Total Posts:58|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

JimProfit

lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 6:33:10 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Okay everyone, I believe its time that we all report JimProfit, and even send Phil a PM saying
"The user JimProfit seems to be causing problems on this site. He only posts hate content centered towards women, homosexuals, and moderators. He hasn't added anything of use to this site, and seems to just be a troll."
Of course if you wanna add something to that message feel free but we should all say about the same thing, so he will be more likely to take it seriously.
=====================================================

I originally had this posted in the spam thread, but I have decided we want people to see this.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 7:52:00 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
It really is the case that if you do not feed trolls they die. It can be really difficult sometimes when they get under your skin, but the best of all put downs is to simply ignore them. There are about four or five trolls that no longer/rarely post, simply because I don't acknowledge them.

Ignoring the troll really does work.

This thread invites him to post, other people will be invited to post in reaction, it gives him full licence to troll and for any other troll to wade in and stir up sh!t. Put the trolls in their place and then snub them, it really is that simple. You have made your case, report him if you want to, but otherwise just pretend he does not exist.
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 8:02:28 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 6:33:10 AM, lovelife wrote:
I have decided we want people to see this.

That's what they want. You can't give them what they want. That means they win.

http://simplemom.net...
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 8:05:08 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 8:02:28 AM, Korashk wrote:
At 11/16/2010 6:33:10 AM, lovelife wrote:
I have decided we want people to see this.

That's what they want. You can't give them what they want. That means they win.

http://simplemom.net...

Well I put it in the spam thread because most people that would report him visit there [semi] often, but then dark was whining about how no one really goes there and I should make a case against him.
Ignoring is one way to kill trolls, or we could get him the fvck out.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
xxdarkxx
Posts: 3,090
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 9:05:27 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 8:05:08 AM, lovelife wrote:
At 11/16/2010 8:02:28 AM, Korashk wrote:
At 11/16/2010 6:33:10 AM, lovelife wrote:
I have decided we want people to see this.

That's what they want. You can't give them what they want. That means they win.

http://simplemom.net...

Well I put it in the spam thread because most people that would report him visit there [semi] often, but then dark was whining about how no one really goes there and I should make a case against him.
Ignoring is one way to kill trolls, or we could get him the fvck out.

lol check that post again. I wasn't whining I was simply making a point. I wouldn't whine about people not seeing your idea when I generally do not care about it.
annhasle
Posts: 6,657
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 9:38:25 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Yes, his posts are controversial and usually unsubstantiated blather, but really - you cannot ban someone for having an opposing opinion. Regardless of his posts being adversarial to yours and even mine, I see no reason to report him. Has he attacked any user specifically? No. Made threats? No. Just ignore him and let him slowly fade to the background.
I'm not back. This idiot just upset me which made me stop lurking.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 9:41:14 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 9:38:25 AM, annhasle wrote:
Yes, his posts are controversial and usually unsubstantiated blather, but really - you cannot ban someone for having an opposing opinion. Regardless of his posts being adversarial to yours and even mine, I see no reason to report him. Has he attacked any user specifically? No. Made threats? No. Just ignore him and let him slowly fade to the background.

Hate content is reportable, so are insults.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 10:32:31 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.

Who do you think he is a reincarnation of?
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 10:33:06 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.

Well if he's an old @sshole, then banning him a few more times, and then threatening a lawsuit should get him to leave.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 10:48:25 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.

He's not. He's a new person. I have facebook to confirm this.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 10:52:07 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 10:32:31 AM, OreEle wrote:
At 11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.

Who do you think he is a reincarnation of?

Muhammad or someone like that
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 2:06:53 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 10:30:14 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
pffft, rookie. This wont' defeat JP, he's a reincarnation of someone most likely. Learn from the masters.

JP is one of FREEDO's facebook cronies.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
tvellalott
Posts: 10,864
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 3:10:26 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
This website is going to turn into a big circle jerk of wankers if we keep this up. Calling any new member who antagonises people a troll. Trying to get them banned.
Jim is interesting. I like him simply because he stirs the pot.
"Caitlyn Jenner is an incredibly brave and stunningly beautiful woman."

Muh threads
Using mafia tactics in real-life: http://www.debate.org...
6 years of DDO: http://www.debate.org...
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 3:16:50 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 3:10:26 PM, tvellalott wrote:
This website is going to turn into a big circle jerk of wankers if we keep this up. Calling any new member who antagonises people a troll. Trying to get them banned.
Jim is interesting. I like him simply because he stirs the pot.

"Only a gun to the head will do. Maybe a gun to your family's head." - Jim Profit.

He doesn't stir the pot, because he doesn't even attempt to get people to think of new ideas or in new ways. He doesn't attempt to get you to look at something from a new angle to help you learn. If he did, I would support him fully.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 3:22:51 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 3:10:26 PM, tvellalott wrote:
This website is going to turn into a big circle jerk of wankers if we keep this up. Calling any new member who antagonises people a troll. Trying to get them banned.
Jim is interesting. I like him simply because he stirs the pot.

I don't care that he antagonizes people; he's dumb as a rock so I just ignore him. However there's a difference between antagonizing and straight up insulting. I don't care if he insults people either, but if I have been banned for cursing and/or insulting people in the past, then why should he not be? It's not fair to expect the rules to only apply to those who piss you off, and let the rest slide. If he continues to be so abrasive, nasty, mean-spiritedly ignorant and violates the TOS (which he's already done multiple times) then he should be punished just as everyone else is. It really annoys me when other people constantly dish the most provocative insults and don't get punished because nobody reports them... but if it's me, I'll have a dozen people ready and willing to rat me out in the blink of an eye lol. F*ck that. Report him. Why not?
President of DDO
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 3:49:05 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 3:22:51 PM, theLwerd wrote:
At 11/16/2010 3:10:26 PM, tvellalott wrote:
This website is going to turn into a big circle jerk of wankers if we keep this up. Calling any new member who antagonises people a troll. Trying to get them banned.
Jim is interesting. I like him simply because he stirs the pot.

I don't care that he antagonizes people; he's dumb as a rock so I just ignore him. However there's a difference between antagonizing and straight up insulting. I don't care if he insults people either, but if I have been banned for cursing and/or insulting people in the past, then why should he not be? It's not fair to expect the rules to only apply to those who piss you off, and let the rest slide. If he continues to be so abrasive, nasty, mean-spiritedly ignorant and violates the TOS (which he's already done multiple times) then he should be punished just as everyone else is. It really annoys me when other people constantly dish the most provocative insults and don't get punished because nobody reports them... but if it's me, I'll have a dozen people ready and willing to rat me out in the blink of an eye lol. F*ck that. Report him. Why not?
Thank you. I didn't know you got banned tho.
My only problem with him is that he's just mean, and insulting, he isn't cleaver, he doesn't give a new way of thinking, he doesn't help, he's just a troll. I accept new members, especially ones that are n00bish, but this guy already made up his mind about how he's going to act.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Public_Agenda
Posts: 10
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 4:05:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
"Honestly, most women deserve to get raped. When a man gets raped, I honestly don't care. I may sympathize a bit for them if it was by a woman, because that's very degrading, but all in all. I don't really see rape as a big deal. To me it's just like getting punched in the face.

Only... it's in your genitals... and it might even feel good... LOL! People who get raped are just drama queens, and probably don't want to admit they were leading their rapist on. All the more so when it's a woman when that's all they do. Who's to say if there even IS rapists when all women do is lie. For all we know it's just some crap they made up. Honestly, it's women's own fault. They never put out, they send false signals, screw it. Take them. They're not even people really. They're just like a couch that can b1tch at you and possibly make a baby."

A quote from JP. One of the most messed up things I've ever read. Get that jackass out of here, please....
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 4:34:09 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 4:05:44 PM, Public_Agenda wrote:
A quote from JP. One of the most messed up things I've ever read. Get that jackass out of here, please....

Report the comment/debate.
President of DDO
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 4:34:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 3:51:36 PM, OreEle wrote:
Though he's probably reading this thinking, "goood...gooooooood."

Probably. A testament to how pathetic he is... nothing better to do, eh? Psychology 101: Clear sign of desperate cries for attention. It's obvious nobody loves him and never has.
President of DDO
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/16/2010 4:38:35 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 4:34:09 PM, theLwerd wrote:
At 11/16/2010 4:05:44 PM, Public_Agenda wrote:
A quote from JP. One of the most messed up things I've ever read. Get that jackass out of here, please....

Report the comment/debate.

It was in the women/rape thread. I have already reported it, and posted my message to report him.
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
tvellalott
Posts: 10,864
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 1:59:55 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
It seems fairly ironic that Lwerd has Biggie Smalls and lovelife has Marilyn Manson as their respective avatars. I'm sure a lot of people say exactly the same things about their lyrics.
"Caitlyn Jenner is an incredibly brave and stunningly beautiful woman."

Muh threads
Using mafia tactics in real-life: http://www.debate.org...
6 years of DDO: http://www.debate.org...
Cody_Franklin
Posts: 9,484
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 2:21:29 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Section 6, Subsection C of the Terms:

Will not upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, harmful, hateful, harassing, pornographic, threatening, racially or ethnically offensive, abusive, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate.

I say we petition for a ban, sure. He's clearly violated the ToS.

On a personal note, I'd say that Jim is an impotent loner who thinks that he's a bad*ss because he's dark/twisted/has contempt for humanity/says outrageous things, but, in reality, the only thing I'm seeing is a sad, pathetic excuse for a human being who probably wasn't hugged enough as a kid and, knowing that he could never get recognized for anything positive, realized that the only way--and I mean the only way--he could become a "big deal" is by trying to come off as some sort of high-class agitator. Unfortunately, he doesn't amount to much more than a common contarian with a novel position. I guess FREEDO was scraping the bottom of the barrel on this one.

By the way, I assume that the preceding was all in violation of the Terms, as well. Feel free to report it if you found it offensive, hateful, or otherwise.
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 2:25:59 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/16/2010 3:49:05 PM, lovelife wrote:
At 11/16/2010 3:22:51 PM, theLwerd wrote:
At 11/16/2010 3:10:26 PM, tvellalott wrote:
This website is going to turn into a big circle jerk of wankers if we keep this up. Calling any new member who antagonises people a troll. Trying to get them banned.
Jim is interesting. I like him simply because he stirs the pot.

I don't care that he antagonizes people; he's dumb as a rock so I just ignore him. However there's a difference between antagonizing and straight up insulting. I don't care if he insults people either, but if I have been banned for cursing and/or insulting people in the past, then why should he not be? It's not fair to expect the rules to only apply to those who piss you off, and let the rest slide. If he continues to be so abrasive, nasty, mean-spiritedly ignorant and violates the TOS (which he's already done multiple times) then he should be punished just as everyone else is. It really annoys me when other people constantly dish the most provocative insults and don't get punished because nobody reports them... but if it's me, I'll have a dozen people ready and willing to rat me out in the blink of an eye lol. F*ck that. Report him. Why not?
Thank you. I didn't know you got banned tho.
My only problem with him is that he's just mean, and insulting, he isn't cleaver, he doesn't give a new way of thinking, he doesn't help, he's just a troll. I accept new members, especially ones that are n00bish, but this guy already made up his mind about how he's going to act.


Exactly. Insults from a stupid person carry no value, so there is no offense. Insults from someone i respect are the ones that sort of hit you a bit. If anyone would be offended by this guy it would be me, and i'm not in the slightest.

My only concern is the direction of this site. What makes it a good site is the absence of these people, and the unique quality of people that are here. There is an endless supply of these people out there, and bringing them over here will be my exit, and eventually the degradation of the entire site. I don't want this to be an exclusive club, because excluding people is bad policy. However, i want us to retain the standards that keep us here. Ignore him and report him when appropriate.
innomen
Posts: 10,052
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 2:28:16 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/17/2010 2:21:29 AM, Cody_Franklin wrote:
Section 6, Subsection C of the Terms:

Will not upload, copy, distribute, share, or otherwise use Content that is unlawful, obscene, defamatory, libelous, harmful, hateful, harassing, pornographic, threatening, racially or ethnically offensive, abusive, that would violate another person's rights, constitute or encourage a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or violate any local, state, national, or international law or regulation, or that is otherwise inappropriate.

I say we petition for a ban, sure. He's clearly violated the ToS.

On a personal note, I'd say that Jim is an impotent loner who thinks that he's a bad*ss because he's dark/twisted/has contempt for humanity/says outrageous things, but, in reality, the only thing I'm seeing is a sad, pathetic excuse for a human being who probably wasn't hugged enough as a kid and, knowing that he could never get recognized for anything positive, realized that the only way--and I mean the only way--he could become a "big deal" is by trying to come off as some sort of high-class agitator. Unfortunately, he doesn't amount to much more than a common contarian with a novel position. I guess FREEDO was scraping the bottom of the barrel on this one.

By the way, I assume that the preceding was all in violation of the Terms, as well. Feel free to report it if you found it offensive, hateful, or otherwise.

That too.
Mirza
Posts: 16,992
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 2:32:18 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
Insulting womankind is a terrible thing indeed. Also, whatever one's opinion is, it should rather be brought forth through proper discussions or a conducted manner.

In fact, if such statements evolve to threats, and threats evolve into physical actions, then we have to call for capital punishment.
lovelife
Posts: 14,629
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 5:39:48 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 11/17/2010 1:59:55 AM, tvellalott wrote:
It seems fairly ironic that Lwerd has Biggie Smalls and lovelife has Marilyn Manson as their respective avatars. I'm sure a lot of people say exactly the same things about their lyrics.

What do you mean by that?
Without Royal there is a hole inside of me, I have no choice but to leave
Bipolarmoment
Posts: 43
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 6:49:24 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
I don't think hate speech should be censored--am I eliciting a debate? I hope not. Anyhow, I find JP entertaining regardless of his intention--just imagine his statements being ironic and he's a great critic.
darkkermit
Posts: 11,204
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/17/2010 10:48:12 AM
Posted: 6 years ago
JimProfit hasn't done anything wrong. This is a debate site, so if there is a new opinion let him express it. If we disagree, then we can argue against him. He actually has participated in a debate.
Open borders debate:
http://www.debate.org...