02:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:59:20 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen The Fool get flustered like that.

You should see our sex chat Pms.
kfc
TheHitchslap
Posts: 1,231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:04:39 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:02:57 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:59:20 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen The Fool get flustered like that.

You should see our sex chat Pms.

DDP?
Debate dot porn?
I like the tune of that ;)
Thank you for voting!
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:13:59 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:04:39 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:02:57 PM, Koopin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:59:20 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen The Fool get flustered like that.

You should see our sex chat Pms.

DDP?
Debate dot porn?
I like the tune of that ;)

Total sausage fest.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.
YYW
Posts: 36,282
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.
Tsar of DDO
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:48:48 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

Yes, but he has been warned many times before. This was not an isolated incident, but the latest chapter in an extensive book.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

I doubt that the real issue was this particular incident. The real problem is that he continuously harasses members. The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:54:55 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

I doubt that the real issue was this particular incident. The real problem is that he continuously harasses members. The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.

Twice.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
royalpaladin
Posts: 22,357
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:56:17 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:54:55 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

I doubt that the real issue was this particular incident. The real problem is that he continuously harasses members. The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.

Twice.

Innomen banned him twice prior to airmax banning him twice
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:56:29 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:54:55 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

I doubt that the real issue was this particular incident. The real problem is that he continuously harasses members. The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.

Twice.

Twice recently. There was a third time several months ago from Innomem.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
mattrodstrom
Posts: 12,028
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:57:40 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:54:55 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.

Twice.

Is orele now a Mod?

And.. Did this happen at the same time as his sex-change?
"He who does not know how to put his will into things at least puts a meaning into them: that is, he believes there is a will in them already."

Metaphysics:
"The science.. which deals with the fundamental errors of mankind - but as if they were the fundamental truths."
airmax1227
Posts: 13,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:58:13 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

The issue wasn't just this event. There is an entire history and context that went into my decision to temp-ban the fool.
Debate.org Moderator
airmax1227
Posts: 13,240
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 9:59:04 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:54:55 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:50:15 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:47:40 PM, YYW wrote:
At 8/28/2012 9:42:14 PM, royalpaladin wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:57:07 PM, TheHitchslap wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:32:22 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:31:12 PM, Ore_Ele wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:30:06 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
At 8/28/2012 8:29:20 PM, Man-is-good wrote:
Although, I'll have to ask: how did this entire conflict between Royal and The Fool start?

Fixed.

Royal was having a debate (of which the fool was not a part of), and the Fool decided to argue it in the comments.

And it appears that the argument lasted long enough until Fool was driven to to the edge of vituperation.

Though I understand why the Fool was kicked, I don't blame the admins for that, I think Royal deserves a warning on that one too. If you look at the beginning (like comments page 23) She went on spewing crap about male inferiority through genetics. I don't know a person who wouldn't be set off by that. Keep the radical nonsense elsewhere. Anyone willing to read that piece of sh!t babble I highly recommend it!

I have every right to discuss radical opinions. This is a debate website.

I think banning the Fool, for any amount of time, based on that, was excessive. But then again, I have a less apollonian sense of patients for such things.

I doubt that the real issue was this particular incident. The real problem is that he continuously harasses members. The mods previously warned him not to engage in this type of behavior; has has now been banned about four times.

Twice.

This is the fourth I believe... If I'm not mistaken Innomen banned him twice. This is now the second time I have temp-banned the fool.
Debate.org Moderator
Viper-King
Posts: 4,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 10:01:01 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
This is preposterous. Sorry Airmax, but tbh, this is becoming a more authoritarian website. Banning the Fool for arguing his positions and having ad hominems is just idiocy. You also banned AbstractPosters this month.
mattrodstrom
Posts: 12,028
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/28/2012 10:02:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 8/28/2012 9:59:04 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
the second time I have temp-banned the fool.

Ah, it's this guy that's the mod

I suppose, at least, that's better than orele :/
"He who does not know how to put his will into things at least puts a meaning into them: that is, he believes there is a will in them already."

Metaphysics:
"The science.. which deals with the fundamental errors of mankind - but as if they were the fundamental truths."