Total Posts:1|Showing Posts:1-1
Jump to topic:

Why it was all better in the old days: part 2

KingDebater
Posts: 687
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
12/16/2013 10:40:42 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
The first edition: http://www.debate.org...

The topic here is the X Factor. Last night, ITV1 broadcasted adverts, filler, more filler, reminders of who the 2 finalists are in case you forgot, more filler, and at the end, they announced who won - the only thing people watched it for.

Back in the old days (i.e: pre-2003), we never had this X Factor rubbish, dragging on forever. But you've got to watch it, because Mum wants to find out who wins.

One of the judges is Sharon Osbourne, who winner, Sam Bailey, describes as an inspiration despite the fact that she's only famous because of her husband, and now, Sam Bailey has the same level of fame because she won the X Factor. Both take the same amount of raw natural talent.

*To give this moan the same effect as the X Factor final, just watch the video for ten minutes before reading the rest*

Welcome back to the X Factor moan, the lines are now closed, we'll see you after the break.

*second ad break*

We now have Nicole Luxuryadvert-shizasherzer, who has less phrases than a talking elmo doll:

- That was shamazing!
- You nailed that song!
- You made it your own!

*third ad break*

Welcome back to the non-live X Factor moan. I can now reveal that our verdict on the X Factor is....................................................................................................................................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.

..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

That it's rubbish