Total Posts:11|Showing Posts:1-11
Jump to topic:

DDO's Great(er) Cultural Divide

Envisage
Posts: 3,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.
Ajabi
Posts: 1,504
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 8:27:57 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

And its still less absurd that YYW.
CJKAllstar
Posts: 408
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 8:33:11 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
"Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." - George Orwell
DarthVitiosus
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.
WILL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL:
#1. I have met 10 people worth discussing with on DDO who are not interested in ideological or romantic visions of the world we all live in.
#2. 10 people admit they have no interest in any one else's opinion other than their own.
#3. 10 people admit they are products of their environment and their ideas derive from said environment rather than doing any serious critical thinking and search for answers themselves.
thett3
Posts: 14,378
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:36:44 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM, DarthVitiosus wrote:
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.

No one cares about your opinion, Sith Lord. Your kind oughta have been stamped out a long long time ago
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Posts: 12,398
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:39:18 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 10:36:44 AM, thett3 wrote:
At 2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM, DarthVitiosus wrote:
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.

No one cares about your opinion, Sith Lord. Your kind oughta have been stamped out a long long time ago

And by "your kind," he means a non-real-'Merican--a.k.a, a non-gun-toting, baby-squirrel-shooting, cross-burning, church-going, GOP-voting, tax-evading, oil-loving, climate-change-denying, graze-fee-evading, government-bashing Texan.

I probably missed a few things....Bah humbug.
~ResponsiblyIrresponsible

DDO's Economics Messiah
thett3
Posts: 14,378
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:41:47 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 10:39:18 AM, ResponsiblyIrresponsible wrote:
At 2/22/2015 10:36:44 AM, thett3 wrote:
At 2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM, DarthVitiosus wrote:
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.

No one cares about your opinion, Sith Lord. Your kind oughta have been stamped out a long long time ago

And by "your kind," he means a non-real-'Merican--a.k.a, a non-gun-toting, baby-squirrel-shooting, cross-burning, church-going, GOP-voting, tax-evading, oil-loving, climate-change-denying, graze-fee-evading, government-bashing Texan.

I probably missed a few things....Bah humbug.

No, I mean a sith lord lol. Get it..."long long time ago, in a galaxy far away"

Although I agree on the things you said, too
DDO Vice President

#StandwithBossy

#UnbanTheMadman

#BetOnThett

"Don't quote me, ever." -Max

"My name is max. I'm not a big fan of slacks"- Max rapping

"Walmart should have the opportunity to bribe a politician to it's agenda" -Max

"Thett, you're really good at convincing people you're a decent person"-tulle

"You fit the character of Regina George quite nicely"- Sam

: At 11/12/2016 11:49:40 PM, Raisor wrote:
: thett was right
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Posts: 12,398
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:42:30 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 10:41:47 AM, thett3 wrote:
At 2/22/2015 10:39:18 AM, ResponsiblyIrresponsible wrote:
At 2/22/2015 10:36:44 AM, thett3 wrote:
At 2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM, DarthVitiosus wrote:
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.

No one cares about your opinion, Sith Lord. Your kind oughta have been stamped out a long long time ago

And by "your kind," he means a non-real-'Merican--a.k.a, a non-gun-toting, baby-squirrel-shooting, cross-burning, church-going, GOP-voting, tax-evading, oil-loving, climate-change-denying, graze-fee-evading, government-bashing Texan.

I probably missed a few things....Bah humbug.

No, I mean a sith lord lol. Get it..."long long time ago, in a galaxy far away"

Although I agree on the things you said, too

Lol, dude, I never got into Star Wars, so the reference wasn't second nature to me :P
~ResponsiblyIrresponsible

DDO's Economics Messiah
DarthVitiosus
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:43:31 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 10:36:44 AM, thett3 wrote:
At 2/22/2015 9:23:37 AM, DarthVitiosus wrote:
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

This is deliberately why I avoid discussing with some people in the forums. The only opinion that matters is theirs. When just showing a simple amount of skepticism, they engage in personal attacks. They have no intention of any real discussion.

No one cares about your opinion, Sith Lord. Your kind oughta have been stamped out a long long time ago

This is not the Sith Lord you are looking for.
WILL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL:
#1. I have met 10 people worth discussing with on DDO who are not interested in ideological or romantic visions of the world we all live in.
#2. 10 people admit they have no interest in any one else's opinion other than their own.
#3. 10 people admit they are products of their environment and their ideas derive from said environment rather than doing any serious critical thinking and search for answers themselves.
SebUK
Posts: 850
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 3:32:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

Which am I, Sir Envisage?
I WILL DECIDE WHAT THIS DEBATE IS ABOUT. I AM SPIRITUAL, NOT RELIGIOYUS. YOU DONT HAVE TO BE RELIGIOUS TO BELIEVE IN GOD, AND YOU DO WORSHIP MONEY IF YOU CARE MORE ABOUT YOUR WALLET THAAN YOU DO THE POOR. YOU ARE A TROLL THAT IS OUT FOR ATTENTUION."- SitaraMusica
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 3:38:14 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 7:52:41 AM, Envisage wrote:
There are socially challenged self-righteous, overly-sensitive-to-sex&attacks-on-homosexuality, condescending, vote-harassing, directed vote abstaining, passive aggressive, arrogant @ss individual(s) who often do not practice what they preach.... and then there is everyone else.

And I am right because I say I am, I don't need to justify this further, just because.

Some people have thick skin, others don't.