Total Posts:28|Showing Posts:1-28
Jump to topic:

1Historygenius and his mob boys

qopel
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.
Daktoria
Posts: 497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 7:32:07 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

If you won all your debates, would it save the world?
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 7:57:38 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.

You gave a seven point vote against him with the RFD, "I believe con swept this one. Sorry pro. I came into this with an open mind and chose cons arguments. I did not allow my religious ideals to affect my decision making."

Maybe you don't realize it, but that was a votebomb. Definitely a votebomb.
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
000ike
Posts: 11,196
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:02:59 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.

Just browsing through your votes, all of them are lopsided in point distribution, and have a 1-2 line RFD.

You're a serial votebomber. Quit while you're ahead
"A stupid despot may constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly with the chain of their own ideas" - Michel Foucault
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:05:11 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
I counter VBed LWAV for the debate Phantom referred to. You should win now.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
1Historygenius
Posts: 1,639
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:16:17 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Yeah, because I run a mob on this site. How stupid can you be?
"The chief business of the American people is business." - Calvin Coolidge

Latest debate - Reagan was a better President than Obama: http://www.debate.org...
qopel
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:24:26 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:16:17 PM, 1Historygenius wrote:
Yeah, because I run a mob on this site. How stupid can you be?

Defending yourself from nothing?
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:25:35 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:24:26 PM, qopel wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:16:17 PM, 1Historygenius wrote:
Yeah, because I run a mob on this site. How stupid can you be?

Defending yourself from nothing?

Can you please leave?

Although... you are creating drama which always spices the site up.
ishallannoyyo
Posts: 1,034
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:25:43 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.

+1
1Historygenius
Posts: 1,639
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:26:28 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:24:26 PM, qopel wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:16:17 PM, 1Historygenius wrote:
Yeah, because I run a mob on this site. How stupid can you be?

Defending yourself from nothing?

You accused me of having mob boys. All I am doing is making legitimate RFDs and you decide the vote bomb my drone and Reagan debates.
"The chief business of the American people is business." - Calvin Coolidge

Latest debate - Reagan was a better President than Obama: http://www.debate.org...
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:28:57 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 7:57:38 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.

You gave a seven point vote against him with the RFD, "I believe con swept this one. Sorry pro. I came into this with an open mind and chose cons arguments. I did not allow my religious ideals to affect my decision making."

Maybe you don't realize it, but that was a votebomb. Definitely a votebomb.

How is making an honest decision a vote bomb? If I am not allowed to vote the way I fell, I don't think I want to be on this site.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:30:42 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:28:57 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:57:38 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:47:11 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 7:29:34 PM, qopel wrote:
1Historygenius and his mob boy LibertarianWithAVoice carpet bombed my debates.

Oh, but they get away with it, right moderators?

wink wink.

No offense but you seem like a sore loser. I voted on one of your debates and made a decision based on the debate. Sorry if it didn't turn out in your favor. In all fairness it would have been less in your favor if he would have finished. I don't vote because of how others do, I have my own mind.

You gave a seven point vote against him with the RFD, "I believe con swept this one. Sorry pro. I came into this with an open mind and chose cons arguments. I did not allow my religious ideals to affect my decision making."

Maybe you don't realize it, but that was a votebomb. Definitely a votebomb.

How is making an honest decision a vote bomb? If I am not allowed to vote the way I fell, I don't think I want to be on this site.

You didn't give a reason for your vote, your reason for decision(RFD).

You just gave him seven points. You didn't say why his sources, conduct, grammar, AND conduct were better. You just said "I think he won."
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
1Historygenius
Posts: 1,639
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:35:09 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

I wanted to give conduct to both, so because I felt he performed so well I gave him the point.
"The chief business of the American people is business." - Calvin Coolidge

Latest debate - Reagan was a better President than Obama: http://www.debate.org...
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:36:43 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:35:09 PM, 1Historygenius wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

I wanted to give conduct to both, so because I felt he performed so well I gave him the point.

Just don't give it to either. Though qoquel should auto get the conduct for not FFing.

And sources is totally unwarranted.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.
OberHerr
Posts: 13,062
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-OBERHERR'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Official Enforcer for the DDO Elite(if they existed).

"Cases are anti-town." - FourTrouble

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:01:34 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?

It's still rubbish.
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:07:10 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 9:01:34 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?

It's still rubbish.

What else do I need, champ?
qopel
Posts: 150
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:11:12 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
Here is proof if 1Historygenius' carpet bomb:
http://www.debate.org...
4 points against me because "Con was incredibly rude and outrageous. His burdens are terribly and disastrous".

http://www.debate.org...
6 points against me despite my opponent forfeiting.

http://www.debate.org...
5 point against me

http://www.debate.org...
7 points against me Claims I FF the debate when I only FF a round.

http://www.debate.org...
5 points against me

Grand Total of 27 points against me in an hour. Not a single point for me.

Total carpet vote bomb.
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:17:10 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 9:07:10 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:01:34 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?

It's still rubbish.

What else do I need, champ?

Howbout reference something in the debate for starters.
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)
LibertarianWithAVoice
Posts: 76
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:28:02 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 9:17:10 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:07:10 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:01:34 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?

It's still rubbish.

What else do I need, champ?

Howbout reference something in the debate for starters.

That's all I am doing. If you don't understand yet you never will.
phantom
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/1/2013 9:34:41 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 4/1/2013 9:28:02 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:17:10 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:07:10 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 9:01:34 PM, phantom wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:59:21 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:48:36 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:45:23 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:40:29 PM, OberHerr wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:38:30 PM, LibertarianWithAVoice wrote:
At 4/1/2013 8:33:38 PM, OberHerr wrote:
Basically, your RFD needs to state why he got/lost all those points. Which you did not.

Also, someone counter most of HIG's. Seriously, grammar for dong well? Better sources? What?

I can see arguments and conduct, but other than that, its unwarranted.

Yeah I think he won. In my mind he won. He was better at debating. What am I supposed to write. " I know he won. I said it so it's automatically law." That's not the right thing to do. If that is vote bomb then he did the same thing to me with my creationism debate.

No, your supposed to say where he lost, why, why his sources were better, why his grammar was better, why his conduct was better, ect.

You have to explain every point you give. Not just "I think he won."

Fine how do I change it? I will explain everything if it makes him stop.

Just re-vote.

Is that better? Or do I need more?

It's still rubbish.

What else do I need, champ?

Howbout reference something in the debate for starters.

That's all I am doing.

Now you have. Note before.

If you don't understand yet you never will.
"Music is a zen-like ecstatic state where you become the new man of the future, the Nietzschean merger of Apollo and Dionysus." Ray Manzarek (The Doors)