Total Posts:9|Showing Posts:1-9
Jump to topic:

Three way debate

philochristos
Posts: 2,614
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?
"Not to know of what things one should demand demonstration, and of what one should not, argues want of education." ~Aristotle

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." ~Aristotle
TUF
Posts: 21,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 1:03:22 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Objective Morality VS Subjectivity VS Nihilism. Would be interesting.
"I've got to go and grab a shirt" ~ Airmax1227
Varrack
Posts: 2,410
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.
philochristos
Posts: 2,614
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 1:27:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.

That gives me an idea. Maybe I could start a new DDO show that is similar to the old Philochristos Show except that instead of interviewing one person, I could moderate a panel discussion with multiple people.
"Not to know of what things one should demand demonstration, and of what one should not, argues want of education." ~Aristotle

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." ~Aristotle
zmikecuber
Posts: 4,071
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 7:28:52 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.

but then you can't have people vote on it on here
"Delete your fvcking sig" -1hard

"primal man had the habit, when he came into contact with fire, of satisfying the infantile desire connected with it, by putting it out with a stream of his urine... Putting out the fire by micturating was therefore a kind of sexual act with a male, an enjoyment of sexual potency in a homosexual competition."
Varrack
Posts: 2,410
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 7:29:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 7:28:52 PM, zmikecuber wrote:
At 6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.

but then you can't have people vote on it on here

Make a poll and have people vote on it that way.
zmikecuber
Posts: 4,071
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 7:39:00 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 7:29:50 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 7:28:52 PM, zmikecuber wrote:
At 6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.

but then you can't have people vote on it on here

Make a poll and have people vote on it that way.

Eww.
"Delete your fvcking sig" -1hard

"primal man had the habit, when he came into contact with fire, of satisfying the infantile desire connected with it, by putting it out with a stream of his urine... Putting out the fire by micturating was therefore a kind of sexual act with a male, an enjoyment of sexual potency in a homosexual competition."
Daktoria
Posts: 497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2015 10:59:31 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 1:03:22 PM, TUF wrote:
Objective Morality VS Subjectivity VS Nihilism. Would be interesting.

Could make it have four sides instead of three: absolutism, relativism, universalism, nihilism.
TheHitchslap
Posts: 1,231
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/18/2015 12:07:05 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 6/17/2015 1:08:54 PM, Varrack wrote:
At 6/17/2015 12:47:00 PM, philochristos wrote:
What would y'all think about the idea of a three-way debate? Of course it would require re-writing the code to allow for such a thing. But it would enable people to debate issues for which there are three different positions. That could be fun. What do y'all think?

You don't need to rewrite code, you can just do a G+ hangout. But that would still be cool.

+1
Thank you for voting!