Total Posts:73|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Manpower?

ManPower
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:39:16 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
You ignorant bitch!!
Now don't you people see??!!! Trying to take away MY free-speech??!! This is what they will do when they are allowed a say in society!
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:39:42 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:39:16 PM, ManPower wrote:
You ignorant bitch!!
Now don't you people see??!!! Trying to take away MY free-speech??!! This is what they will do when they are allowed a say in society!

Care to accept the debate I sent you, ManPower?
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:40:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
The TOS does not specifically ban either trolling or sexism.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:40:48 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:39:16 PM, ManPower wrote:
You ignorant (insert thing to make my earlier post here...)!!
And while I'm posting too.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:40:57 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:39:16 PM, ManPower wrote:
You ignorant bitch!!
Now don't you people see??!!! Trying to take away MY free-speech??!! This is what they will do when they are allowed a say in society!

There's something I want to say in response to that, but I wont because I'm not that mean. :)
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:41:36 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:40:03 PM, ManPower wrote:
And your a filthy (also banned)!!

You see, Man Power, your freedom of speech isn't relevant here-- it exists outside of Phil's property.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:44:11 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
There is no gonna. Already did twice.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:45:55 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:44:11 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
There is no gonna. Already did twice.

I'm on the verge of reporting his "Raghead" comment.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:47:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:46:10 PM, ManPower wrote:
So it comes to this? I have a some far out views and am shunned

Incorrect. You use profanities and slurs and you are shunned.

If you apologize to Phil now, read the TOS, say you have read it and will abide by it, and abide by it from here on out, you will likely be allowed to stay on this site. The TOS permits all manner of far out views. I am a living example to this.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Frodobaggins
Posts: 602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 8:48:21 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:46:10 PM, ManPower wrote:
So it comes to this? I have a some far out views and am shunned. This is pathetic.

You're a slut whose mother never loved you
Logical-Master
Posts: 2,538
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:04:34 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:40:09 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
The TOS does not specifically ban either trolling or sexism.

Perhaps not the one here, but the one inside Phil's mind says otherwise.
Frodobaggins
Posts: 602
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:09:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 8:46:10 PM, ManPower wrote:
I went to the dance but no one asked me to dance. I cried all last night.

Sorry about your luck man :(
Lexicaholic
Posts: 526
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?
http://mastersofcreationrpg.com... - My new site and long-developed project. Should be fun.
ManPower
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.
Cody_Franklin
Posts: 9,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?
ManPower
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.
Cody_Franklin
Posts: 9,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:52:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Okay - why are they lesser beings?
ManPower
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:53:33 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:52:06 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Okay - why are they lesser beings?

They are neither as able bodied nor able minded
Cody_Franklin
Posts: 9,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 9:55:19 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:53:33 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:52:06 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Okay - why are they lesser beings?

They are neither as able bodied nor able minded

Can you prove that?
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 10:03:05 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Really?
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 10:06:36 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Just by this you're making men seem like the lesser being--as if they're savages or something who have every right to abuse women.
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/13/2010 10:08:39 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/13/2010 10:06:36 PM, InsertNameHere wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:48:25 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:44:29 PM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:41:59 PM, ManPower wrote:
At 1/13/2010 9:34:29 PM, Lexicaholic wrote:
Wow, this is rather extreme. I just went through your profile ... estate taxes only for women? Really? That's just too funny a thought for words. But seriously, aside from your belief that women are not equal to men, why do you assume that women are worthy of punishment, i.e. being burdened with hardships above and beyond men?

Just as we can justly take advantage of animals and use them for our trivial amusement without giving them the same title in society as we do, so should be done to women on a different level.

Why?

Because they are lesser beings.

Just by this you're making men seem like the lesser being--as if they're savages or something who have every right to abuse women.

Exactly.