Total Posts:31|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

What the heck is a "troll" debate or poll?

Jifpop09
Posts: 2,243
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 7:36:29 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

This would be a good example of a troll forum ;)
Leader of the DDO Revolution Party
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 8:26:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

It's something people like Jifpop do.
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Jifpop09
Posts: 2,243
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 8:29:12 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 8:26:07 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

It's something people like Jifpop do.

-_- I love how you insult me, but cower from debate
Leader of the DDO Revolution Party
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 8:32:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 8:29:12 PM, Jifpop09 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:26:07 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

It's something people like Jifpop do.

-_- I love how you insult me, but cower from debate

I don't cower from debates. I ignore them when you don't ask for. I didn't even see what the debate was about aside from Microeconomics. What was it?

But seriously. You don't go to a random person and send a spontaneous challenge out of nowhere, and expect them to accept it.
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Jifpop09
Posts: 2,243
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 8:33:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 8:32:21 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:29:12 PM, Jifpop09 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:26:07 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

It's something people like Jifpop do.

-_- I love how you insult me, but cower from debate

I don't cower from debates. I ignore them when you don't ask for. I didn't even see what the debate was about aside from Microeconomics. What was it?

But seriously. You don't go to a random person and send a spontaneous challenge out of nowhere, and expect them to accept it.

Fair enough. It was on raising Progressive Wage Rates for the rich
Leader of the DDO Revolution Party
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol
I may or may not be a cat
Zaradi
Posts: 14,123
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:05:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 8:29:12 PM, Jifpop09 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:26:07 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

It's something people like Jifpop do.

-_- I love how you insult me, but cower from debate

It's something people like Jifpop do.
Want to debate? Pick a topic and hit me up! - http://www.debate.org...
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply
I may or may not be a cat
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
Zaradi
Posts: 14,123
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.
Want to debate? Pick a topic and hit me up! - http://www.debate.org...
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:27:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

i meant that you replied to the wrong post
I may or may not be a cat
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?
I may or may not be a cat
Zaradi
Posts: 14,123
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.
Want to debate? Pick a topic and hit me up! - http://www.debate.org...
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!
I may or may not be a cat
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:59:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

lol, I love how you watched until the end though. That's the irony of boxxy; she's so annoying, but no one stops watching the video.

And I was replying to your post, explaining how most of the responses were responsive. Even people who are just trolling in this thread are being helpful by providing helpful examples of trolling.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
bluesteel
Posts: 12,301
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 9:59:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

lol, I love how you watched until the end though. That's the irony of boxxy; she's so annoying, but no one stops watching the video.

And I was replying to your post, explaining how most of the responses were responsive. Even people who are just trolling in this thread are being helpful by providing helpful examples of trolling.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into - Jonathan Swift (paraphrase)
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 10:32:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:59:48 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

lol, I love how you watched until the end though. That's the irony of boxxy; she's so annoying, but no one stops watching the video.

And I was replying to your post, explaining how most of the responses were responsive. Even people who are just trolling in this thread are being helpful by providing helpful examples of trolling.

I didnt watch it all the way.... I stopped after the first few seconds.... O.o
I may or may not be a cat
Pitbull15
Posts: 479
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/24/2014 10:41:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

Basically, it's a debate or poll saying somethng along the lines of "EVILUTION IS EVIL BCUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE AND BIBLE SEZ WE WERECREATES CUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE ANBIBLE IS RIGHT BECUZ ITS BIBLE!!!!11!"
zmikecuber and I debate the Modal Ontological Argument
http://www.debate.org...

"YOU ARE A TOTAL MORON!!! LOL!!!- invisibledeity

"I have shown incredible restraint in the face of unrelenting stupidity."-Izbo10

"Oh my God, WHO THE HELL CARES?!"-Peter Griffin

"Let me put this in Spanish for you: NO!!"-Jase Robertson
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 12:19:04 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 10:41:18 PM, Pitbull15 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?


Basically, it's a debate or poll saying somethng along the lines of "EVILUTION IS EVIL BCUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE AND BIBLE SEZ WE WERECREATES CUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE ANBIBLE IS RIGHT BECUZ ITS BIBLE!!!!11!"

That's not trolling that's legitimately the type of stuff my holy roller sister says. Except with gooder spelling.
Linkish1O2
Posts: 2,003
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 2:32:11 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!

why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Your sarcasm is redundant as well.
"I am a mystery and to unlock the mystery at my core, one must simply embrace slendermans hug with no fear."- me

"I hearby declare myself a phantom in the darkness."-me
Mhykiel
Posts: 5,987
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 1:52:03 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/24/2014 10:41:18 PM, Pitbull15 wrote:
Basically, it's a debate or poll saying somethng along the lines of "EVILUTION IS EVIL BCUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE AND BIBLE SEZ WE WERECREATES CUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE ANBIBLE IS RIGHT BECUZ ITS BIBLE!!!!11!"

Really I thought trolling was like,

GUD IS DEAD BESAUSE I REPEAT WHAT SO MANY UTUBE VIDEOS SAY SO, AND THE BRAIN BETWEEN MY EARS SAYS SO, SO... I HAVE REASONS , CAUSE THATS WHAT BRAINS DO THEY REASON. YOU BIBLE THUMPER DONT USE YOUR BRAIN, AND PROOF IS WE DONT KNOW ANYTHING FOR 1000% CERTAIN SO MY FAKE SHIZIT IS REAL.
9spaceking
Posts: 4,213
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 3:04:39 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Okay, so here's a great example of trolling. If I wanted to troll this thread, I'd probably say something along the lines of this....
"The atoms of radioactive isotopes are unstable have a fixed decay over time by dischargeing particles at a fixed rate, transforming the material into a stable substance. For example, half the mass of carbon-14,
(the hardest substance known to mankind)

Is an unstable isotope of carbon, and decays into nitrogen-14 over a fixed time period.
The regularity of this decay allows scientists to determine the age of extremely old organic materials.

With a high degree of precision. The decay of uranium-238, has a half-life of nearly 4.5 billion years, enabled geologists to determine the age of the Earth.

Many scientists, including Marie and Pierre Curie, Ernest Rutherford and George de Hevesy, have tried to influence the rate of radioactive decay to try and test the true accuracy of dateing by radically changing the pressure, temperature, magnetic field, acceleration, or radiation environment of the source. No experiment to date has detected any change in rates of decay.

Therefore we can all come to the conclusion that since P1 and P2 are valid and backed by evidence and science the age of the earth is over 10,000 years old."

(because it has NOTHING to do with the topic and it doesn't make any sense)
FOR MOAR EXAMPLES: see my "Favorite troll debate" and my funniest debate, all in my signature below.
Equestrian election
http://www.debate.org...

This House would impose democracy
http://www.debate.org...

Reign of Terror is unjustified
http://www.debate.org...

Raise min. wage to $10.10
http://www.debate.org...
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/25/2014 4:30:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/25/2014 2:32:11 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!

why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Your sarcasm is redundant as well.

theyre call rhetorical questions, aka sarcasm
my sarcasm wasnt redundant.... i didnt repeat myself, i emphasized myself
I may or may not be a cat
Linkish1O2
Posts: 2,003
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/26/2014 1:00:46 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/25/2014 4:30:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/25/2014 2:32:11 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!

why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Your sarcasm is redundant as well.

theyre call rhetorical questions, aka sarcasm
There is no such thing as a rhetorical question on a thread, clearly you wanted it answered because you asked it in a large forum.
my sarcasm wasnt redundant.... i didnt repeat myself, i emphasized myself
Maybe you should look up the word redundant before you post a comment that absolutely makes no sense.
"I am a mystery and to unlock the mystery at my core, one must simply embrace slendermans hug with no fear."- me

"I hearby declare myself a phantom in the darkness."-me
Intrepid
Posts: 372
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/26/2014 1:07:14 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/25/2014 12:19:04 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 4/24/2014 10:41:18 PM, Pitbull15 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?


Basically, it's a debate or poll saying somethng along the lines of "EVILUTION IS EVIL BCUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE AND BIBLE SEZ WE WERECREATES CUZ BIBLE IS BIBLE ANBIBLE IS RIGHT BECUZ ITS BIBLE!!!!11!"

That's not trolling that's legitimately the type of stuff my holy roller sister says. Except with gooder spelling.

Gooder lol
AngelofDeath
Posts: 2,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/26/2014 10:53:27 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/26/2014 1:00:46 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/25/2014 4:30:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/25/2014 2:32:11 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!

why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Your sarcasm is redundant as well.

theyre call rhetorical questions, aka sarcasm
There is no such thing as a rhetorical question on a thread, clearly you wanted it answered because you asked it in a large forum.
....

my sarcasm wasnt redundant.... i didnt repeat myself, i emphasized myself
Maybe you should look up the word redundant before you post a comment that absolutely makes no sense.
I did too make sense. Emphasizing your words is different from merely repeating yourself. -_-
I may or may not be a cat
Linkish1O2
Posts: 2,003
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/26/2014 3:17:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/26/2014 10:53:27 AM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/26/2014 1:00:46 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/25/2014 4:30:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/25/2014 2:32:11 AM, Linkish1O2 wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:42:28 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:31:21 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:29:15 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:26:00 PM, Zaradi wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:16:24 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:12:20 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 9:11:14 PM, bluesteel wrote:
At 4/24/2014 8:40:55 PM, AngelofDeath wrote:
At 4/24/2014 7:31:18 PM, EliasPredko wrote:
Well? What is it?

i love how no one actually answers his question, just kinda uses this forum to stray off-topic and argue about random stuff lol

Actually, you can prove a fact through inductive reasoning (starting with general propositions that you can use to prove a specific case exists) or deductive reasoning (starting with a specific case from which you can derive general propositions).

The answer "Something that jifpop would do" *is* responsive as it allows deductive reasoning. It just seems non-responsive because the OP probably wanted inductive reasoning that would be more helpful in identifying future cases.

wrong reply

There are no right replies.

F*ck you and your boxxy bullsh*t.

what did i just waste my life watching?

Boxxy.

Really? I would've never guessed from the title or anything!!! Thanks soooo much for enlightening me!

why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Your sarcasm is redundant as well.

theyre call rhetorical questions, aka sarcasm
There is no such thing as a rhetorical question on a thread, clearly you wanted it answered because you asked it in a large forum.
....

my sarcasm wasnt redundant.... i didnt repeat myself, i emphasized myself
Maybe you should look up the word redundant before you post a comment that absolutely makes no sense.
I did too make sense. Emphasizing your words is different from merely repeating yourself. -_-

Redundant does not mean repetitive, it means it's unneeded, useless information, not wanted around here. Where the heck are you getting repeated?
"I am a mystery and to unlock the mystery at my core, one must simply embrace slendermans hug with no fear."- me

"I hearby declare myself a phantom in the darkness."-me