Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

Relativism False

Tylered
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 8:33:45 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Relativism seems very desirable at first glance. For it feeds into our selfish desire to live without responsibility and scream for accountability. Its a scheme to justify our every action, but relativist are fast to want justice when an unjust act has been done to them. It sits on a crumbling foundation, it want no judgement while judging others that don't go along with their ideology.
Envisage
Posts: 3,646
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 8:46:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 8:33:45 PM, Tylered wrote:
Relativism seems very desirable at first glance. For it feeds into our selfish desire to live without responsibility and scream for accountability. Its a scheme to justify our every action, but relativist are fast to want justice when an unjust act has been done to them. It sits on a crumbling foundation, it want no judgement while judging others that don't go along with their ideology.

Philosophy Forum This Say
---------------->

Society Forum That Way
<----------------
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 9:43:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 9:28:22 PM, Tylered wrote:
Meaning? I'm new brother.

http://www.debate.org...
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Unitomic
Posts: 591
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:05:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 8:33:45 PM, Tylered wrote:
Relativism seems very desirable at first glance. For it feeds into our selfish desire to live without responsibility and scream for accountability. Its a scheme to justify our every action, but relativist are fast to want justice when an unjust act has been done to them. It sits on a crumbling foundation, it want no judgement while judging others that don't go along with their ideology.

http://www.debate.org...
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 10:40:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 10:12:43 PM, Tylered wrote:
Humanism is your answer?

What?
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Tylered
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 11:37:51 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM, Tylered wrote:
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?

I'm confused... No one made any quote. Me and the first guy are telling you that this whole thread belongs in the Philosophy Forum. Also, click Reply And Quote next time.
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Tylered
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/23/2015 12:00:13 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 11:37:51 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM, Tylered wrote:
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?

I'm confused... No one made any quote. Me and the first guy are telling you that this whole thread belongs in the Philosophy Forum. Also, click Reply And Quote next time.

I'm new I did not mean for it to be here. I was commenting on unitoms quote. Duely noted. Thanks for advice about where to make topic. One question, why all the debate link stuff? I don't understand?
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/23/2015 12:01:06 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/23/2015 12:00:13 AM, Tylered wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:37:51 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM, Tylered wrote:
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?

I'm confused... No one made any quote. Me and the first guy are telling you that this whole thread belongs in the Philosophy Forum. Also, click Reply And Quote next time.

I'm new I did not mean for it to be here. I was commenting on unitoms quote. Duely noted. Thanks for advice about where to make topic. One question, why all the debate link stuff? I don't understand?

Sometimes it's easier to send a debate than to explain your side if you aren't that interested in the topic.
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --
Tylered
Posts: 24
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/23/2015 12:11:44 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/23/2015 12:01:06 AM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/23/2015 12:00:13 AM, Tylered wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:37:51 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM, Tylered wrote:
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?

I'm confused... No one made any quote. Me and the first guy are telling you that this whole thread belongs in the Philosophy Forum. Also, click Reply And Quote next time.

I'm new I did not mean for it to be here. I was commenting on unitoms quote. Duely noted. Thanks for advice about where to make topic. One question, why all the debate link stuff? I don't understand?

Sometimes it's easier to send a debate than to explain your side if you aren't that interested in the topic.

OK I guess, why enter and reply anything if you aren't interested? I don't see the purpose, but I do understand what you mean. Thanks Holm skillet. I appreciate you helping me out.
donald.keller
Posts: 3,709
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/23/2015 12:18:46 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/23/2015 12:11:44 AM, Tylered wrote:
At 2/23/2015 12:01:06 AM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/23/2015 12:00:13 AM, Tylered wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:37:51 PM, donald.keller wrote:
At 2/22/2015 11:01:49 PM, Tylered wrote:
Your quote. Classic humanisim- man is the measure of all things. In particular, man takes the place of God as the anchor of moral values, and moral duties are determined by what promotes human flourishing.

Why think that human beings would be morally significant if that were true?

I'm confused... No one made any quote. Me and the first guy are telling you that this whole thread belongs in the Philosophy Forum. Also, click Reply And Quote next time.

I'm new I did not mean for it to be here. I was commenting on unitoms quote. Duely noted. Thanks for advice about where to make topic. One question, why all the debate link stuff? I don't understand?

Sometimes it's easier to send a debate than to explain your side if you aren't that interested in the topic.

OK I guess, why enter and reply anything if you aren't interested? I don't see the purpose, but I do understand what you mean. Thanks Holm skillet. I appreciate you helping me out.

Because there are many levels of interest. Plenty of levels were you are interested enough to check it out, but not to get strongly involved.
-- Don't forget to submit your unvoted debates to the Voter's Union --

OFFICIAL DK/TUF 2016 Platform: http://www.debate.org...

My Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com...
#SaveThePresidency
#SaveTheSite

-- DK/TUF 2016 --