Total Posts:64|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

What economic theories do you support?

16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
Mimshot
Posts: 275
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.
Mimshot: I support the 1956 Republican platform
DDMx: So, you're a socialist?
Mimshot: Yes
lewis20
Posts: 5,093
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 7:34:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

complete curiosity here, but have you taken any macro/micro econ courses?
"If you are a racist I will attack you with the north"- Abraham Lincoln

"Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material" - Leviticus 19 19

"War is a racket" - Smedley Butler
socialpinko
Posts: 10,458
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 8:20:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

Also known as the other side of the interventionist economics coin.
: At 9/29/2014 10:55:59 AM, imabench wrote:
: : At 9/29/2014 9:43:46 AM, kbub wrote:
: :
: : DDO should discredit support of sexual violence at any time and in every way.
:
: I disagree.
johnnyboy54
Posts: 6,362
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:18:31 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 8:20:06 PM, socialpinko wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

Also known as the other side of the interventionist economics coin.

Just curious, how is it interventionist?
I didn't order assholes with my whiskey.
jimtimmy
Posts: 3,953
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:39:56 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM, Mimshot wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.

It isn't an economic theory in the same way that Keynesian, Austrian, Classical, etc. are, but it is an economic theory.

It puts a focus on government barriers to production, like regulation and high marginal tax rates. It also focuses on a more stable monetary policy.

I don't know if I would call myself a "supply sider". But, I do believe in stable monetary policy and less barriers to production. I just think that most supply siders overestimate the negative impacts of these things.

I am an adherent of New Classical economics, which advocates many supply side policies.
President of DDO
Starcraftzzz
Posts: 487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 9:58:11 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:39:56 PM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM, Mimshot wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.


It isn't an economic theory in the same way that Keynesian, Austrian, Classical, etc. are, but it is an economic theory.

It puts a focus on government barriers to production, like regulation and high marginal tax rates. It also focuses on a more stable monetary policy.

I don't know if I would call myself a "supply sider". But, I do believe in stable monetary policy and less barriers to production. I just think that most supply siders overestimate the negative impacts of these things.

I am an adherent of New Classical economics, which advocates many supply side policies.
I would like to say that what you posted was pure stupidity but that would be a lie. That's the best complement I can muster....
mongoose
Posts: 3,500
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 10:39:52 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:58:11 PM, Starcraftzzz wrote:
At 2/26/2012 9:39:56 PM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM, Mimshot wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.


It isn't an economic theory in the same way that Keynesian, Austrian, Classical, etc. are, but it is an economic theory.

It puts a focus on government barriers to production, like regulation and high marginal tax rates. It also focuses on a more stable monetary policy.

I don't know if I would call myself a "supply sider". But, I do believe in stable monetary policy and less barriers to production. I just think that most supply siders overestimate the negative impacts of these things.

I am an adherent of New Classical economics, which advocates many supply side policies.
I would like to say that what you posted was pure stupidity but that would be a lie. That's the best complement I can muster....

Why are you so rude? Nothing that jimtimmy just posted warranted any of that. If that's really the best you can do, you should probably get off the internet and watch Barney until you can learn to be civil.
It is odd when one's capacity for compassion is measured not in what he is willing to do by his own time, effort, and property, but what he will force others to do with their own property instead.
Wallstreetatheist
Posts: 7,132
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:12:25 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM, Mimshot wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.

The term "supply-side economics" is used in two different but related ways. Some use the term to refer to the fact that production (supply) underlies consumption and living standards. In the long run, our income levels reflect our ability to produce goods and services that people value. Higher income levels and living standards cannot be achieved without expansion in output. Virtually all economists accept this proposition and therefore are "supply siders."
http://www.econlib.org...
DRUG HARM: http://imgur.com...
Primal Diet. Lifting. Reading. Psychedelics. Cold-Approach Pickup. Music.
Deathbeforedishonour
Posts: 1,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:26:57 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Laissez-faire economics
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." ~ John 1:1

Matthew 10:22- "And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved."
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:43:36 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 7:34:57 PM, lewis20 wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

complete curiosity here, but have you taken any macro/micro econ courses?

I'm 14!! So no :( but I plan too. I got an app with info on it though.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:45:29 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 9:39:56 PM, jimtimmy wrote:
At 2/26/2012 7:06:46 PM, Mimshot wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

"Supply side" isn't an economic theory. It's a political ideology that suggests the best economic policy is to encourage supply side economic growth through measures such as removal of capital gains tax and less business regulation.


It isn't an economic theory in the same way that Keynesian, Austrian, Classical, etc. are, but it is an economic theory.

It puts a focus on government barriers to production, like regulation and high marginal tax rates. It also focuses on a more stable monetary policy.

I don't know if I would call myself a "supply sider". But, I do believe in stable monetary policy and less barriers to production. I just think that most supply siders overestimate the negative impacts of these things.

I am an adherent of New Classical economics, which advocates many supply side policies.

Whether its a theory or not, I belive in this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:51:36 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P

Yes in a way. It's Adam Smith's theory of the "invisible hand" in the market meaning you let the market do what it wants.

So in theory yes but you wouldn't need this if you were to just apply laissez faire economics in the first place.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:51:44 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Is spelt it wrong XD
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:52:07 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:51:44 PM, 16kadams wrote:
Is spelt it wrong XD

Really Phone? Really?
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:52:38 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:51:36 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P

Yes in a way. It's Adam Smith's theory of the "invisible hand" in the market meaning you let the market do what it wants.

So in theory yes but you wouldn't need this if you were to just apply laissez faire economics in the first place.

Eh I see.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
ConservativePolitico
Posts: 8,210
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:53:06 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:52:38 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:51:36 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P

Yes in a way. It's Adam Smith's theory of the "invisible hand" in the market meaning you let the market do what it wants.

So in theory yes but you wouldn't need this if you were to just apply laissez faire economics in the first place.

Eh I see.

Exactly.
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/26/2012 11:56:34 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:53:06 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:52:38 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:51:36 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P

Yes in a way. It's Adam Smith's theory of the "invisible hand" in the market meaning you let the market do what it wants.

So in theory yes but you wouldn't need this if you were to just apply laissez faire economics in the first place.

Eh I see.

Exactly.

XD
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
16kadams
Posts: 10,497
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/27/2012 12:00:54 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:56:34 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:53:06 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:52:38 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:51:36 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:50:18 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:49:11 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:48:01 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:47:30 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:46:21 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 11:45:21 PM, ConservativePolitico wrote:
Complete laissez faire economics.

Interesting.

Why?

No reason. I still like this:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org...

That's a strategy used within an economic system not an economic system.

Yes it's a laussie fair variation I think :P

Yes in a way. It's Adam Smith's theory of the "invisible hand" in the market meaning you let the market do what it wants.

So in theory yes but you wouldn't need this if you were to just apply laissez faire economics in the first place.

Eh I see.

Exactly.

XD

Aren't they fully against taxes? In that case I am for a capitalistic supply side variation, as it implies low taxes, but at least it doesn't say none.
https://www.youtube.com...
https://rekonomics.wordpress.com...
"A trend is a trend, but the question is, will it bend? Will it alter its course through some unforeseen force and come to a premature end?" -- Alec Cairncross
lewis20
Posts: 5,093
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/27/2012 12:05:38 AM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 2/26/2012 11:43:36 PM, 16kadams wrote:
At 2/26/2012 7:34:57 PM, lewis20 wrote:
At 2/26/2012 5:57:00 PM, 16kadams wrote:
I just wanna know. I support supply side XD.

complete curiosity here, but have you taken any macro/micro econ courses?

I'm 14!! So no :( but I plan too. I got an app with info on it though.

Ahh only 14, I was a Limbaugh, O'reilly conservative when I was that age too...I predict it's only a matter of time until you're sporting a Ron Paul yard sign and reading Hayek.
I'm sure you've seen this but it got me to read The Fatal Conceit, good stuff if you're interested in it.
The anti-war mentality Is only a matter of time and research too, I think.
"If you are a racist I will attack you with the north"- Abraham Lincoln

"Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material" - Leviticus 19 19

"War is a racket" - Smedley Butler