Total Posts:10|Showing Posts:1-10
Jump to topic:

induced indigence.

falconduler
Posts: 228
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2012 4:55:47 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Affirmative action programs,racial set asides, scholarships, preferrential hiring based on race and the political pressures that go with it all, are nothing more than a bunch of exaggerated protective measures for the asocial and less valuable in american society.
and it all stems from a misdirected sense of humanitarianism . this in turn has led to an ever increasing and stronger presense of asocial groups in the general population.The groups are various and include the chronic work shy,the drug addicted, the alcoholic and degenerates. ;all carriers of bad genes.
if one looks at the black and minority groups and the high crime stats they enjoy , it becomes clearly evident that our economic woes have little to do with balance of trade and deficits but more with the racial imbalance in the usa.
we are supporting a huge surplus population of useless eaters and we need to put in place eugenic sterilization.
ax123man
Posts: 317
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/26/2012 6:09:35 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
we are supporting a huge surplus population of useless eaters and we need to put in place eugenic sterilization.

How do you decide who gets sterilized?
How will you deal with the fact that those you choose will have many close friends and family that are not chosen and disagree with you (strongly).
Will your program attempt to distinguish between the affect of nurture vs nature? If so, how? If not, then what is the point of sterilizing a person who just happened to be born into a bad situation?
falconduler
Posts: 228
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/27/2012 4:13:23 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 11/26/2012 6:09:35 PM, ax123man wrote:
we are supporting a huge surplus population of useless eaters and we need to put in place eugenic sterilization.

How do you decide who gets sterilized?
How will you deal with the fact that those you choose will have many close friends and family that are not chosen and disagree with you (strongly).
Will your program attempt to distinguish between the affect of nurture vs nature? If so, how? If not, then what is the point of sterilizing a person who just happened to be born into a bad situation?

Firstly the usa had a good eugenics program ;at least most of the states.
margaret sanger was good.

Who gets sterilized and who doesn't is an easy question. ;given the high tech and genome expertise that we currently have at our disposal.
just take a look at the high number of down syndrome, autistic, and children addicted to crack that will die , children who suffer from aids and the list grows larger and larger,.
simply those who suffer or carry hereditary diseases or have criminal dispositions would be high on the list.
and then abortions and birth control would also be used.
this needs to start somewhere . and at the gynecologist office is a good place to begin.
those that object will no longer object once they understand the cost benefits to society. and how this will improve the population going forward.
no one in a bad situation need worry.
in fact future generations of americans will look back and bless us.
ax123man
Posts: 317
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/1/2012 9:37:14 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
Who gets sterilized and who doesn't is an easy question. ;given the high tech and genome expertise that we currently have at our disposal.
just take a look at the high number of down syndrome, autistic, and children addicted to crack that will die , children who suffer from aids and the list grows larger and larger,.
simply those who suffer or carry hereditary diseases or have criminal dispositions would be high on the list.
and then abortions and birth control would also be used.
this needs to start somewhere . and at the gynecologist office is a good place to begin.
those that object will no longer object once they understand the cost benefits to society. and how this will improve the population going forward.
no one in a bad situation need worry.
in fact future generations of americans will look back and bless us.

I see, genetics. Have you had your own genes checked? You may think your safe til that recessive gene shows up.
falconduler
Posts: 228
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/3/2012 4:20:53 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 12/2/2012 1:43:51 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
What does this have to do with economics?
For an economy to work ,it requires a capable work force and a moral system that can guide a nation towards prosperity ,fairness, and unity of purpose. you can't do any of that with about 90-100 million surplus population consisting of asocials and work shy degenerates . folks with bad genes.
Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/4/2012 8:15:43 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 12/3/2012 4:20:53 PM, falconduler wrote:
At 12/2/2012 1:43:51 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
What does this have to do with economics?
For an economy to work ,it requires a capable work force and a moral system that can guide a nation towards prosperity ,fairness, and unity of purpose. you can't do any of that with about 90-100 million surplus population consisting of asocials and work shy degenerates . folks with bad genes.

Prove that genetics dictate productivity or gtfo.
President of DDO
drafterman
Posts: 18,870
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/4/2012 8:49:46 PM
Posted: 4 years ago
At 12/3/2012 4:20:53 PM, falconduler wrote:
At 12/2/2012 1:43:51 AM, Wallstreetatheist wrote:
What does this have to do with economics?
For an economy to work ,it requires a capable work force and a moral system that can guide a nation towards prosperity ,fairness, and unity of purpose. you can't do any of that with about 90-100 million surplus population consisting of asocials and work shy degenerates . folks with bad genes.

Like folks who can't figure out where to place their fvcking commas?
CarefulNow
Posts: 780
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/19/2012 5:16:57 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 11/27/2012 4:13:23 PM, falconduler wrote:
just take a look at the high number of down syndrome, autistic, and children addicted to crack that will die , children who suffer from aids and the list grows larger and larger,.

It seems you're confusing heredity and genetics. While down syndrome and autism are genetic, inheritance of crack addiction and AIDS is purely environmental, the environment being the womb.

no one in a bad situation need worry.

Except for the unemployed, your "work shy". But capitalism can never achieve full employment, not even with most eager beavers. That's because resources are committed prior to the realization of value, which means two things:

1) Half the time, the supply of labor is greater than the capitalist anticipated, and

2) Capitalists are risk-averse, for completely rational reasons, which means they actually invest less than that which would employ the supply of labor they predict.
DudeWithoutTheE
Posts: 53
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/26/2012 1:14:21 PM
Posted: 3 years ago
At 12/4/2012 8:15:43 PM, Danielle wrote:

Prove that genetics dictate productivity or gtfo.

He loses if he proves that, since it would demonstrate that these people's inability to contribute isn't in any sense their fault. If a human being is in need through no fault of her own, one might expect morality to require furnishing her with life's essentials.