Total Posts:47|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Math as taught by DDO users

thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

bluesteel: Thanks to Math for creating this problem. The BOP states that I, Con, must prove that 2+2=4. Using the Arabic system of numerals....

lovelife: For some reason I can't seem to leave the class.

Koopin: If I have 91 buckets of KFC and eat 20, how many do I have left?

thegodhand forfeited this class.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any ideas?
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin
thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 10:22:08 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 10:20:40 PM, FREEDO wrote:
Yes. But I'll keep them to myself for decency.

L

o

L
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin
Marauder
Posts: 3,271
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 10:39:09 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

bluesteel: Thanks to Math for creating this problem. The BOP states that I, Con, must prove that 2+2=4. Using the Arabic system of numerals....

lovelife: For some reason I can't seem to leave the class.

Koopin: If I have 91 buckets of KFC and eat 20, how many do I have left?

thegodhand forfeited this class.

DATCMOTO: 3 nails + 1 cross = 4given
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any ideas?

are we just supposed to add to this like this?
One act of Rebellion created all the darkness and evil in the world; One life of Total Obedience created a path back to eternity and God.

A Scout is Obedient.
thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 10:47:52 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 10:39:09 PM, Marauder wrote:
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

bluesteel: Thanks to Math for creating this problem. The BOP states that I, Con, must prove that 2+2=4. Using the Arabic system of numerals....

lovelife: For some reason I can't seem to leave the class.

Koopin: If I have 91 buckets of KFC and eat 20, how many do I have left?

thegodhand forfeited this class.

DATCMOTO: 3 nails + 1 cross = 4given
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any ideas?

are we just supposed to add to this like this?

Yeah. Then I repeat after about 5~ suggestions.
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 11:17:05 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Freedo: 1 + 1 = too serious, dude.

Brian_Eggleston: If 12 Tory MP's get on the Chunnel headed for France at 10:30 AM, and the tunnel floods five minutes later, what time is it when the train runs out of air?
Time to celebrate!

Reasoning: "Math is a concept I invented." -Rothbard

Charlesb: "You are horrified at our intending to do away with private
property. But in your existing society, private property is
already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its
existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the
hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with
intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary
condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any
property for the immense majority of society.

In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your
property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.

From the moment when labour can no longer be converted into
capital, money, or rent, into a social power capable of being
monopolised, i.e., from the moment when individual property can
no longer be transformed into bourgeois property, into capital,
from that moment, you say individuality vanishes.

You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no
other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of
property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and
made impossible.

Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the
products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the
power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such
appropriation.

It has been objected that upon the abolition of private property
all work will cease, and universal laziness will overtake us.

According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone
to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those of its members who
work, acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything, do not
work. The whole of this objection is but another expression of
the tautology: that there can no longer be any wage-labour when
there is no longer any capital.

All objections urged against the Communistic mode of producing
and appropriating material products, have, in the same way,
been urged against the Communistic modes of producing and
appropriating intellectual products. Just as, to the bourgeois,
the disappearance of class property is the disappearance of
production itself, so the disappearance of class culture is to
him identical with the disappearance of all culture.

That culture, the loss of which he laments, is, for the enormous
majority, a mere training to act as a machine.

But don't wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended
abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois
notions of freedom, culture, law, etc. Your very ideas are but
the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and
bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of
your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential
character and direction are determined by the economical
conditions of existence of your class.

The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into
eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms
springing from your present mode of production and form of
property--historical relations that rise and disappear in the
progress of production--this misconception you share with every
ruling class that has preceded you. What you see clearly in the
case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal
property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of
your own bourgeois form of property.

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this
infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family,
based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed
form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this
state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of
the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its
complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of
capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of
children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations,
when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the
social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention,
direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The
Communists have not invented the intervention of society in
education; they do but seek to alter the character of that
intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the
ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about
the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the
more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all
family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their
children transformed into simple articles of commerce and
instruments of labour.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams
the whole bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production.
He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited
in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than
that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the
women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away
with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the
virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women
which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established
by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce
community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters
of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common
prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's
wives.

Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common
and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly
be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in
substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised
community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the
abolition of the present system of production must bring with it
the abolition of the community of women springing from that
system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish
countries and nationality.

The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what
they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all
acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of
the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is, so far,
itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word.

National differences and antagonisms between peoples are daily
more and more vanishing, owing to the development of the
bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world-market, to
uniformity in the mode of production and in the conditions of
life corresponding thereto.

The supremacy of the proletariat will cause them to vanish still
faster. United action, of the leading civilised countries at
least, is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of
the proletariat.

In proportion as the exploitation of one individual by another
is put an end to, the exploitation of one nation by another will
also
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 11:19:15 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 11:17:05 PM, Chrysippus wrote:
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Freedo: 1 + 1 = too serious, dude.

Brian_Eggleston: If 12 Tory MP's get on the Chunnel headed for France at 10:30 AM, and the tunnel floods five minutes later, what time is it when the train runs out of air?
Time to celebrate!

Reasoning: "Math is a concept I invented." -Rothbard

Charlesb: "You are horrified at our intending to do away with private
property. But in your existing society, private property is
already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its
existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the
hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with
intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary
condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any
property for the immense majority of society.

In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your
property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.

From the moment when labour can no longer be converted into
capital, money, or rent, into a social power capable of being
monopolised, i.e., from the moment when individual property can
no longer be transformed into bourgeois property, into capital,
from that moment, you say individuality vanishes.

You must, therefore, confess that by "individual" you mean no
other person than the bourgeois, than the middle-class owner of
property. This person must, indeed, be swept out of the way, and
made impossible.

Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the
products of society; all that it does is to deprive him of the
power to subjugate the labour of others by means of such
appropriation.

It has been objected that upon the abolition of private property
all work will cease, and universal laziness will overtake us.

According to this, bourgeois society ought long ago to have gone
to the dogs through sheer idleness; for those of its members who
work, acquire nothing, and those who acquire anything, do not
work. The whole of this objection is but another expression of
the tautology: that there can no longer be any wage-labour when
there is no longer any capital.

All objections urged against the Communistic mode of producing
and appropriating material products, have, in the same way,
been urged against the Communistic modes of producing and
appropriating intellectual products. Just as, to the bourgeois,
the disappearance of class property is the disappearance of
production itself, so the disappearance of class culture is to
him identical with the disappearance of all culture.

That culture, the loss of which he laments, is, for the enormous
majority, a mere training to act as a machine.

But don't wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended
abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois
notions of freedom, culture, law, etc. Your very ideas are but
the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and
bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of
your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential
character and direction are determined by the economical
conditions of existence of your class.

The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into
eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms
springing from your present mode of production and form of
property--historical relations that rise and disappear in the
progress of production--this misconception you share with every
ruling class that has preceded you. What you see clearly in the
case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal
property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of
your own bourgeois form of property.

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this
infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family,
based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed
form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this
state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of
the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its
complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of
capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of
children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations,
when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the
social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention,
direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The
Communists have not invented the intervention of society in
education; they do but seek to alter the character of that
intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the
ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about
the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the
more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all
family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their
children transformed into simple articles of commerce and
instruments of labour.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams
the whole bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production.
He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited
in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than
that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the
women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away
with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the
virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women
which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established
by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce
community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters
of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common
prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's
wives.

Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common
and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly
be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in
substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised
community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the
abolition of the present system of production must bring with it
the abolition of the community of women springing from that
system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish
countries and nationality.

The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what
they

We didn't start the fire :)
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin
popculturepooka
Posts: 7,924
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 11:26:33 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
Chrys I think the thing that makes your charleslb impression even more awesome/full of win is I tried to quote you but it said it was over 8,000 characters! Haha.
At 10/3/2016 11:49:13 PM, thett3 wrote:
BLACK LIVES MATTER!
Chrysippus
Posts: 2,173
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/5/2011 11:28:25 PM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 11:23:21 PM, ccstate4peat wrote:
Chrys, I really hope you just copied and pasted one of charles' posts and didn't type that out yourself...

Excerpt from the Communist Manifesto brought to you by the magic of copy/paste. Bourgeoisie c/p, no less. :)
Cavete mea inexorabilis legiones mimus!
InsertNameHere
Posts: 15,699
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:08:45 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:08:10 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:06:31 AM, InsertNameHere wrote:
Hahaha this thread is win.

Nothing created by thegodhand is win

This thread actually was though. xD
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:09:40 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:08:10 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:06:31 AM, InsertNameHere wrote:
Hahaha this thread is win.

Nothing created by thegodhand is win

How many times a day is a broken clock correct?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:11:19 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:09:40 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:08:10 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:06:31 AM, InsertNameHere wrote:
Hahaha this thread is win.

Nothing created by thegodhand is win

How many times a day is a broken clock correct?

None if it's digital
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:14:48 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:11:19 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:09:40 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:08:10 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:06:31 AM, InsertNameHere wrote:
Hahaha this thread is win.

Nothing created by thegodhand is win

How many times a day is a broken clock correct?

None if it's digital

That depends on the display technology. Nonetheless, it ceases to be a clock at that point, as it no longer indicates a time. A clock that is still a clock-- that indicates time-- that is broken-- no longer changing to keep up with time, i.e., not operating in a manner to ensure constant accuracy or approximation thereof-- will be right a nonzero number of times that is dependent on the time interval the clock was designed to measure-- for most clocks in the world, once or twice per day.

In any case, thegodhand is an organism, and therefore analog.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
FREEDO
Posts: 21,057
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:30:52 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:14:48 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:11:19 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:09:40 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:08:10 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 12:06:31 AM, InsertNameHere wrote:
Hahaha this thread is win.

Nothing created by thegodhand is win

How many times a day is a broken clock correct?

None if it's digital

That depends on the display technology. Nonetheless, it ceases to be a clock at that point, as it no longer indicates a time. A clock that is still a clock-- that indicates time-- that is broken-- no longer changing to keep up with time, i.e., not operating in a manner to ensure constant accuracy or approximation thereof-- will be right a nonzero number of times that is dependent on the time interval the clock was designed to measure-- for most clocks in the world, once or twice per day.

In any case, thegodhand is an organism, and therefore analog.

There is no time. And thus no clocks.
GRAND POOBAH OF DDO

fnord
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:51:48 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
There is no time. And thus no clocks.

I count 1, 2, 3,4 5 clocks before me. And one potential clock that is not actualized

Given this empirical evidence of 5, we can prove by contradiction that the statement "There are no clocks" or "There are 0 clocks" is false. If I hold up 5 fingers, and then I hold up zero fingers, the two are different. Yet the 5 represents our real count, and hence, the count of 0 is not equal to our real count, and hence, it is a false count.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
ccstate4peat
Posts: 2,022
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 12:59:19 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 12:51:48 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
There is no time. And thus no clocks.

I count 1, 2, 3,4 5 clocks before me. And one potential clock that is not actualized

Given this empirical evidence of 5, we can prove by contradiction that the statement "There are no clocks" or "There are 0 clocks" is false. If I hold up 5 fingers, and then I hold up zero fingers, the two are different. Yet the 5 represents our real count, and hence, the count of 0 is not equal to our real count, and hence, it is a false count.

Fück me and my mind. I like it as "My clock says it's 12:59 therefore it is 12:59"
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 1:11:41 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
that's ad aclockitatem.
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Ragnar_Rahl
Posts: 19,297
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 1:21:11 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 1:12:34 AM, ccstate4peat wrote:
At 3/6/2011 1:11:41 AM, Ragnar_Rahl wrote:
that's ad aclockitatem.

I'm sure you're really fun at parties

What's a party?
It came to be at its height. It was commanded to command. It was a capital before its first stone was laid. It was a monument to the spirit of man.
Cerebral_Narcissist
Posts: 10,806
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 5:05:12 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

64.67%
I am voting for Innomen because of his intelligence, common sense, humility and the fact that Juggle appears to listen to him. Any other Presidential style would have a large sub-section of the site up in arms. If I was President I would destroy the site though elitism, others would let it run riot. Innomen represents a middle way that works, neither draconian nor anarchic and that is the only way things can work. Plus he does it all without ego trips.
thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 8:59:42 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 5:05:12 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

64.67%

Sad part is I made up random numbers and then actauly answered them. On paper.
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin
I-am-a-panda
Posts: 15,380
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 10:00:38 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 5:05:12 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

64.67%

An unnecessarily large percentage if I do say so myself.
Pizza. I have enormous respect for Pizza.
thegodhand
Posts: 361
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
3/6/2011 10:19:06 AM
Posted: 5 years ago
At 3/6/2011 10:00:38 AM, I-am-a-panda wrote:
At 3/6/2011 5:05:12 AM, Cerebral_Narcissist wrote:
At 3/5/2011 10:16:44 PM, thegodhand wrote:
So one day some of the best DDO users got into a school and had to teach math.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I-am-a-panda: If I spend 3 minutes staring at annhasle's boobs and 18.2 minutes jacking off to them, what percent of an hour do I have left to PM her into coming over to f*ck me?

64.67%

An unnecessarily small percentage if I do say so myself.

Fix'd.
"Modern atheism is Richard Dawkins."- thegodhand

"Thegodhand likes to misquote people"- Benjamin Franklin