Total Posts:51|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Was Andrew Jackson a tyrant?

Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:26:22 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

What do you know about Zionism? Please, do enlighten me.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not suprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.
Technition
Posts: 29
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:30:04 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I kinda liked Andrew Jackson as an American hero when he defended Baton Rouge from the British, until I learned he was racist. When the Spanish left Florida they had forts that were occupied by slaves. Andrew Jackson ordered cannons to be fired in them until all the slaves were dead.
To bad I can't have all caps...
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not suprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not suprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:48:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:30:04 PM, Technition wrote:
I kinda liked Andrew Jackson as an American hero when he defended Baton Rouge from the British, until I learned he was racist. When the Spanish left Florida they had forts that were occupied by slaves. Andrew Jackson ordered cannons to be fired in them until all the slaves were dead.

He was a brave, but cruel leader. A true double-edged sword in the sense that his actions were unnecessarily cruel, but he also remained brave even in the face of certain death. (He survived several assassination attempts and gentleman's duels)
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:49:35 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not suprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

And they have the nerve to insult and mock Hispanics and make it seem like being Hispanic is anamymous with low moral fiber. Like we're all immoral and live immoral lifestyles.
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:50:17 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not suprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

Snobby bastards
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:55:48 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

It was legal in Israel to deny autistic people help until 1998. Never apologized for it. The KKK runs deep in Israel.
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:58:08 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Wait, Denmark, Scotland and Sweden -- ALL allies of Israel

England, France, Spain and Italy -- they do the right thing and stay NEUTRAL.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 9:58:56 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.

You fail to comprehend the questions and replies I make... at-least this is the impression I am getting from your seemingly off-base responses. I didn't ask why you don't like Judaism, which is more of the umbrella that encompasses Zionism rather than being Zionism in itself. You've also still failed to either comprehend or respond to my question of what does Zionism have to do with Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears... unless you are seriously trying to make a connection from Zionism -> Judaism -> Protestantism -> Andrew Jackson.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:01:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.

This is because Germany is allied with the U.S. which has oil and other resource based interest's in the middle eastern region - a region where Israeli is the one and only representative of U.S. interests in terms of resources. It is the 'front line' country and ally of the U.S. - hence why we send it so much support, both financially and militarily.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:01:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:58:56 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.

You fail to comprehend the questions and replies I make... at-least this is the impression I am getting from your seemingly off-base responses. I didn't ask why you don't like Judaism, which is more of the umbrella that encompasses Zionism rather than being Zionism in itself. You've also still failed to either comprehend or respond to my question of what does Zionism have to do with Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears... unless you are seriously trying to make a connection from Zionism -> Judaism -> Protestantism -> Andrew Jackson.

Oh no connection, I just stated Zionism about Denmark siding with Israel. It just so happens that the part of England Jackson is from is heavily Germanic and never was invaded by the Romans.
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:03:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:01:26 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.

This is because Germany is allied with the U.S. which has oil and other resource based interest's in the middle eastern region - a region where Israeli is the one and only representative of U.S. interests in terms of resources. It is the 'front line' country and ally of the U.S. - hence why we send it so much support, both financially and militarily.

No I said that Denmark, like many who fought against the Germans, is sided with Israel
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:03:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:55:48 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

It was legal in Israel to deny autistic people help until 1998. Never apologized for it. The KKK runs deep in Israel.

So what? In many middle eastern regions it's still illegal for women to do anything more than live a life of a lap dog for oppressive men. There are cruel and unjust situations all over the world. Get over it. As for the KKK claim, prove it.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:04:16 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 9:58:08 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Wait, Denmark, Scotland and Sweden -- ALL allies of Israel

England, France, Spain and Italy -- they do the right thing and stay NEUTRAL.

"they do the right thing..." That is an extremely subjective claim and certainly not one held by every person.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:04:41 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:01:26 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.

This is because Germany is allied with the U.S. which has oil and other resource based interest's in the middle eastern region - a region where Israeli is the one and only representative of U.S. interests in terms of resources. It is the 'front line' country and ally of the U.S. - hence why we send it so much support, both financially and militarily.

Denmark is sided with Israel

Germany, while it's hard to say sometimes, still doesn't like Israel. You think they're still not mad at Britain, Denmark, for centuries of oppression and humiliation.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:04:52 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:01:54 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:58:56 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.

You fail to comprehend the questions and replies I make... at-least this is the impression I am getting from your seemingly off-base responses. I didn't ask why you don't like Judaism, which is more of the umbrella that encompasses Zionism rather than being Zionism in itself. You've also still failed to either comprehend or respond to my question of what does Zionism have to do with Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears... unless you are seriously trying to make a connection from Zionism -> Judaism -> Protestantism -> Andrew Jackson.

Oh no connection, I just stated Zionism about Denmark siding with Israel. It just so happens that the part of England Jackson is from is heavily Germanic and never was invaded by the Romans.

Wonderful, thank you for the history lesson.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:06:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:04:52 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 10:01:54 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:58:56 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.

You fail to comprehend the questions and replies I make... at-least this is the impression I am getting from your seemingly off-base responses. I didn't ask why you don't like Judaism, which is more of the umbrella that encompasses Zionism rather than being Zionism in itself. You've also still failed to either comprehend or respond to my question of what does Zionism have to do with Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears... unless you are seriously trying to make a connection from Zionism -> Judaism -> Protestantism -> Andrew Jackson.

Oh no connection, I just stated Zionism about Denmark siding with Israel. It just so happens that the part of England Jackson is from is heavily Germanic and never was invaded by the Romans.

Wonderful, thank you for the history lesson.

Well Northumberland is what I'm talking about. Northumberland was above Hadrian's Wall. So the Romans never touched them.

And Jackson is not the only one. Polk (who was Scottish) is another piece of ---- who should have had his cojones chopped off in battle with Mexico. That would have put his Klan a-- in his place.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:06:31 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:03:11 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 10:01:26 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.

This is because Germany is allied with the U.S. which has oil and other resource based interest's in the middle eastern region - a region where Israeli is the one and only representative of U.S. interests in terms of resources. It is the 'front line' country and ally of the U.S. - hence why we send it so much support, both financially and militarily.

No I said that Denmark, like many who fought against the Germans, is sided with Israeli

Okay, so the Zionism factor is connected by his country of ancestry being allied with Israeli? Brilliant.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...
Adam2
Posts: 1,024
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:07:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:04:52 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 10:01:54 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:58:56 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:53:40 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

Well Judaism, much like some forms of Protestantism, is an orthodox religion. Until 1998, in Israel, autistic people in Israel were pretty much second class citizens. And I know they hate tomboys too. Judaism is a very puritan religion, much like Lutheranism. That's why I don't like it. Neither really.

You fail to comprehend the questions and replies I make... at-least this is the impression I am getting from your seemingly off-base responses. I didn't ask why you don't like Judaism, which is more of the umbrella that encompasses Zionism rather than being Zionism in itself. You've also still failed to either comprehend or respond to my question of what does Zionism have to do with Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears... unless you are seriously trying to make a connection from Zionism -> Judaism -> Protestantism -> Andrew Jackson.

Oh no connection, I just stated Zionism about Denmark siding with Israel. It just so happens that the part of England Jackson is from is heavily Germanic and never was invaded by the Romans.

Wonderful, thank you for the history lesson.

I'm sorry you thought I was making a connection. They were two different situations. I just brought up Denmark being pro-Israeli.
Blade-of-Truth
Posts: 5,036
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/6/2014 10:07:27 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 4/6/2014 10:04:41 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 10:01:26 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:54:37 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:51:58 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:48:34 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:46:37 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:28:27 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:24:27 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
At 4/6/2014 9:15:46 PM, Adam2 wrote:
At 4/6/2014 3:14:14 PM, Blade-of-Truth wrote:
Tyrant - a ruler who has complete power over a country and who is cruel and unfair. [1]

The definition alone provides the answer. No, Andrew Jackson was not a tyrant.

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...

He led the Trail of Tears against the Native Americans. Typical Scandinavian if you ask me. We seen it with the Zionist pigs in Denmark.

Then you should have stated that Andrew Jackson was cruel, not a tyrant.

Still a tyrant. Hell I think it's a Scandinavian trait. Not surprisingly, his ancestry is from Northumberland, which was the only part of England never invaded by the Romans. Two it's strongly Anglo-Saxon, much like the Scottish Lowlands. That's beside the point. He stole land from the natives, in the name of his religion.
Proves that Northumberland is a place of pure Klansman activity. Worse than Hitler.

Did you miss the definition of tyrant that I shared earlier? He stole land but not on his own accord; the government had a balanced power structure (Executive, Judicial, Legislative) which is still in place today in order to assure that the acting President cannot commit acts of cruelty on his own accord. It would be more accurate for you to say that what the American Government did to the Native Americans was an act of cruelty. It is also important to show how Zionism has anything to do with what happened to the Native Americans, which you have failed to do - aside from making some abstract connection between his ancestry and his actions.

Well it runs in his people's blood. We saw what Denmark did to Greenland, what Sweden did to Finland, and later on Scotland in the Americas, under James I. All those countries to this day act so f--king proud of it too. It really makes me wanna wipe the smiles off all those faces.

You still haven't explained what Zionism has to do with any of this.

Also, the claim that it ran in his people's blood is as intelligent a claim as saying blacks are savages because it runs in their blood... (based on the history of countless tribal wars that has and still continues to permeate throughout the continent of Africa).

And Denmark like many of the historical allies that fought against Germany, sides with the Jewish state like it's their bro.

This is because Germany is allied with the U.S. which has oil and other resource based interest's in the middle eastern region - a region where Israeli is the one and only representative of U.S. interests in terms of resources. It is the 'front line' country and ally of the U.S. - hence why we send it so much support, both financially and militarily.

Denmark is sided with Israel

Germany, while it's hard to say sometimes, still doesn't like Israel. You think they're still not mad at Britain, Denmark, for centuries of oppression and humiliation.

I never said such a thing. It is not my place to make assumptions.
Debate.org Deputy Vote Moderator
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DDO Voting Guide: http://www.debate.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Need a judge on your debate? Nominate me! http://www.debate.org...