Total Posts:33|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Imperialistic economics

Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics

But im sure war time econonics is a phrase
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 6:06:29 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics


But im sure war time econonics is a phrase

War time economy is a phrase, but it's not a field of economics.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 7:04:30 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 6:06:29 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics


But im sure war time econonics is a phrase

War time economy is a phrase, but it's not a field of economics.

I wish I was as smart as you when it came to economics :*(
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 7:08:37 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 7:04:30 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 6:06:29 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics


But im sure war time econonics is a phrase

War time economy is a phrase, but it's not a field of economics.

I wish I was as smart as you when it came to economics :*(

Didn't you call me economically illiterate just yesterday?
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/19/2016 8:31:00 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 7:08:37 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 7:04:30 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 6:06:29 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics


But im sure war time econonics is a phrase

War time economy is a phrase, but it's not a field of economics.

I wish I was as smart as you when it came to economics :*(

Didn't you call me economically illiterate just yesterday?

I was joking. If you read past my joke you would see that i defended you.

I mean i still dont agree with your economic system which is basically a no government free market system.

Stop being sensitive
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 1:21:25 AM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 8:31:00 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 7:08:37 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 7:04:30 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 6:06:29 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:35:21 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:31:06 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:25:18 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/19/2016 5:18:24 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Imperialist economics doesn't exist...

Sorry wrong phrase. I meant war time econonics. Like the nazis

That still doesn't exist. You can't just take a phrase and add economics to it and act like it exists.

Your right on the imperialistic ecobomics


But im sure war time econonics is a phrase

War time economy is a phrase, but it's not a field of economics.

I wish I was as smart as you when it came to economics :*(

Didn't you call me economically illiterate just yesterday?

I was joking. If you read past my joke you would see that i defended you.

I mean i still dont agree with your economic system which is basically a no government free market system.

Stop being sensitive

I believe in a government, I just don't think it should interfere in the economy.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
lannan13
Posts: 23,106
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 2:43:49 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?

Colonies can be worth more trouble than they're worth. It hinges more on Merchantilism than Capitalism.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-Lannan13'S SIGNATURE-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

If the sky's the limit then why do we have footprints on the Moon? I'm shooting my aspirations for the stars.

"If you are going through hell, keep going." "Sir Winston Churchill

"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent." "Eleanor Roosevelt

Topics I want to debate. (http://tinyurl.com...)
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 11:01:05 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?
Imperialism? What are you, a Marxist-Leninist? an FSB internet troll? :D

If you mean how the big guys--U.S., China--set the rules, then just read the news. You can't miss the big players.

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?
You're info's outdated, Boris. If you're looking for oil, invade Russia (https://www.cia.gov...).
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 11:39:11 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/20/2016 11:01:05 PM, NHN wrote:
At 8/19/2016 4:50:36 PM, Capital wrote:
How would it work for a country right now in the modern age?
Imperialism? What are you, a Marxist-Leninist? an FSB internet troll? :D

If you mean how the big guys--U.S., China--set the rules, then just read the news. You can't miss the big players.

Probably multiple wars in the middle east to take over oil reserves?
You're info's outdated, Boris. If you're looking for oil, invade Russia (https://www.cia.gov...).

Lol why invade a nuclear power when you have savager muslims in the middle east to take care of?
Im not a Nazi
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 11:56:18 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/20/2016 11:39:11 PM, Capital wrote:
Lol why invade a nuclear power when you have savager muslims in the middle east to take care of?
I was being facetious.

That said, nuclear capability didn't stop China from deploying a million troops against us in the Korean War (1950-53), or from attacking India in 1962, and that was just to kill border patrol guards who may have strayed too close to Chinese territory. Great powers are reckless, especially land powers.

And Boris, check out the world of geopolitics if you want to get a closer look at the necessities surrounding war and conquest. It is land power (Russia, China, Byzantine Rome) versus sea power (U.S., U.K., Carthage), and a sea power will never serve its own interests by being bogged down in a war of ground forces. Controlling commerce on the high seas and having others fight one's wars are key ingredients to keeping the aggressive land power at bay. You see, by keeping trade lanes open and tariffs to a minimum, it is possible to acquire oil cheaply without the hassle of extraction.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/20/2016 11:56:18 PM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:39:11 PM, Capital wrote:
Lol why invade a nuclear power when you have savager muslims in the middle east to take care of?
I was being facetious.

That said, nuclear capability didn't stop China from deploying a million troops against us in the Korean War (1950-53), or from attacking India in 1962, and that was just to kill border patrol guards who may have strayed too close to Chinese territory. Great powers are reckless, especially land powers.

And Boris, check out the world of geopolitics if you want to get a closer look at the necessities surrounding war and conquest. It is land power (Russia, China, Byzantine Rome) versus sea power (U.S., U.K., Carthage), and a sea power will never serve its own interests by being bogged down in a war of ground forces. Controlling commerce on the high seas and having others fight one's wars are key ingredients to keeping the aggressive land power at bay. You see, by keeping trade lanes open and tariffs to a minimum, it is possible to acquire oil cheaply without the hassle of extraction.

So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Im not a Nazi
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered
Im not a Nazi
NHN
Posts: 624
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 12:16:18 AM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered
Too mountainous. Imagine Obama's moronic 2010 "troop surge" in Afghanistan to the umpteenth power. A terrain impossible to protect from insurgents.

Moreover, Chile, Colombia, and Peru are already tied to the U.S. economy via free trade agreements. As with Mexico, there's no point. And Brazil is cordoned off by the Amazon jungle.
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:40:11 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties

Treaties shmeaties

US can do whatever they hell they want
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:41:31 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:40:11 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties

Treaties shmeaties

US can do whatever they hell they want

Not really
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:59:04 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:41:31 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:40:11 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties

Treaties shmeaties

US can do whatever they hell they want

Not really

Unless we just bomb them
Im not a Nazi
bballcrook21
Posts: 4,468
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 8:59:45 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:59:04 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:41:31 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:40:11 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties

Treaties shmeaties

US can do whatever they hell they want

Not really

Unless we just bomb them

That's exactly what we can't do
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. - Friedman

Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. -Friedman

Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. - Friedman

Society will never be free until the last Democrat is strangled with the entrails of the last Communist.
Capital
Posts: 588
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/21/2016 9:09:59 PM
Posted: 3 months ago
At 8/21/2016 8:59:45 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:59:04 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:41:31 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:40:11 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:36:23 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:33:48 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:24:59 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 8:23:34 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 7:57:22 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 5:09:31 PM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 4:25:27 PM, bballcrook21 wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:09:42 AM, Capital wrote:
At 8/21/2016 12:07:43 AM, NHN wrote:
At 8/20/2016 11:59:09 PM, Capital wrote:
So your saying....We should invade Mexcio!
Bahaha! Invade and plunder Mexico's ... what, exactly? Outsourced American industries? Tourists? Dope and prostitution rings? All of which already constitute an extended part of the American economic imperium.

I'm really sorry, Boris. Your land-power mentality is unfit for a sea power, not even close to what is relevant for our national interest. You were born in the wrong era. The only three entities fighting for territorial conquest today are China, Russia, and the Islamic State. Take your pick and join the foreign legion closest to your desires. :D

Huh I guess your right. I wonder if we take all of South America there would be many natural resources to be plundered

War is too costly in the short term to constitute immediate benefits in the next 50-100 years.

So how did hitler make a great ecobomy just by plundering the other european nations?

He didn't make a great economy, nor did he do it by plundering European nations. This isn't the Middle Ages, there is no gold to plunder. War is too costly to sustain nations.

Damn it my plan to enslave the hispanics is ruined!

Well, that plan is already ruined by the fact that there is an international community dedicated to ensuring an end to military conflicts and slavery...

Oh right the UN. Yeah I'm goibg to put con on them in issues

The UN and hundreds of military treaties

Treaties shmeaties

US can do whatever they hell they want

Not really

Unless we just bomb them

That's exactly what we can't do

WHY IS THE WORLD SO COMPLICATED
Im not a Nazi