Total Posts:14|Showing Posts:1-14
Jump to topic:

Anyone Want To Debate A Neo-Lorentzian Aether

Jonbonbon
Posts: 3,042
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 10:37:08 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Bump
[Censored by Airmax]

Writing Queen of DDO

Check out the latest episode of Nautilus:
http://www.debate.org...

It's a great series... some say

If you want to see the trailer for my movie, go here:
http://www.debate.org...

"This is all just propaganda," Airmax

"Oops wrong account," UtherPenguin
Ajabi
Posts: 1,510
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 9:11:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

It postulates that there is a 3+1 Dimensional Ontology, with an aether existing of absolute time and space. So there are three dimensions of space, and one of time. And as relativity exists, there is also a certain aether which is pseudo-metaphysical, and this aether features absolute time, and absolute space. Consider it the mold breaker on all wars: I came first, no I did. :P

It would be easier if you read the Sargon's debate though.
UchihaMadara
Posts: 1,049
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 9:28:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

it doesn't matter. you can win the debate by running a kritik regarding how houses are incapable of 'believing' things, since they are inanimate objects.
n7
Posts: 1,465
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
404 coherent debate topic not found. Please restart the debate with clear resolution.


Uphold Marxist-Leninist-Maoist-Sargonist-n7ism.
n7
Posts: 1,465
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 11:36:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
I meant to just post the wiki, not the anchor.
404 coherent debate topic not found. Please restart the debate with clear resolution.


Uphold Marxist-Leninist-Maoist-Sargonist-n7ism.
Wylted
Posts: 23,429
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 11:37:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 11:36:11 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
I meant to just post the wiki, not the anchor.

That's right, I briefly touched on this theory in my flat Earth debate. I needed some psuedo science to support my psuedo science.
Wylted
Posts: 23,429
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 11:39:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I actually joined the flat earth forum to get help with investigating my flat Earth debate, but those guys had worse theories than the one I dug up and weaves from different places.
UchihaMadara
Posts: 1,049
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/10/2014 11:42:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 11:37:55 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:36:11 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
I meant to just post the wiki, not the anchor.

That's right, I briefly touched on this theory in my flat Earth debate. I needed some psuedo science to support my psuedo science.

lol, you do know sargon successfully affirmed its existence, right?
http://www.debate.org...
if i'm not mistaken, he legitimately believes in it, too.
Wylted
Posts: 23,429
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2014 1:00:16 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 11:42:21 PM, UchihaMadara wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:37:55 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:36:11 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
I meant to just post the wiki, not the anchor.

That's right, I briefly touched on this theory in my flat Earth debate. I needed some psuedo science to support my psuedo science.

lol, you do know sargon successfully affirmed its existence, right?
http://www.debate.org...
if i'm not mistaken, he legitimately believes in it, too.

I've actually looked into it at one point. It seems like a hard theory to disprove.
Ajabi
Posts: 1,510
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/11/2014 5:21:26 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/11/2014 1:00:16 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:42:21 PM, UchihaMadara wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:37:55 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:36:11 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 11:34:24 PM, n7 wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

http://en.wikipedia.org...
I meant to just post the wiki, not the anchor.

That's right, I briefly touched on this theory in my flat Earth debate. I needed some psuedo science to support my psuedo science.

lol, you do know sargon successfully affirmed its existence, right?
http://www.debate.org...
if i'm not mistaken, he legitimately believes in it, too.

I've actually looked into it at one point. It seems like a hard theory to disprove.

It is not one bit pseudo-scientific. It is absolutely scientific, and can be argued for greatly. I personally favor it but I whenever I come up with a new decision, I always attack it first, to see how people who defend it, before defending it myself.
xXCryptoXx
Posts: 5,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
9/12/2014 12:45:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 9/10/2014 9:28:10 PM, UchihaMadara wrote:
At 9/10/2014 1:29:35 PM, Wylted wrote:
At 9/9/2014 5:55:09 AM, Ajabi wrote:
So anyone want it? Shared Burden of Proof: I am Con.
http://www.debate.org...

What is it?

it doesn't matter. you can win the debate by running a kritik regarding how houses are incapable of 'believing' things, since they are inanimate objects.

I lold
Nolite Timere