Total Posts:7|Showing Posts:1-7
Jump to topic:

ELO Formula

SeventhProfessor
Posts: 5,087
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/8/2014 5:07:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 2/8/2014 4:50:05 PM, xXCryptoXx wrote:
bump de bump

I know one of you knows.

Nope. Only Ore_Ele knows, and it's a secret he's taking to the grave.
#UnbanTheMadman

#StandWithBossy

#BetOnThett

"bossy r u like 85 years old and have lost ur mind"
~mysteriouscrystals

"I've honestly never seen seventh post anything that wasn't completely idiotic in a trying-to-be-funny way."
~F-16

https://docs.google.com...
Bullish
Posts: 3,527
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/8/2014 5:50:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Might not be 100% acurate:

http://www.debate.org...
At 8/17/2013 7:49:09 AM, Subutai wrote:
Here's the equation.

W = winner's original ELO
L = loser's original ELO
D = change in ELO

D = 100*(W+9L)/10W

And there is a 25 point instigator advantage (meaning the instigator gets +25 and the contender gets -25).

So unless you instigate a debate and the contender is someone with an ELO of 6 times yours, you will lose ELO points if you lose.
0x5f3759df
zmikecuber
Posts: 4,093
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/8/2014 6:22:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 2/8/2014 10:29:57 AM, xXCryptoXx wrote:
Give me teh ELO formula that was created by Ore_ele

I've been wondering that alot myself lately.... It almost makes no sense at times. I think it has something to do with your opponent's ELO or wins or amounts of debates too.
"Delete your fvcking sig" -1hard

"primal man had the habit, when he came into contact with fire, of satisfying the infantile desire connected with it, by putting it out with a stream of his urine... Putting out the fire by micturating was therefore a kind of sexual act with a male, an enjoyment of sexual potency in a homosexual competition."
xXCryptoXx
Posts: 5,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/8/2014 6:25:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 2/8/2014 5:50:53 PM, Bullish wrote:
Might not be 100% acurate:

http://www.debate.org...
At 8/17/2013 7:49:09 AM, Subutai wrote:
Here's the equation.

W = winner's original ELO
L = loser's original ELO
D = change in ELO

D = 100*(W+9L)/10W

And there is a 25 point instigator advantage (meaning the instigator gets +25 and the contender gets -25).

So unless you instigate a debate and the contender is someone with an ELO of 6 times yours, you will lose ELO points if you lose.

This doesn't make sense because doing the math I should be getting about 50 ELO per debate win with a noob, but that's completely false. Instead I get about 20.
Nolite Timere
Bullish
Posts: 3,527
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/8/2014 7:00:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 2/8/2014 6:25:15 PM, xXCryptoXx wrote:
At 2/8/2014 5:50:53 PM, Bullish wrote:
Might not be 100% acurate:

http://www.debate.org...
At 8/17/2013 7:49:09 AM, Subutai wrote:
Here's the equation.

W = winner's original ELO
L = loser's original ELO
D = change in ELO

D = 100*(W+9L)/10W

And there is a 25 point instigator advantage (meaning the instigator gets +25 and the contender gets -25).

So unless you instigate a debate and the contender is someone with an ELO of 6 times yours, you will lose ELO points if you lose.

This doesn't make sense because doing the math I should be getting about 50 ELO per debate win with a noob, but that's completely false. Instead I get about 20.

100*(3666+9*2000)/(10*3666) = 59

There is a +/- 25 points for debate instigation. So if you win a noob by accepting his debate, you get 34 elo points according to that equation.
0x5f3759df