Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

athiestman. Votebomber?

Cherymenthol
Posts: 158
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 7:42:38 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I am begging to feel he his.

here are a few exampled:

http://www.debate.org... (comments section)

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

There are a few more examples but it is getting late. However I would just like to call to attention the lack of RFD's and logic in voting, following voting trends he tends to be a statistic anomaly voting on whomever he agrees with rather than actual cogency, coherence, nor conduct. If I am in correct please tell me but if I not I urge action be taken against him.
MikeLoviN
Posts: 746
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 7:54:47 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
News flash. Nobody really cares anymore. The Mods aren't going to kill accounts just because they are labeled by other members as vote-bombers (even if they admit to bombing). Unfortunately the only thing you can really do is ... well nothing. If you are that concerned about vote bombing, on an online debate forum no less, then I'd say that you have bigger issues. Just ignore them and take solace in the fact that you are probably much less pathetic than that person. There's been far too much drama going on about this lately... let's just give it a rest shall we?
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 8:12:39 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I actually find atheistman's voting tendencies to be hilarious (albeit, sometimes unjust). He goes onto every single religious debate and is the first one to give all 7s to the atheist debater, or the debater arguing against religion.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 8:15:03 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
He's definitely a votebomber. He appeared in most of my debates (especially religious ones) to give all seven to my opponent.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 8:18:45 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/25/2010 8:15:20 PM, Cherymenthol wrote:
I don't know why he picks on me?

I never get into religious debates.

Yeah, he mostly votes on religious debates, but I have seen him vote on political debates once in awhile, not just yours. Plus, he said that he gives straight 7s no matter what.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Cherymenthol
Posts: 158
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 8:22:21 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/25/2010 8:18:45 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
At 1/25/2010 8:15:20 PM, Cherymenthol wrote:
I don't know why he picks on me?

I never get into religious debates.

Yeah, he mostly votes on religious debates, but I have seen him vote on political debates once in awhile, not just yours. Plus, he said that he gives straight 7s no matter what.

Its. dumb I wish he would stop.

He's not alone but just if he left even a stinkin RFD it would be better....
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 8:30:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/25/2010 8:22:21 PM, Cherymenthol wrote:

Yeah, he mostly votes on religious debates, but I have seen him vote on political debates once in awhile, not just yours. Plus, he said that he gives straight 7s no matter what.

Its. dumb I wish he would stop.

I don't think there's anything wrong with giving straight 7s. If you've read any of my threads about voting from a few weeks ago, I've said that I think the various categories in many debates are retarded (such as sources, spelling, etc.) and the only thing that really matters to me in most cases is arguments. If I think a debater's arguments are way better, I might give them 7 points because I think the other categories can be irrelevant... especially if the person I think should be winning is losing. Plus I love watching people cry about it - haha! There's no rule that says we have to vote according to the standards the mod set up; most of the time spelling and sources aren't even an issue let alone something I think we should be voting on. That's not to say that you weren't v-bombed though and I'm sorry if it happened to you... I'll check out some of your debates in a bit and read through them/vote if I have time.
President of DDO
PoeJoe
Posts: 3,822
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/25/2010 9:02:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 1/25/2010 8:48:24 PM, Rob1Billion wrote:
This is laissez faire voting. Do what you can to win the debate.

If only there were heavy regulation...
Television Rot: http://tvrot.com...
nickthengineer
Posts: 251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/26/2010 5:28:02 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
a 7 point vote is almost always an indicator of vote bombing and can be determined simply from looking at the spelling and grammar of each debater. when 7 is given it is more often than not obvious that the spelling was actually tied. rarely is spelling so bad that someone deserves this point.
I evolved from stupid. (http://www.debate.org...)