Total Posts:17|Showing Posts:1-17
Jump to topic:

Anti-Noob-Sniping Idea

bsh1
Posts: 28,792
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:30:55 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I proposed a system whereby anyone with 3,500+ ELO could not accept a debate instigated by a member with a month or less of membership. It originally met with opposition, so I scrapped it, but now some people have seemed to voice a desire for something similar.

What are your thoughts?
Live Long and Prosper

I'm a Bish.


"Twilight isn't just about obtuse metaphors between cannibalism and premarital sex, it also teaches us the futility of hope." - Raisor

"[Bsh1] is the Guinan of DDO." - ButterCatX

Open Debate Topics Project: http://www.debate.org...

Mafia Sign-ups: http://www.debate.org...
FourTrouble
Posts: 15,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:33:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I support the overall proposal. I think a month might be too long, since some members prove themselves easily within two weeks, and I'd want to be able to debate those members if they have interesting topics.
If you'd like a vote on your debate, please send me a link. I'll do my best to offer a sufficient RFD in your favor.

Also: If you'd like to vote bomb a debate and need help crafting a sufficient RFD, let me know.
YYW
Posts: 42,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:36:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:33:48 PM, FourTrouble wrote:
I support the overall proposal.
Trump's Criminal Campaign and Presidency:

http://www.debate.org...

Where we were, on Trump:

http://www.debate.org...

Russia: The Update

http://www.debate.org...
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,215
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:39:34 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:33:48 PM, FourTrouble wrote:
I support the overall proposal. I think a month might be too long, since some members prove themselves easily within two weeks, and I'd want to be able to debate those members if they have interesting topics.

True, but doesn't this system allow the noob to accept a debate you instigate?
Just tell them you will debate them, and challenge them.
My work here is, finally, done.
FourTrouble
Posts: 15,932
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:40:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:39:34 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:
At 5/4/2015 8:33:48 PM, FourTrouble wrote:
I support the overall proposal. I think a month might be too long, since some members prove themselves easily within two weeks, and I'd want to be able to debate those members if they have interesting topics.

True, but doesn't this system allow the noob to accept a debate you instigate?
Just tell them you will debate them, and challenge them.

That's true. Good point.
If you'd like a vote on your debate, please send me a link. I'll do my best to offer a sufficient RFD in your favor.

Also: If you'd like to vote bomb a debate and need help crafting a sufficient RFD, let me know.
Wylted
Posts: 23,982
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 8:56:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
If anything make them Non ELO debates, but new people should definitely get the opportunity to debate experienced opponents.
Fat owned account
Maikuru
Posts: 9,112
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:17:12 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:56:46 PM, Wylted wrote:
If anything make them Non ELO debates, but new people should definitely get the opportunity to debate experienced opponents.

I definitely like the idea of non-ELO debates.
"You assume I wouldn't want to burn this whole place to the ground."
- lamerde

https://i.imgflip.com...
Death23
Posts: 1,016
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:30:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:30:55 PM, bsh1 wrote:
I proposed a system whereby anyone with 3,500+ ELO could not accept a debate instigated by a member with a month or less of membership. It originally met with opposition, so I scrapped it, but now some people have seemed to voice a desire for something similar.

What are your thoughts?

I would support this if all of the prior ELO gains from noob-sniping were retroactively reversed. It wouldn't be fair to have the prior ELO gains from noob-sniping permanently grandfathered in.
bsh1
Posts: 28,792
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:31:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 9:30:28 PM, Death23 wrote:
At 5/4/2015 8:30:55 PM, bsh1 wrote:
I proposed a system whereby anyone with 3,500+ ELO could not accept a debate instigated by a member with a month or less of membership. It originally met with opposition, so I scrapped it, but now some people have seemed to voice a desire for something similar.

What are your thoughts?

I would support this if all of the prior ELO gains from noob-sniping were retroactively reversed. It wouldn't be fair to have the prior ELO gains from noob-sniping permanently grandfathered in.

I would like that too.
Live Long and Prosper

I'm a Bish.


"Twilight isn't just about obtuse metaphors between cannibalism and premarital sex, it also teaches us the futility of hope." - Raisor

"[Bsh1] is the Guinan of DDO." - ButterCatX

Open Debate Topics Project: http://www.debate.org...

Mafia Sign-ups: http://www.debate.org...
bsh1
Posts: 28,792
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:32:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:56:46 PM, Wylted wrote:
If anything make them Non ELO debates, but new people should definitely get the opportunity to debate experienced opponents.

Noobs and experienced members could still debate, but only if the experienced member instigated. That way the noob wasn't "sniped."
Live Long and Prosper

I'm a Bish.


"Twilight isn't just about obtuse metaphors between cannibalism and premarital sex, it also teaches us the futility of hope." - Raisor

"[Bsh1] is the Guinan of DDO." - ButterCatX

Open Debate Topics Project: http://www.debate.org...

Mafia Sign-ups: http://www.debate.org...
Maikuru
Posts: 9,112
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:36:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The idea is a good one, though the more I think about it, the more unnecessary it seems. If a new member is thoughtful, they will look into other debates before making their own. They could also accept pending debates against seemingly equally-skilled debaters before instigating. If they don't want to take these steps, then they obviously open themselves up to facing skilled opponents.
"You assume I wouldn't want to burn this whole place to the ground."
- lamerde

https://i.imgflip.com...
tejretics
Posts: 6,751
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 9:44:49 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:30:55 PM, bsh1 wrote:
I proposed a system whereby anyone with 3,500+ ELO could not accept a debate instigated by a member with a month or less of membership. It originally met with opposition, so I scrapped it, but now some people have seemed to voice a desire for something similar.

What are your thoughts?

Not a MONTH or less, because, for example, when I was a month old on DDO, I wanted higher-Elo members to be better at debating. Maybe 2 weeks.
"Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe." - Frederick Douglass

http://gotejas.com...
ShabShoral
Posts: 4,004
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 10:12:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
There's no reason to stop noobs from doing whatever they choose. They can already filter their opponents so as to exclude high-Elo debaters. If they don't use this mechanism, that's on them. What's not acceptable, however, is to force them into not having good debaters accept their challenges. There's no point in that level of nanny-state micromanaging.
I would prefer not to.
RainbowDash52
Posts: 304
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 10:59:23 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The best way to prevent noob sniping would be to have people start off with a provisional ELO for there first 5 or so debates. When a person with a provisional ELO debates someone with a non-provisional ELO, the non-provisional ELO will not be affected. This way everyone can debate whoever they want, but you can't noob snipe to boost ELO.
ShabShoral
Posts: 4,004
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2015 11:16:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 10:59:23 PM, RainbowDash52 wrote:
The best way to prevent noob sniping would be to have people start off with a provisional ELO for there first 5 or so debates. When a person with a provisional ELO debates someone with a non-provisional ELO, the non-provisional ELO will not be affected. This way everyone can debate whoever they want, but you can't noob snipe to boost ELO.

This is the right answer. Have new members start as "unranked", and, until they complete some debates, have their Elo change without changing the Elos of their opponents.
I would prefer not to.
FaustianJustice
Posts: 7,638
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2015 12:02:09 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Do you consider it noob sniping if the opponent FFs? I feel bad about any gains in ELO I get from accepting a debate in which I win, and the opponent FFed the majority or all of the remaining rounds. There was nothing there.
Here we have an advocate for Islamic arranged marriages demonstrating that children can consent to sex.
http://www.debate.org...
Diqiucun_Cunmin
Posts: 2,740
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2015 1:55:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 5/4/2015 8:30:55 PM, bsh1 wrote:
I proposed a system whereby anyone with 3,500+ ELO could not accept a debate instigated by a member with a month or less of membership. It originally met with opposition, so I scrapped it, but now some people have seemed to voice a desire for something similar.

What are your thoughts?

Can we just tell them 'you can set an upper limit on the number of debates your opponent has completed'? Then they'll get to set a reasonable limit, say, 30, which allows themselves to choose not to be noob-sniped. (I'm doing that myself, though I'm choosing opponents by asking them to apply in comments, rather than with a hard limit). If they choose to be noob-sniped, on the other hand, they can also do it.
I think it is well established that the only reason aliens come to earth is to slice up cows and examine inside peoples' bottoms. Unless you are a cow or suffer haemerrhoids I don't think there is anything to worry about from aliens. - keithprosser

Don't be a stat cynic:
http://www.debate.org...

Response to conservative views on deforestation:
http://www.debate.org...

Topics I'd like to debate (not debating ATM): http://tinyurl.com...