Total Posts:24|Showing Posts:1-24
Jump to topic:

Whats up with the DDO FCC lawsuit.

TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?
YYW
Posts: 42,315
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.
Trump's Criminal Campaign and Presidency:

http://www.debate.org...

Where we were, on Trump:

http://www.debate.org...

Russia: The Update

http://www.debate.org...
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/23/2016 4:50:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.

Don't know about that YYW. He was very convincing.
YYW
Posts: 42,315
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/23/2016 4:53:36 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/23/2016 4:50:58 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.

Don't know about that YYW. He was very convincing.

The guy was a total lunatic.
Trump's Criminal Campaign and Presidency:

http://www.debate.org...

Where we were, on Trump:

http://www.debate.org...

Russia: The Update

http://www.debate.org...
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/23/2016 5:03:55 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/23/2016 4:53:36 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:50:58 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.

Don't know about that YYW. He was very convincing.

The guy was a total lunatic.

Yea he was. Like well before that he was, but it got disturbing how deluded he was. I really think he believed his own insanity.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.
triangle.128k
Posts: 4,541
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 4:55:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/23/2016 5:03:55 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:53:36 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:50:58 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.

Don't know about that YYW. He was very convincing.

The guy was a total lunatic.

Yea he was. Like well before that he was, but it got disturbing how deluded he was. I really think he believed his own insanity.

I doubt that, he probably was just trolling.
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 5:09:22 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 4:55:27 PM, triangle.128k wrote:
At 1/23/2016 5:03:55 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:53:36 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:50:58 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:43:29 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/23/2016 4:13:37 PM, TBR wrote:
Back a month or so ago that Toad guy told us to keep an eye open for the fall of DDO to litigation. Anyone know where this is at? Are they quaking in their boots yet?

He was blowing smoke out of his @ss. The guy was totally ignorant, could not even understand what he was saying, and the FCC would laugh at him if he complained to them.

Don't know about that YYW. He was very convincing.

The guy was a total lunatic.

Yea he was. Like well before that he was, but it got disturbing how deluded he was. I really think he believed his own insanity.

I doubt that, he probably was just trolling.

You would think. After reading the thread for a bit, you might be convinced of his sincerity. I think he believed it.
Forever23
Posts: 1,759
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:08:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

lol wtf
Troll Queen Of DDO

#BetOnThett
#UnbanTheMadman
#StandWithBossy

Bet On How Long DDO Will Last Here:
http://www.debate.org...

I hate you <3
airmax1227
Posts: 13,707
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.
Debate.org Moderator
TBR
Posts: 9,991
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:22:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

Tyrant!
YYW
Posts: 42,315
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.
Trump's Criminal Campaign and Presidency:

http://www.debate.org...

Where we were, on Trump:

http://www.debate.org...

Russia: The Update

http://www.debate.org...
The-Voice-of-Truth
Posts: 9,467
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:25:07 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

This dude must have been thoroughly stupid.
"...feminazis, my favorite number..." ~PeterSmith

"Add that to the Bible, I guess." ~Max

"Isn't everything on this site my arbitrary whim?" ~Max

"If anyone wants to engage in casual anti-Semitism, then whatever." ~Max

Vaarka swung his sword at the mod. However, since I am now incorporeal, he ends up accidentally striking the entire American landmass (It's a REALLY bastard sword), destroying both continents. Spiders are now at 50% of capacity."
daytonanerd
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:30:25 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Wait... He wasn't just trolling?
Cringe
airmax1227
Posts: 13,707
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:31:03 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Indeed. The entire thing was absurd, and if he hadn't gone to such lengths to make his points and arguments, I would have just assumed he had to be trolling. But after reading through his position, I think it was pretty clear that he actually believed what he was saying.

But I just wanted to clarify the above that he wasn't threatening to sue me because "I was mean to him". To the contrary, even in the light of the fact that his position is even well beyond the way you have described it above, I didn't say that to him, nor was I rude to him in any way. I just deleted his thread (something easily justified) and he threatened to sue me.
Debate.org Moderator
airmax1227
Posts: 13,707
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:32:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:30:25 PM, daytonanerd wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Wait... He wasn't just trolling?

I don't believe so. I think he was a rather eccentric individual with no understanding of how the law would treat this position - which would likely be to laugh at it until medical attention was necessary.
Debate.org Moderator
imabench
Posts: 21,821
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:35:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:25:07 PM, The-Voice-of-Truth wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

This dude must have been thoroughly stupid.

I was in law school for all of 2 months and even I thoroughly dismantled the 'case' he said he had against DDO.....
DDO: THE MOVIE = http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

VP of DDO from Dec 14th 2014 to Jan 1st 2015
The-Voice-of-Truth
Posts: 9,467
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:36:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:35:35 PM, imabench wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:25:07 PM, The-Voice-of-Truth wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

This dude must have been thoroughly stupid.

I was in law school for all of 2 months and even I thoroughly dismantled the 'case' he said he had against DDO.....

If you read the ToS, you can thoroughly dismantle his "case."
"...feminazis, my favorite number..." ~PeterSmith

"Add that to the Bible, I guess." ~Max

"Isn't everything on this site my arbitrary whim?" ~Max

"If anyone wants to engage in casual anti-Semitism, then whatever." ~Max

Vaarka swung his sword at the mod. However, since I am now incorporeal, he ends up accidentally striking the entire American landmass (It's a REALLY bastard sword), destroying both continents. Spiders are now at 50% of capacity."
sadolite
Posts: 9,323
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:39:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Pfff
daytonanerd
Posts: 6,774
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:40:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:32:43 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:30:25 PM, daytonanerd wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Wait... He wasn't just trolling?

I don't believe so. I think he was a rather eccentric individual with no understanding of how the law would treat this position - which would likely be to laugh at it until medical attention was necessary.

...

Sanders for President?
Cringe
airmax1227
Posts: 13,707
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:41:27 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:40:32 PM, daytonanerd wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:32:43 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:30:25 PM, daytonanerd wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Wait... He wasn't just trolling?

I don't believe so. I think he was a rather eccentric individual with no understanding of how the law would treat this position - which would likely be to laugh at it until medical attention was necessary.

...

Sanders for President?

Works for me
Debate.org Moderator
YYW
Posts: 42,315
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 7:44:01 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:31:03 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:23:04 PM, YYW wrote:
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

As a matter of law, his argument was laughably stupid.

Indeed. The entire thing was absurd, and if he hadn't gone to such lengths to make his points and arguments, I would have just assumed he had to be trolling. But after reading through his position, I think it was pretty clear that he actually believed what he was saying.

But I just wanted to clarify the above that he wasn't threatening to sue me because "I was mean to him". To the contrary, even in the light of the fact that his position is even well beyond the way you have described it above, I didn't say that to him, nor was I rude to him in any way. I just deleted his thread (something easily justified) and he threatened to sue me.

Of course. Your reputation of being a gracious and benevolent dictator remains unmarred by the unsavory and vain legal ambitions of a member who is clearly very confused and troubled.
Trump's Criminal Campaign and Presidency:

http://www.debate.org...

Where we were, on Trump:

http://www.debate.org...

Russia: The Update

http://www.debate.org...
YamaVonKarma
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/24/2016 11:49:38 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/24/2016 7:19:50 PM, airmax1227 wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:29:29 PM, TBR wrote:
At 1/24/2016 4:21:10 PM, sadolite wrote:
What was the supposed FCC violation?

Airmax being mean to him. It was going to be Frogguy vs. DDO, Airmax etc.

Just to clarify for the sake of historical accuracy, I wasn't mean to him. Considering that he was threatening to sue me, the site, all the other mods, and generally insulting me, I believe I was rather polite to him and I humored his grievance to the extent that I believe was appropriate.

He threatened me (and the site, etc) with a lawsuit due to my removal of one of his threads, that I had determined was spam, and in the wrong sub forum either way. He believed he could claim copyright ownership of that thread and therefore I violated his property rights, or something along those lines. His argument was clearly incorrect, and even if he went to the trouble of filing a law suite against me and DDO, it wouldn't get any further than that.

I have seen people arrested for and try to build lawsuits for some pretty "out there" reasons. However, this is one of the more interesting threats of a lawsuit I have yet to see.
People who I've called as mafia DP1:
TUF, and YYW