Total Posts:51|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Hmm

Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 1:25:54 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Reporters are such nags.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
leet4A1
Posts: 1,986
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 1:49:45 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 1:45:55 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
Who reported Nags?

Wow man. I dunno but it's getting a bit ridiculous now.
"Let me tell you the truth. The truth is, 'what is'. And 'what should be' is a fantasy, a terrible terrible lie that someone gave to the people long ago. The 'what should be' never did exist, but people keep trying to live up to it. There is no 'what should be,' there is only what is." - Lenny Bruce

"Satan goes to church, did you know that?" - Godsands

"And Genisis 1 does match modern science... you just have to try really hard." - GR33K FR33K5
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 1:55:17 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 1:49:45 PM, leet4A1 wrote:
At 11/10/2009 1:45:55 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
Who reported Nags?

Wow man. I dunno but it's getting a bit ridiculous now.

I can't think of anything Nags did that could get him banned.
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
leet4A1
Posts: 1,986
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 1:56:19 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 1:55:17 PM, Chrysippus wrote:
At 11/10/2009 1:49:45 PM, leet4A1 wrote:
At 11/10/2009 1:45:55 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
Who reported Nags?

Wow man. I dunno but it's getting a bit ridiculous now.

I can't think of anything Nags did that could get him banned.

Knowing some of the *expletive deleted* on this site, he wouldn't have to do much.
"Let me tell you the truth. The truth is, 'what is'. And 'what should be' is a fantasy, a terrible terrible lie that someone gave to the people long ago. The 'what should be' never did exist, but people keep trying to live up to it. There is no 'what should be,' there is only what is." - Lenny Bruce

"Satan goes to church, did you know that?" - Godsands

"And Genisis 1 does match modern science... you just have to try really hard." - GR33K FR33K5
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 1:57:12 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
After all the heat we gave mongeese, you would think no one would ever dare report someone again. What a shame.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:12:25 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
I believe that Phil has forgotten about this website and instituted some form of automated system that bans you after being reported for the same thing twice. Phil usually censors it and lets it slide.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:14:00 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:12:25 PM, wjmelements wrote:
I believe that Phil has forgotten about this website and instituted some form of automated system that bans you after being reported for the same thing twice. Phil usually censors it and lets it slide.

He just recently created a new term, "Debate Squatter," so he obviously hasn't forgotten. Something weird's going on.
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:20:49 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
It is possible he created another account. There has been a few of them floating around lately.

Still, poor Nags. He's a good guy. If there isn't a valid reason for his ban, then I have some serious questions to ask Phil.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:22:01 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:20:49 PM, Volkov wrote:
It is possible he created another account. There has been a few of them floating around lately.

Still, poor Nags. He's a good guy. If there isn't a valid reason for his ban, then I have some serious questions to ask Phil.

I thought Nags brought a lot of good points to general discussions. How long will this "debate dot org depression" last?
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:22:17 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Perhaps someone didn't like his hilarious demotivational pics. I loved those.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:22:25 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Has Nags contacted anyone here with information on this?
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:24:36 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:22:01 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I thought Nags brought a lot of good points to general discussions. How long will this "debate dot org depression" last?

Who knows? If one more prominent member is kicked off like this, then we're probably in it for the long haul.

I wonder if it was all those examples Lwerd posted of him being rude?
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:24:39 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:22:17 PM, wjmelements wrote:
Perhaps someone didn't like his hilarious demotivational pics. I loved those.

So did I. And now they're gone.

I miss Nags already.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:26:13 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:24:36 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:22:01 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I thought Nags brought a lot of good points to general discussions. How long will this "debate dot org depression" last?

Who knows? If one more prominent member is kicked off like this, then we're probably in it for the long haul.

I wonder if it was all those examples Lwerd posted of him being rude?

Very good point. That may just be it. Didn't L name other people as well?
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:29:48 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:26:13 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:24:36 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:22:01 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I thought Nags brought a lot of good points to general discussions. How long will this "debate dot org depression" last?

Who knows? If one more prominent member is kicked off like this, then we're probably in it for the long haul.

I wonder if it was all those examples Lwerd posted of him being rude?

Very good point. That may just be it. Didn't L name other people as well?

No one else is gone.
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:30:46 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:24:39 PM, mongeese wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:22:17 PM, wjmelements wrote:
Perhaps someone didn't like his hilarious demotivational pics. I loved those.

So did I. And now they're gone.

I miss Nags already.

I second this... He was the first one here I debated. Great guy.
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:30:47 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:26:13 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
Very good point. That may just be it. Didn't L name other people as well?

It was mostly Nags she focused on, and didn't mention anyone else.

Even so, the remarks were kind of minor... I can't see Phil banning someone for it, especially given the amount of time between when he said it and now. Someone would have to report him as well for there to be any ban, I would think.
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:31:26 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:29:48 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:26:13 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:24:36 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:22:01 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
I thought Nags brought a lot of good points to general discussions. How long will this "debate dot org depression" last?

Who knows? If one more prominent member is kicked off like this, then we're probably in it for the long haul.

I wonder if it was all those examples Lwerd posted of him being rude?

Very good point. That may just be it. Didn't L name other people as well?


No one else is gone.

However, she focused much of the post on Nags, and only wrote a couple of lines about other people. I'd like to find out the real reason for Nags's banning, as I'm sure everyone else here would.
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:35:10 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:30:47 PM, Volkov wrote:
At 11/10/2009 2:26:13 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
Very good point. That may just be it. Didn't L name other people as well?

It was mostly Nags she focused on, and didn't mention anyone else.

Even so, the remarks were kind of minor... I can't see Phil banning someone for it, especially given the amount of time between when he said it and now. Someone would have to report him as well for there to be any ban, I would think.

Would Phil even read an unreported post in a long thread like that?
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 2:40:57 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 11/10/2009 2:35:10 PM, Chrysippus wrote:
Would Phil even read an unreported post in a long thread like that?

I don't know the guy so I have no idea, but you'd think that someone reasonable wouldn't bother and just send Nags a warning telling him not to do it again. The question remains if if Phil is reasonable....
Lwerd
Posts: 145
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 3:18:52 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
If my account was closed for calling someone a di<k, then why wouldn't Nags' account be closed down for some of the things that he's said? I dunno who reported him and why, but to whomever did it -- I think you're hilarious lol.
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 3:28:50 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
The site has too few active members as it is we cant stand to have more banned..

However, (and before i say this i must say i have not reported anybody) but things have gotten a little disrespectful around here i must say, members on here shouldn't be insulting others at all, this is a debating site. The banns are not unwarranted, it is unfortunate that lwerd and nags accounts got banned, I know Lwerd made a new one, and i really do hope nags gets to come back, but behavior does need to improve around here.
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 3:37:49 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
You're very wise, alex hanson.

Granted everyone gets a little hot-headed sometimes, but there is no reason for all of this BS to occur. Two prominent members were banned within a matter of days, and that is an issue we need to figure out. Yet instead of keeping our calm and trying to work things out reasonably, <some members decide to not only deride and attack others, but express their support for the continuation of these events, simply because they're bitter.

I don't want to infringe on the right of people to act how they want, but for Christ's sake, shut up and get over it. The more callous you act, the less chance there is of the situation resolving itself. This site might be about debating, but there is no reason to be at eachother's throats.
PoeJoe
Posts: 3,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/10/2009 4:55:16 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Remember when I said this was a horror movie?

One by one we die off, until we realize...we realize the killer is one of us! *dun dun dun*
Television Rot: http://tvrot.com...