Total Posts:38|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Quickfire Mafia - Day 4

Danielle
Posts: 21,330
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:02:50 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
LIVING

Vi_Veri
CCstate
nonentity
Nags

DEAD

bluesteel - You're the role blocker (mafia).
Suitecakes - You're the watcher (town).
InsertNameHere - You're the bodyguard (town).
LaissezFaire - You're the goon (mafia).
Askbob - You're the beloved princess (town).

3 votes to carry out a lynch... The day phase will end ~ 11:15

Due to Askbob's death, there will not be a night phase!

As soon as I call the day phase, I will start another dp thread.
President of DDO
nonentity
Posts: 5,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:05:44 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
I tried to kill nags for inactivity but it failed obviously...

And no, it was an honest question because I thought the mafia had to night kill together.
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:06:18 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:05:01 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:04:35 PM, Nags wrote:
Lynch nonentity.

LF defended her last dp.

But we all defended her by unvoting...

Why would a mafioso defend a townie?
nonentity
Posts: 5,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:06:20 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:05:44 PM, nonentity wrote:
I tried to kill nags for inactivity but it failed obviously...

And no, it was an honest question because I thought the mafia had to night kill together.

Sorry, I thought you meant I defended him....
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:07:32 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:06:18 PM, Nags wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:05:01 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:04:35 PM, Nags wrote:
Lynch nonentity.

LF defended her last dp.

But we all defended her by unvoting...

Why would a mafioso defend a townie?

for some reason I didn't think that through unvote
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:08:01 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:07:29 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
nonentity, what powers did you get as JOAT

investigate kill and protect. She can use them each once
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:08:32 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Ok, there are only 4 of us left. We should all role reveal. Are you all in agreement?
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:08:33 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:08:01 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:07:29 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
nonentity, what powers did you get as JOAT

investigate kill and protect. She can use them each once

Where'd she say that?
nonentity
Posts: 5,008
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:09:07 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:07:29 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
nonentity, what powers did you get as JOAT

NP1 I investigated askbob and he came up innocent. NP2 I protected myself. NP3 I tried to kill nags but he's still alive...
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:09:10 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:08:33 PM, Nags wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:08:01 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:07:29 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
nonentity, what powers did you get as JOAT

investigate kill and protect. She can use them each once

Where'd she say that?

Nvm, I see it.
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:09:52 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:08:32 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
Ok, there are only 4 of us left. We should all role reveal. Are you all in agreement?

Yep, there's no point in pressuring anymore. I indirectly said vanilla townie last day phase, now I'm directly saying it
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:10:02 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
OK, EVERYONE ROLE REVEAL

nonentity- JOAT
nags-
CC-
Vi - TRACKER
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:10:55 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:10:08 PM, nonentity wrote:
Even if we VTNL we still have an extra day phase.

we don't have a night phase this time
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:12:31 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:11:59 PM, nonentity wrote:
ccstate, LF also claimed vanilla...? You jumping on him might have been a plan to get suspicion off you?

I jumped on him when he counter claimed me. It's a common practice
Vi_Veri
Posts: 4,487
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:13:10 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:11:31 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
Vi, who did you track each night?

First night I tracked you - you vistited no one

Second night I tracked non-entity - she visited no one --- and Lwerd told me that if she visited herself that she would tell me she visited herself. Nonentity said she protected herself this night, so Finger of Suspicion on Nonentity right now

Third night phase I tracked askbob and he visited no one - since he is princess
I could give a f about no haters as long as my ishes love me.
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2011 11:14:25 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 2/22/2011 11:13:10 PM, Vi_Veri wrote:
At 2/22/2011 11:11:31 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
Vi, who did you track each night?

First night I tracked you - you vistited no one

Second night I tracked non-entity - she visited no one --- and Lwerd told me that if she visited herself that she would tell me she visited herself. Nonentity said she protected herself this night, so Finger of Suspicion on Nonentity right now

Third night phase I tracked askbob and he visited no one - since he is princess

I'll hand of suspicion nonentity, if nags claims what I think he will, I'm voting for nonentity