Total Posts:139|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

What is it this time? (Regarding Vi

Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:53:49 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
http://www.debate.org...

Vi_veri's account has been closed.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:56:01 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Lol 20 seconds difference.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:57:12 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
And mine was first :P
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
#6
Add Post
Forum Moderator
 
2/25/2010 3:57:19 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I closed her account because she posted a disgusting sexually-explicit comment on the site. Since she has received more than her fair share of warnings in the past, I've decided it's time for her to move on. If you can't debate without insults, then you're not welcome here. Let it be written.
GeoLaureate8
Posts: 12,252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:58:14 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Wth, I just posted a comment on her profile 2 minutes ago.
"We must raise the standard of the Old, free, decentralized, and strictly limited Republic."
-- Murray Rothbard

"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
-- Frederic Bastiat
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:59:02 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Tell us what disgusting sexually explicit comment it was pretty please?

On a more serious note, Lwerd and Vi are the two worst possible people to ban if you want the site to continue to receive traffic.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:59:42 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 3:58:14 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Wth, I just posted a comment on her profile 2 minutes ago.

That's how I found out, I clicked to see your comment from the friends feed :P
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 3:59:57 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 3:59:02 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
Tell us what disgusting sexually explicit comment it was pretty please?

On a more serious note, Lwerd and Vi are the two worst possible people to ban if you want the site to continue to receive traffic.

Seriously!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I nearly had a heartattack.......
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:00:17 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 3:59:42 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 2/25/2010 3:58:14 PM, GeoLaureate8 wrote:
Wth, I just posted a comment on her profile 2 minutes ago.

That's how I found out, I clicked to see your comment from the friends feed :P

Dito
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:00:32 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 3:59:02 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
Tell us what disgusting sexually explicit comment it was pretty please?

Indeed. I would also like to know.

On a more serious note, Lwerd and Vi are the two worst possible people to ban if you want the site to continue to receive traffic.

How so?
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:00:32 PM, Nags wrote:
On a more serious note, Lwerd and Vi are the two worst possible people to ban if you want the site to continue to receive traffic.

How so?
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
popculturepooka
Posts: 7,926
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:03:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
I'm fairly certain I know which comment it was.

It's from the comment section in this debate:

http://www.debate.org...

It was removed but True Patriot quoted it so....
At 10/3/2016 11:49:13 PM, thett3 wrote:
BLACK LIVES MATTER!
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:04:22 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?

I think you're exaggerating quite a bit.

Anyways, 'tis odd, isn't it. She must have said something to p*ss someone off... anyone seen any derogatory comments from her lately?
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:04:37 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?

Ehh, not really. They're over-rated and a wee bit full of themselves in my opinion.

Besides, the ones that drool over them are established members, not noobies. There are other forums for drooling over females anyway.
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:07:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Just in case anybody is wondering, I did not report her. I'm pretty sure that TruePatriot did, though, given his comment.
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:10:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:04:37 PM, Nags wrote:
At 2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?

Ehh, not really. They're over-rated and a wee bit full of themselves in my opinion.

Besides, the ones that drool over them are established members, not noobies. There are other forums for drooling over females anyway.

Over-rated? How so?
True2GaGa
Posts: 1,574
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:10:42 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:07:41 PM, mongeese wrote:
Just in case anybody is wondering, I did not report her. I'm pretty sure that TruePatriot did, though, given his comment.

Seconded.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:11:12 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
That doesn't look all that explicit to me. Hell, if anything the guy who quoted her should be banned for the slur he used to describe the reference. The AWESOME slur incidentally, but there is no reason to call it anything but a slur.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:11:28 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:10:09 PM, True2GaGa wrote:
Over-rated? How so?

See: comments like below.

At 2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:11:50 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 2/25/2010 4:10:09 PM, True2GaGa wrote:
At 2/25/2010 4:04:37 PM, Nags wrote:
At 2/25/2010 4:01:45 PM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
About 10 percent of page views consist of drooling over them?

Ehh, not really. They're over-rated and a wee bit full of themselves in my opinion.

Besides, the ones that drool over them are established members, not noobies. There are other forums for drooling over females anyway.

Over-rated? How so?

The leaderboard puts theLwerd at the top.

She's at the top because she votes 14 points to herself in most debates, and 7 in most others. As InquireTruth put it, the top of the leaderboard is a cheat.

Hence, over-rated-ness.
collegekitchen2
Posts: 51
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:15:36 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Phil is fu_cking stupid.

I mean seriously how can a comment be sexually explicit?

Apparently you don't take the time to read anything that hasn't been reported before you ban someone or you would have noticed this comment right below the comment you banned Vi for.

TruePatriot: "Kinesis, get off my comment section you liberal scum."

Besides one of the longest thread involved commoncents being drunk, him challenging members to physical fights, and everyone online trying to get nude videos from TheLwerd and Vi who were also drunk.

Face it Phil. Most of the members of this site are in college.

Here's a suggestion:

1. Only ban spammers and multi-accounters
2. Enjoy increased respect and site traffic
3. Remove the fly ads and talking ads
4. Shoot some basketball
5. ?????
6. PROFIT!!!!
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:15:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Oh, and she also vote-bombs against people who could top her in the leaderboard (Logical-Master, myself), keeping her on the top of the leaderboard unfairly.

Hence, over-rated-ness.
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2010 4:20:01 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Ya, the stuff TP was posting in that comments section was a lot worse than Vi's statement to me at least. He does a bit of gay bashing.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown