Total Posts:40|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

An open invitation

bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
Raisor
Posts: 4,461
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 7:53:22 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

not sure if joking...
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 7:54:34 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

As you know, everyone will argue your RFD with you, even if it's right. I think if people are really convinced an RFD is wrong, they should be willing to stake another loss on it.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 8:02:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

Or was this addressed to "others"?
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
Raisor
Posts: 4,461
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2014 8:29:16 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 8:02:42 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

Or was this addressed to "others"?

It was a joke.
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 10:13:14 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 8:29:16 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 8:02:42 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

Or was this addressed to "others"?

It was a joke.

She couldn't even detect a simple joke. Are you sure she's good at judging things? I'm half-tempted to give her a chocolate-drop of intelligence.
ADreamOfLiberty
Posts: 1,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 12:18:19 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

God I love you. You are now officially the anti-YYW.
LOL, yeah, it's pretty amazing how they think they can "reason" with you. - Sidewalker, speaking of advocates for sexual deviancy.

So, my advice, Liberty, is to go somewhere else. Leave, and never come back. - YYW

And that's what I did. Contact me at http://www.edeb8.com... by the same user name if you have anything you'd like to say.
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 8:57:35 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

I agree with Raisor. You focus on pedantic details and overlook major impacts, fail to understand them or it just goes over your head. That's not meant as a personal attack by the way, it's just the reality of how you judge debates.
Tsar of DDO
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:05:25 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 8:57:35 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

I agree with Raisor. You focus on pedantic details and overlook major impacts, fail to understand them or it just goes over your head. That's not meant as a personal attack by the way, it's just the reality of how you judge debates.

lol. "You focus on dumb stuff and overlook the main issue; you are either too stupid to understand the main point or you miss the main point because you are too stupid. That's not meant as a personal attack by the way, it's just reality."

okay, please explain how you define: personal attack.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:06:56 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:05:25 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 8:57:35 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:41:10 PM, Raisor wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Maybe just stop sucking at judging

I agree with Raisor. You focus on pedantic details and overlook major impacts, fail to understand them or it just goes over your head. That's not meant as a personal attack by the way, it's just the reality of how you judge debates.

lol. "You focus on dumb stuff and overlook the main issue; you are either too stupid to understand the main point or you miss the main point because you are too stupid. That's not meant as a personal attack by the way, it's just reality."

okay, please explain how you define: personal attack.

lol It's interesting how you rewrote what I said. Pedantic details are not "dumb stuff" and I never said you were stupid, either. But w/e.
Tsar of DDO
Subutai
Posts: 3,216
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:10:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Does anyone remember the Mouthwash/Danielle debacle, and see a slew of 30 debates all spawning from the same original debate, clogging up the site with flame wars instead of intellectual discourse? If you have a problem with an RFD that is not votebomb material, calmly explain so in the comments.
I'm becoming less defined as days go by, fading away, and well you might say, I'm losing focus, kinda drifting into the abstract in terms of how I see myself.
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.
Tsar of DDO
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice. Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol
Tsar of DDO
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.
Tsar of DDO
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.
Tsar of DDO
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:34:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during intercourse.
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:35:23 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during interc0urse.
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:36:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:35:23 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during interc0urse.

That's weird. It gave me a lewd error on intercourse, although it actually posted.
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:38:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:34:51 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during intercourse.

By that definition, no, I don't prefer my guys like that. I prefer them 19-24, slim to toned and around 6 feet tall. Although, I can't imagine having any kind of a relationship with an excessively pious and narrow minded person. I enjoy that you think I am both of those things, though.
Tsar of DDO
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:52:09 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:38:44 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:34:51 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during intercourse.

By that definition, no, I don't prefer my guys like that. I prefer them 19-24, slim to toned and around 6 feet tall. Although, I can't imagine having any kind of a relationship with an excessively pious and narrow minded person. I enjoy that you think I am both of those things, though.

Don't be daft, I don't think you're either of those things, but I do believe you once showed that you carry a somewhat extremely negative perspective on what you deem to be obscene, which could have changed in you, I'm not sure, and so I rather we privately discuss your issue with obscene discussions on DDO or in life, generally. I've been watching movies recommended as movies with philosophical depth, and the last three I watched all happened to focus on the people's reaction to obscene material, and so it would be lovely if you can watch them too and comment on them, perhaps so we can have a reasonable discussion.
YYW
Posts: 36,289
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 9:54:29 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:52:09 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:38:44 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:34:51 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during intercourse.

By that definition, no, I don't prefer my guys like that. I prefer them 19-24, slim to toned and around 6 feet tall. Although, I can't imagine having any kind of a relationship with an excessively pious and narrow minded person. I enjoy that you think I am both of those things, though.

Don't be daft, I don't think you're either of those things, but I do believe you once showed that you carry a somewhat extremely negative perspective on what you deem to be obscene, which could have changed in you, I'm not sure, and so I rather we privately discuss your issue with obscene discussions on DDO or in life, generally. I've been watching movies recommended as movies with philosophical depth, and the last three I watched all happened to focus on the people's reaction to obscene material, and so it would be lovely if you can watch them too and comment on them, perhaps so we can have a reasonable discussion.

What are those movies?
Tsar of DDO
NiqashMotawadi3
Posts: 1,895
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 10:01:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:54:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:52:09 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:38:44 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:34:51 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:29:30 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:28:15 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:19:13 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:17:18 PM, NiqashMotawadi3 wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:14:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:13:13 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:18 PM, YYW wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:09:18 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
Please...no flame war. Not again. Don't give CP the ammo.

haha, there's not going to be a flamewar. Bluesteel is just sensitive.

you can't openly insult people, and say "this isn't an insult" and expect that to suffice.

I didn't say it wasn't an insult. I said it wasn't meant as an insult. I guess you missed that...

Raisor was joking. You piled on and were serious. I'd say "debate me" on me being a bad judge, but I know you won't and you're honestly not worth the mental energy.

Ouch. lol

Bluesteel seems to have a crush on you. Shake hands and make love. No need for war. Oh wait, you're not into women.

He does, you're right. He's actually a guy, btw. But, he's not my type. I'm sure he's a nice fellow irl though.

Lol. Do you like your guys "churchy?"

I'm not sure what that means, but I would never date an atheist.

Churchy means "excessively pious and consequently narrow-minded or intolerant." And it's not true what they say about atheists, they do say "Oh God" during intercourse.

By that definition, no, I don't prefer my guys like that. I prefer them 19-24, slim to toned and around 6 feet tall. Although, I can't imagine having any kind of a relationship with an excessively pious and narrow minded person. I enjoy that you think I am both of those things, though.

Don't be daft, I don't think you're either of those things, but I do believe you once showed that you carry a somewhat extremely negative perspective on what you deem to be obscene, which could have changed in you, I'm not sure, and so I rather we privately discuss your issue with obscene discussions on DDO or in life, generally. I've been watching movies recommended as movies with philosophical depth, and the last three I watched all happened to focus on the people's reaction to obscene material, and so it would be lovely if you can watch them too and comment on them, perhaps so we can have a reasonable discussion.

What are those movies?

Kinsey (sex professor raises controversy), Capturing the Friedmans(father and son are pedophiles accused of child-molestation) and The people against Larry Flint (controversy raised by the Hustler magazine founder).
ADreamOfLiberty
Posts: 1,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 10:03:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 9:10:13 PM, Subutai wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Does anyone remember the Mouthwash/Danielle debacle, and see a slew of 30 debates all spawning from the same original debate, clogging up the site with flame wars instead of intellectual discourse? If you have a problem with an RFD that is not votebomb material, calmly explain so in the comments.

There is nothing intellectual about taking an RFD and the vote its attached to as gospel. It's a petty delusion entertained by fools who never understood debate in the first place.
LOL, yeah, it's pretty amazing how they think they can "reason" with you. - Sidewalker, speaking of advocates for sexual deviancy.

So, my advice, Liberty, is to go somewhere else. Leave, and never come back. - YYW

And that's what I did. Contact me at http://www.edeb8.com... by the same user name if you have anything you'd like to say.
Subutai
Posts: 3,216
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 10:08:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 10:03:55 PM, ADreamOfLiberty wrote:
At 3/23/2014 9:10:13 PM, Subutai wrote:
At 3/22/2014 7:12:45 PM, bluesteel wrote:
If anyone ever thinks that my RFD on one of your debates is wrong, you have an open invitation to debate me on whether you won the debate [Resolved: X person won his debate with Y person].

See, e.g., http://www.debate.org...

I'm not going to argue my RFD's in comments sections anymore. From now on, this is my way of adjudicating disputes with my RFD's.

I think others should do the same.

Does anyone remember the Mouthwash/Danielle debacle, and see a slew of 30 debates all spawning from the same original debate, clogging up the site with flame wars instead of intellectual discourse? If you have a problem with an RFD that is not votebomb material, calmly explain so in the comments.

There is nothing intellectual about taking an RFD and the vote its attached to as gospel. It's a petty delusion entertained by fools who never understood debate in the first place.

That wasn't my point.
I'm becoming less defined as days go by, fading away, and well you might say, I'm losing focus, kinda drifting into the abstract in terms of how I see myself.
ADreamOfLiberty
Posts: 1,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2014 10:10:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 3/23/2014 10:08:36 PM, Subutai wrote:
At 3/23/2014 10:03:55 PM, ADreamOfLiberty wrote:
There is nothing intellectual about taking an RFD and the vote its attached to as gospel. It's a petty delusion entertained by fools who never understood debate in the first place.

That wasn't my point.

No your point was, let it go because nobody wants to see you arguing forever about the same thing. Ha! Too bad. It's a debate site not an entertainment program.
LOL, yeah, it's pretty amazing how they think they can "reason" with you. - Sidewalker, speaking of advocates for sexual deviancy.

So, my advice, Liberty, is to go somewhere else. Leave, and never come back. - YYW

And that's what I did. Contact me at http://www.edeb8.com... by the same user name if you have anything you'd like to say.