Total Posts:19|Showing Posts:1-19
Jump to topic:

Ganging together to vote against somebody

vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.
imabench
Posts: 21,219
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:29:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

(it was said just to freak him out, and clearly i succeeded)
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:43:49 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

1. "when his debates do enter the voting period, have people gang up and vote against him for any reason they can find and see if that does the trick."

He not only demands it to be done but requests observation of the result of it.

2. "its better to ignore him and just votebomb his debates to get him to stop."

Why would he suggest this to someone who wants me to stop?
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:44:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

Cause he hates you.
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:44:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:44:11 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

Cause he hates you.

That entitles him to incite rule breakage?
EndarkenedRationalist
Posts: 14,201
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:45:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:44:36 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:44:11 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

Cause he hates you.

That entitles him to incite rule breakage?

You have no idea who he is, do you?
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:45:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:45:14 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:44:36 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:44:11 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

Cause he hates you.

That entitles him to incite rule breakage?

You have no idea who he is, do you?

What is that supposed to mean?
thehumanistpreacher
Posts: 252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.
imabench
Posts: 21,219
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:48:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:45:14 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:44:36 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:44:11 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

Cause he hates you.

That entitles him to incite rule breakage?

You have no idea who he is, do you?

He has no idea whatsoever, don't tell him ;D
Kevin24018 : "He's just so mean it makes me want to ball up my fists and stamp on the ground"
Geogeer: "Nobody is dumb enough to become my protege."

7/14/16 = The Presidency Dies

DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.
thehumanistpreacher
Posts: 252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:51:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.

An indication of voting for one's friend just because he is you friend and conspiring to vote for one's friend are both prejudiced in there intention during voting so they aren't both mutually exclusive.
thehumanistpreacher
Posts: 252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:53:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.

If you have faith in your allegation and are serious to see something done then speak to one of the moderators or TUF.
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:54:15 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:53:26 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.

If you have faith in your allegation and are serious to see something done then speak to one of the moderators or TUF.

TUF is not the president, this is an error on the elected officials page and is outdated I assume.
thehumanistpreacher
Posts: 252
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:56:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:54:15 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:53:26 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.

If you have faith in your allegation and are serious to see something done then speak to one of the moderators or TUF.

TUF is not the president, this is an error on the elected officials page and is outdated I assume.

Hmm...I see your dilemma I wish I could advise you further but I am unable to do so.
vwv
Posts: 666
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
10/13/2014 4:57:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 10/13/2014 4:56:11 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:54:15 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:53:26 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:49:21 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:48:42 PM, thehumanistpreacher wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:38:51 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:26:41 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:25:29 PM, vwv wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:23:54 PM, EndarkenedRationalist wrote:
At 10/13/2014 4:19:53 PM, vwv wrote:
What are your views on this? Should planning such a thing be permitted on a site that claims to be designed for intellectual dispute with unbias judgements?

It's against site policy to specifically ask someone to vote for/against someone else.

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...

Both of those are hypotheticals. He hasn't specifically asked anyone to vote against you on a specific debate.

Alright so then what did he say that for?

It can be said that some can have a guilty tendency to vote in line of friendships then points made in the debate.

That isn't what the links indicate. They indicate overt conspiring.

If you have faith in your allegation and are serious to see something done then speak to one of the moderators or TUF.

TUF is not the president, this is an error on the elected officials page and is outdated I assume.

Hmm...I see your dilemma I wish I could advise you further but I am unable to do so.

I know the current president and have sorted things out. Thanks, though.