Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

All men should be chemically castrated.

Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:25:44 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?

Yes, I'm thing just surgically removing the testicles might be better. That will affect hormone balance as well, but in a way that extends life span.
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:36:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:25:44 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?

Yes, I'm thing just surgically removing the testicles might be better. That will affect hormone balance as well, but in a way that extends life span.

I am anticipating that you are insincere about this notion you are advancing with the intent to induce a humorous reaction, because otherwise I have failed to perceive this post earnestly
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:36:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:25:44 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?

Yes, I'm thing just surgically removing the testicles might be better. That will affect hormone balance as well, but in a way that extends life span.

I am anticipating that you are insincere about this notion you are advancing with the intent to induce a humorous reaction, because otherwise I have failed to perceive this post earnestly
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:36:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:25:44 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?

Yes, I'm thing just surgically removing the testicles might be better. That will affect hormone balance as well, but in a way that extends life span.

I am anticipating that you are insincere about this notion you are advancing with the intent to induce a humorous reaction, because otherwise I have failed to perceive this post earnestly
intellectuallyprimitive
Posts: 1,000
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 1:37:16 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 1:36:25 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:25:44 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:23:41 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:17:20 AM, Wylted wrote:
At 8/7/2014 1:10:40 AM, intellectuallyprimitive wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

Are you suggesting that this be compulsory?

Absolutely, just like vaccinations.

Would chemically castrating reduce a mans hormonal balance?

Yes, I'm thing just surgically removing the testicles might be better. That will affect hormone balance as well, but in a way that extends life span.

I am anticipating that you are insincere about this notion you are advancing with the intent to induce a humorous reaction, because otherwise I have failed to perceive this post earnestly

I don't know why that was posted three times.
Khaos_Mage
Posts: 23,214
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 3:47:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

I've heard that ejaculation is good for the prostate, or something along those lines. (getting off is good for you)

Does this affect any negative effects in that regard? How does this extend life span?
My work here is, finally, done.
Wylted
Posts: 21,167
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
8/7/2014 3:54:53 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/7/2014 3:47:05 PM, Khaos_Mage wrote:
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

I've heard that ejaculation is good for the prostate, or something along those lines. (getting off is good for you)

Does this affect any negative effects in that regard? How does this extend life span?

I think once your castrated your testosterone is significantly reduced. Estrogen levels go up and diseases like prostate cancer no longer affect you.

This is just speculation. I have no ideal what causes prostate cancer.

Of course men have a higher rate of heart related deaths. I wonder if castration is good for the ticker. http://m.huffpost.com...
The_Glass_Ego
Posts: 14
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/1/2014 11:17:08 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
At 8/6/2014 5:30:19 AM, Wylted wrote:
Me, whiteflame and Zarroette all agree on this. It appears that chemical castration prevents numerous STDs, extends lifespan and prevents unwanted pregnancies. Why isn't this being mandated by congress?

I don't think that the government is allowed to do things like that. If the individual doesn't have consent I'm pretty sure that that counts as an abuse of human rights. Not to say that you're being an awful person, it's just that without consent, I don't think anyone can alter a human's body. The only exception I can think of to this rule would be something that is threatening the human's life immediately, such as a bullet.

Also, I believe it was Alan Turing who was forced to undergo chemical castration, because his homosexuality was illegal in Britain at the time. He ended up impotent, and developing gynecomastia, which means that he started growing breasts. He committed suicide soon after. So yeah, I think that that wouldn't be a very nice, or healthy thing to do to an entire gender, regardless of any long term benefits it may or may not have.