Total Posts:14|Showing Posts:1-14
Jump to topic:

Did the Holocaust help win the war?

MyDinosaurHands
Posts: 203
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/31/2015 11:31:28 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Curious if anyone can provide statistics and conjectures. Do you think that Hitler used so many resources for the Holocaust that he cost himself the war?
Guess what I used to type this..

Careful! Don't laugh too hard.
ZexLiberty
Posts: 3
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/16/2015 2:52:26 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
It was probably one of the many reasons why Germany lost WWII. The Nazis had to fight battles from both the East and the West and invested resources in the Holocaust as well.
--Zex
cartidge
Posts: 14
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/18/2015 4:56:01 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/31/2015 11:31:28 PM, MyDinosaurHands wrote:
Curious if anyone can provide statistics and conjectures. Do you think that Hitler used so many resources for the Holocaust that he cost himself the war?

It is worth noting that the Holocaust was also a source of slave labour and resources - including the plunder of the murdered.
Unitomic
Posts: 591
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.
XLAV
Posts: 13,704
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 4:30:56 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM, Unitomic wrote:
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.

And if there was no holocaust, then the Jews would have screwed Germany's economy.
heil
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/22/2015 1:56:29 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 4:30:56 AM, XLAV wrote:
At 2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM, Unitomic wrote:
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.

And if there was no holocaust, then the Jews would have screwed Germany's economy.

true as this video shows https://www.youtube.com...
cartidge
Posts: 14
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/24/2015 10:24:29 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/22/2015 1:56:29 PM, heil wrote:
At 2/22/2015 4:30:56 AM, XLAV wrote:
At 2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM, Unitomic wrote:
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.

And if there was no holocaust, then the Jews would have screwed Germany's economy.

true as this video shows https://www.youtube.com...

But, you told us in your previous post that the holocaust did not occur. Which is it?
Idealist
Posts: 2,520
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/24/2015 9:37:21 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 1/31/2015 11:31:28 PM, MyDinosaurHands wrote:
Curious if anyone can provide statistics and conjectures. Do you think that Hitler used so many resources for the Holocaust that he cost himself the war?

An interesting question. In the early years Hitler accumulated a lot of wealth by simply "appropriating" it from the Jews. Many German banks were controlled by Jewish interests, and even the property and houses of ordinary Jews were confiscated for the use of "real" Germans. This was one of the ways he initially began to raise the "average" German status of living, and it helped build the German war machine. He also used Jewish slave labor in the construction of various war enterprises. There seems to be a perception today of German Jews being shaved, uneducated people, but some of them were the most intelligent people in the world (think Einstein). To be honest, I don't know that anyone has attempted to compile a strictly economical comparison on the efficacy of the Holocaust. It sounds pretty macabre.
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/25/2015 7:20:17 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Germany did put significant resources in the Holocaust but this was more than made up for by all the slave labor the Germans acquired in occupied territories. It was the fact that Hitler considered tens of millions of people in the USSR (Belarus, Ukraine, etc.) subhuman that significantly caused the German war effort to falter. The way the Nazis treated people in the Soviet Union may well have been the reason the country didn't fall to rebellion when the Germans were only 20 miles from Moscow.
heil
Posts: 22
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/27/2015 2:40:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/24/2015 10:24:29 AM, cartidge wrote:
At 2/22/2015 1:56:29 PM, heil wrote:
At 2/22/2015 4:30:56 AM, XLAV wrote:
At 2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM, Unitomic wrote:
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.

And if there was no holocaust, then the Jews would have screwed Germany's economy.

true as this video shows https://www.youtube.com...

But, you told us in your previous post that the holocaust did not occur. Which is it?

the holohoax was really just a mass justified execution of bolshevik leaders who were ruining the economy. Those bolshevik leaders were jews but there was no holocaust
Comrade_Silly_Otter
Posts: 725
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
2/27/2015 2:57:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Lots of machinery parts for tanks and the like made in concentration camps were often sabotaged by the slave workers.
anonymouse369
Posts: 1
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/1/2015 5:07:49 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Well for a start, look at the lies....... http://i.imgur.com...
6 million???? It seems to be their magic number?????? http://imgur.com...

Saving the people in the concentration camps was an after thought for all the allies, defeating Germany was the real rux of the matter, Hitler knew the jews/zionists, were and still are ruining and ruling most countries wealth and economies.
cartidge
Posts: 14
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/2/2015 12:10:43 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 2/27/2015 2:40:13 PM, heil wrote:
At 2/24/2015 10:24:29 AM, cartidge wrote:
At 2/22/2015 1:56:29 PM, heil wrote:
At 2/22/2015 4:30:56 AM, XLAV wrote:
At 2/19/2015 4:20:15 PM, Unitomic wrote:
Well. No. It didn't cost them the war. It was a source of labor while it was being performed, and honestly the net resource count used in the holocaust was simply not substantial enough to turn the tide of American and Soviet industrial might.

And if there was no holocaust, then the Jews would have screwed Germany's economy.

true as this video shows https://www.youtube.com...

But, you told us in your previous post that the holocaust did not occur. Which is it?

the holohoax was really just a mass justified execution of bolshevik leaders who were ruining the economy. Those bolshevik leaders were jews but there was no holocaust

So, who orchestrated this 'hoax' and why have the countless professional historians who have studies it not been able to debunk it?