Total Posts:92|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Hitler was Actually a Good Leader

SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%
I am groot.
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...
Otokage
Posts: 2,352
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 2:11:33 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Out of debt..........???????????

Get your facts right lol.
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 3:47:37 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Correction: a good chunk of their debt. If he hadn't invaded poland, he'd probably be the leader of a good chunk of Europe.
I am groot.
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.
I am groot.
PetersSmith
Posts: 5,849
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:22:41 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Heilbait.
Empress of DDO (also Poll and Forum "Maintenance" Moderator)

"The two most important days in your life is the day you were born, and the day you find out why."
~Mark Twain

"Wow"
-Doge

"Don't believe everything you read on the internet just because there's a picture with a quote next to it."
~Abraham Lincoln

Guide to the Polls Section: http://www.debate.org...
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:26:31 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
Ikr. But seriously, I am not condoning Hitler. He was a horrible responsible for the death of millions of innocents for the sake of his twisted worldview of extreme Aryanism, Nationalism, Fascism, and Darwinism.
I am groot.
dylancatlow
Posts: 12,251
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:50:13 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

...and only killed 9 million of them!
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!
I am groot.
SeventhProfessor
Posts: 5,089
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!
#UnbanTheMadman

#StandWithBossy

#BetOnThett

"bossy r u like 85 years old and have lost ur mind"
~mysteriouscrystals

"I've honestly never seen seventh post anything that wasn't completely idiotic in a trying-to-be-funny way."
~F-16

https://docs.google.com...
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 6:58:07 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!

My point was that he was a good leader, not a good person.
I am groot.
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.
I am groot.
SeventhProfessor
Posts: 5,089
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:14:52 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 6:58:07 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!

My point was that he was a good leader, not a good person.

He killed millions of his people, "leading" them to their deaths. He definitely wasn't a very good leader to everyone, hence he was an unfair leader.
#UnbanTheMadman

#StandWithBossy

#BetOnThett

"bossy r u like 85 years old and have lost ur mind"
~mysteriouscrystals

"I've honestly never seen seventh post anything that wasn't completely idiotic in a trying-to-be-funny way."
~F-16

https://docs.google.com...
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:16:17 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:14:52 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:58:07 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!

My point was that he was a good leader, not a good person.

He killed millions of his people, "leading" them to their deaths. He definitely wasn't a very good leader to everyone, hence he was an unfair leader.

Well, he wasn't leading them. He was only leading the people he deemed Aryans.
I am groot.
SeventhProfessor
Posts: 5,089
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:17:58 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:16:17 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:14:52 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:58:07 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!

My point was that he was a good leader, not a good person.

He killed millions of his people, "leading" them to their deaths. He definitely wasn't a very good leader to everyone, hence he was an unfair leader.

Well, he wasn't leading them. He was only leading the people he deemed Aryans.

Which in itself was poor leading. He obviously knew people in other countries wouldn't like what he was doing, so when war erupted even those he did deem worthy were sent to fight and probably die. All of which he knew, and wanted to happen.
#UnbanTheMadman

#StandWithBossy

#BetOnThett

"bossy r u like 85 years old and have lost ur mind"
~mysteriouscrystals

"I've honestly never seen seventh post anything that wasn't completely idiotic in a trying-to-be-funny way."
~F-16

https://docs.google.com...
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:20:40 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.

If your definition of an efficient leader is somebody who brainwashes a country and then commits crimes behind people's backs, then yes, Hitler was an efficient leader. Hitler was the reason Germany lost WWII, not the reason Germany fought as long as it did. For a start, Hitler let 340,000 allied troops escape at Dunkirk by ordering his troops to stop advancing on the area. Then during the battle of Britain Hitler had the Luftwaffe switch to bombing cities instead of finishing off the RAF (therefore failing to destroy it). These are two of Hitler's many mistakes that caused Germany to lose the war.
Prodigy0789
Posts: 17
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:26:26 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
He did have the majority of his citizens united under a veil of dictatorship disguised as freedom, but he left his troops with little supplies, carried out various operations without thinking of the moral or condition of his troops, and couldn't care less for his citizens.
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:45:00 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:17:58 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:16:17 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:14:52 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:58:07 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:53:51 PM, SeventhProfessor wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:51:55 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
He was still a good leader! He was dominant, tough, intimidating, rallying, and he did great stuff for the German spirit!

The main issue is that you ignore everything bad he did. If that were how we judged who was a good leader, every leader had good qualities so they're all good!

My point was that he was a good leader, not a good person.

He killed millions of his people, "leading" them to their deaths. He definitely wasn't a very good leader to everyone, hence he was an unfair leader.

Well, he wasn't leading them. He was only leading the people he deemed Aryans.

Which in itself was poor leading. He obviously knew people in other countries wouldn't like what he was doing, so when war erupted even those he did deem worthy were sent to fight and probably die. All of which he knew, and wanted to happen.

Okay, he believed they were going to fight harder than the average man. And for the most part, he was right.
I am groot.
SmallTacos
Posts: 160
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 7:53:11 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:20:40 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.

If your definition of an efficient leader is somebody who brainwashes a country and then commits crimes behind people's backs, then yes, Hitler was an efficient leader. Hitler was the reason Germany lost WWII, not the reason Germany fought as long as it did. For a start, Hitler let 340,000 allied troops escape at Dunkirk by ordering his troops to stop advancing on the area. Then during the battle of Britain Hitler had the Luftwaffe switch to bombing cities instead of finishing off the RAF (therefore failing to destroy it). These are two of Hitler's many mistakes that caused Germany to lose the war.

At least he didn't make as many mistakes as Britain or France. (The Maginot Line, Getting Routed at dunkirk, Underestimating the German power at Italy, Underestimating Rommel, Thinking bargaining with him was a solution, etc.)
I am groot.
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 8:03:19 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 7:53:11 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:20:40 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.

If your definition of an efficient leader is somebody who brainwashes a country and then commits crimes behind people's backs, then yes, Hitler was an efficient leader. Hitler was the reason Germany lost WWII, not the reason Germany fought as long as it did. For a start, Hitler let 340,000 allied troops escape at Dunkirk by ordering his troops to stop advancing on the area. Then during the battle of Britain Hitler had the Luftwaffe switch to bombing cities instead of finishing off the RAF (therefore failing to destroy it). These are two of Hitler's many mistakes that caused Germany to lose the war.

At least he didn't make as many mistakes as Britain or France. (The Maginot Line, Getting Routed at dunkirk, Underestimating the German power at Italy, Underestimating Rommel, Thinking bargaining with him was a solution, etc.)

Well he clearly made enough mistakes to end up losing the war. So that say something.
YamaVonKarma
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 8:03:19 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:53:11 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:20:40 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.

If your definition of an efficient leader is somebody who brainwashes a country and then commits crimes behind people's backs, then yes, Hitler was an efficient leader. Hitler was the reason Germany lost WWII, not the reason Germany fought as long as it did. For a start, Hitler let 340,000 allied troops escape at Dunkirk by ordering his troops to stop advancing on the area. Then during the battle of Britain Hitler had the Luftwaffe switch to bombing cities instead of finishing off the RAF (therefore failing to destroy it). These are two of Hitler's many mistakes that caused Germany to lose the war.

At least he didn't make as many mistakes as Britain or France. (The Maginot Line, Getting Routed at dunkirk, Underestimating the German power at Italy, Underestimating Rommel, Thinking bargaining with him was a solution, etc.)

Well he clearly made enough mistakes to end up losing the war. So that say something.
... why are you here, STALIN?
People who I've called as mafia DP1:
TUF, and YYW
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:03:19 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:53:11 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:20:40 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:07:19 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 7:02:58 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 6:14:52 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
At 3/23/2015 11:55:48 AM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/22/2015 8:11:35 PM, SmallTacos wrote:
I mean, he united Germany, got them out of debt and inflation, and increased their land area in peace and war by more than 200%

Ye and Germany ended up worse in 1945 than it had been before Hitler took power...

Only after 5 countries teamed up on it.

Germany also had allies during WWII. But it doesn't really matter. A person who kills millions of people simply because he doesn't like them is not a good leader.

He led people, and he led efficiently. That's what a leader is. He had 2 allies (essentially 1, since Italy was weak), and he kept up the fight against France, the UK, and Russia for 4 years before it collapsed. And then it was only because of the US.

If your definition of an efficient leader is somebody who brainwashes a country and then commits crimes behind people's backs, then yes, Hitler was an efficient leader. Hitler was the reason Germany lost WWII, not the reason Germany fought as long as it did. For a start, Hitler let 340,000 allied troops escape at Dunkirk by ordering his troops to stop advancing on the area. Then during the battle of Britain Hitler had the Luftwaffe switch to bombing cities instead of finishing off the RAF (therefore failing to destroy it). These are two of Hitler's many mistakes that caused Germany to lose the war.

At least he didn't make as many mistakes as Britain or France. (The Maginot Line, Getting Routed at dunkirk, Underestimating the German power at Italy, Underestimating Rommel, Thinking bargaining with him was a solution, etc.)

Well he clearly made enough mistakes to end up losing the war. So that say something.
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
YamaVonKarma
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 9:01:08 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
Don't fvck with me bro.
We both know you're STALIN.
People who I've called as mafia DP1:
TUF, and YYW
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 9:05:51 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 9:01:08 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
Don't fvck with me bro.
We both know you're STALIN.

I know little to nothing about this so called STALIN. However I was a supporter of his anti-bench policy and it seems that bench lied to DDO about his plan to leave the site after that one debate. STALIN knew that this was how it would turn out so he started to spam bench and his friends in an attempt to improve DDO. But Bitchabench managed to convince Airmax to ban STALIN from DDO. I was one of those poor innocents caught up in it all.
YamaVonKarma
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 9:07:12 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 9:05:51 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:01:08 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
Don't fvck with me bro.
We both know you're STALIN.

I know little to nothing about this so called STALIN. However I was a supporter of his anti-bench policy and it seems that bench lied to DDO about his plan to leave the site after that one debate. STALIN knew that this was how it would turn out so he started to spam bench and his friends in an attempt to improve DDO. But Bitchabench managed to convince Airmax to ban STALIN from DDO. I was one of those poor innocents caught up in it all.

Dude... why not just come back under your original account?
And Bench isn't that scary. He's really a big blond teddy bear!
People who I've called as mafia DP1:
TUF, and YYW
STALINist
Posts: 20
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 9:08:46 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 9:07:12 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:05:51 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:01:08 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
Don't fvck with me bro.
We both know you're STALIN.

I know little to nothing about this so called STALIN. However I was a supporter of his anti-bench policy and it seems that bench lied to DDO about his plan to leave the site after that one debate. STALIN knew that this was how it would turn out so he started to spam bench and his friends in an attempt to improve DDO. But Bitchabench managed to convince Airmax to ban STALIN from DDO. I was one of those poor innocents caught up in it all.

Dude... why not just come back under your original account?
And Bench isn't that scary. He's really a big blond teddy bear!

My original account was banned thanks to bench.
YamaVonKarma
Posts: 7,570
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/23/2015 9:09:32 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 3/23/2015 9:08:46 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:07:12 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:05:51 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 9:01:08 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:59:52 PM, STALINist wrote:
At 3/23/2015 8:45:35 PM, YamaVonKarma wrote:
... why are you here, STALIN?

Excuse me?
Don't fvck with me bro.
We both know you're STALIN.

I know little to nothing about this so called STALIN. However I was a supporter of his anti-bench policy and it seems that bench lied to DDO about his plan to leave the site after that one debate. STALIN knew that this was how it would turn out so he started to spam bench and his friends in an attempt to improve DDO. But Bitchabench managed to convince Airmax to ban STALIN from DDO. I was one of those poor innocents caught up in it all.

Dude... why not just come back under your original account?
And Bench isn't that scary. He's really a big blond teddy bear!

My original account was banned thanks to bench.
Ah... well just make a new one and don't name yourself STALIN.
People who I've called as mafia DP1:
TUF, and YYW