Total Posts:54|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Dinosaur or another creature?

Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 2:55:50 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
...or a rhino? With an artist putting scales on it maybe?
-Also, that "sculpture" was in Cambodia. The only Stegosaurus bones/skeleton ever found were in North America.

Btw... ever hear of carbon dating? Or is that a trick by Satan?
Volkov
Posts: 9,765
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 2:56:08 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Do you ever read comments on these videos you post?

BurhBurhBurh (8 hours ago)
"There is one MAJOR problem with this. This temple is in cambodia, and Stegosaurus fossils have ONLY been found in North West America. And, as you creationists keep saying, 'if you haven't dug it up, it doesn't exist, therefore evolution is false'."

I liked that one the most.

Look at this as well:

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com...

The second point is a little fizzy though it could very well be true, but the first is definitely right-on-the-spot. Just because it has depictions of plates on its back, it must be a stegosaurus? Its head doesn't look anything remotely like one, noted by the horns and the small neck/large head. Couldn't this be one of the many different lizards that run around Cambodia and Ta Prohm? I mean, here is one lizard from Cambodia that has ridges or "plates": http://www.pollsb.com... - Couldn't that be the lizard depicted?
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 2:58:54 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
It is odd.

The Jewish culture mentions the Leviathon many times.

Quite a few ancient cultures have art of dinosaurs.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:00:50 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 2:56:08 PM, Volkov wrote:
http://www.pollsb.com... - Couldn't that be the lizard depicted?

That one's head is even further off than the stegosaurus'.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:02:38 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 2:58:54 PM, wjmelements wrote:
It is odd.

The Jewish culture mentions the Leviathon many times.

Quite a few ancient cultures have art of dinosaurs.

It is called Leviathan, not Leviathon.
-It is a fictional sea monster, not a dinosaur.
-And I'm pretty sure its in the Christian Bible too.

(Unfortunately... I go to a Catholic school. I have Religion class 5 out of 7 school days.....)
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:16:23 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Never mind.

I'd heard something similar to this from another culture. It has left me, and I don't remember.
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:17:37 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 3:12:47 PM, GodSands wrote:
Pretty good evidence that man lived with dinosaurs.

1) The art isn't dated.
2) Carbon dating.
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:19:33 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
In that video, how have blood vessels been preserved? I'm curious. Does anyone know about that?
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
GodSands
Posts: 2,843
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:24:41 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
""A Dinosaur carbon dated 9,890 years and 16,000 years old NOT millions of years old like evolutionists claim" - The Bible and Radiometric dating (The problem with Carbon 14 dating and other methods)

A living mollusks was dated by using carbon 14 dating to be found at 23,000 years old.

So what are you thoughts now? Still trust these scientists who have said such methods are correct when clearly not. (I actually want your answer on this question)" Ok there we are.
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:26:03 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Carbon Dating is inherently flawed:

What about living makes all Carbon-12 into Carbon-14?
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
MistahKurtz
Posts: 400
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:27:33 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 3:24:41 PM, GodSands wrote:
""A Dinosaur carbon dated 9,890 years and 16,000 years old NOT millions of years old like evolutionists claim" - The Bible and Radiometric dating (The problem with Carbon 14 dating and other methods)

A living mollusks was dated by using carbon 14 dating to be found at 23,000 years old.

So what are you thoughts now? Still trust these scientists who have said such methods are correct when clearly not. (I actually want your answer on this question)" Ok there we are.

"Mollusks, unlike plants et al., get the carbon for their shells from ancient carbonate and not the atmosphere. Ancient carbon is already depleted in C-14. Therefore mollusk shells are inappropriate for carbon dating because they do not, even when alive, have C-14 at the level present in the atmosphere. The level of C-14 in mollusk shells reflects their source of carbonate."

From:
http://www.fsteiger.com...
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:27:55 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 3:19:33 PM, wjmelements wrote:
In that video, how have blood vessels been preserved? I'm curious. Does anyone know about that?

There are blood vessels in bones. And the bones were probably preserved very well.
MistahKurtz
Posts: 400
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 3:28:22 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 3:25:57 PM, GodSands wrote:
: At 6/16/2009 3:23:37 PM, MistahKurtz wrote:
http://www.crystalinks.com...

My God, eagle-people existed too! It's proof!


I think they may have been masks?

And perhaps the carving in the OP was just a rhino with bark stuck on its back.
Puck
Posts: 6,457
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 4:06:33 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
As for carbon dating a dinosaur fossil - learn your physics - there is a reason why it is not the standard for dating fossils. :)
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/16/2009 7:55:40 PM
Posted: 7 years ago
Allow me to repeat myself:

What is it about life that makes all the Carbon 12 into Carbon 14?
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
Puck
Posts: 6,457
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 12:36:36 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/16/2009 7:55:40 PM, wjmelements wrote:
Allow me to repeat myself:

What is it about life that makes all the Carbon 12 into Carbon 14?

O.o If you are refering to carbon dating - the difference between carbon-12 and carbon-14 at death is the same in all living things - carbon-12 however doesn't decay like carbon-14 does and it's the ratio of carbon-14 decay to carbon-12 that is the determinant of age.
GodSands
Posts: 2,843
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 12:51:01 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
: At 6/17/2009 12:36:36 AM, Puck wrote:
At 6/16/2009 7:55:40 PM, wjmelements wrote:
Allow me to repeat myself:

What is it about life that makes all the Carbon 12 into Carbon 14?

O.o If you are refering to carbon dating - the difference between carbon-12 and carbon-14 at death is the same in all living things - carbon-12 however doesn't decay like carbon-14 does and it's the ratio of carbon-14 decay to carbon-12 that is the determinant of age.


There is no way anything could preserve a red blood vessel from 10's of millions of years. It's impossible. I believe in must have died after the flood. Dinosaurs were accepted onto Noahs Ark and it dies maybe a 100 years ago at the max?

I have already shown why carbon dating is flawed and untrustedworthly. Hay ho, oh well.
Puck
Posts: 6,457
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 1:01:43 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/17/2009 12:51:01 AM, GodSands wrote:

There is no way anything could preserve a red blood vessel from 10's of millions of years. It's impossible.

Unfortunately for you - wishful thinking does not dictate reality.

I have already shown why carbon dating is flawed and untrustedworthly. Hay ho, oh well.

Erm, no you didn't.
MistahKurtz
Posts: 400
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 8:57:14 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/17/2009 12:51:01 AM, GodSands wrote:
There is no way anything could preserve a red blood vessel from 10's of millions of years. It's impossible. I believe in must have died after the flood. Dinosaurs were accepted onto Noahs Ark and it dies maybe a 100 years ago at the max?

I have already shown why carbon dating is flawed and untrustedworthly. Hay ho, oh well.

Excuse me, can I have some science with that, please?
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 9:32:08 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/17/2009 12:51:01 AM, GodSands wrote:
There is no way anything could preserve a red blood vessel from 10's of millions of years. It's impossible. I believe in must have died after the flood. Dinosaurs were accepted onto Noahs Ark and it dies maybe a 100 years ago at the max?

Dinosaurs died out in 1909? Wow... wow.. wow. WOW.

"You Can Not Be Serious" (see YouTube video)
MistahKurtz
Posts: 400
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 10:59:37 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/17/2009 9:40:56 AM, NuncConsurgo wrote:
there are mentions of the dinosaurs in the Bible when Noah is loading up the Ark.

Irrefutable proof, right there.
Xer
Posts: 7,776
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/17/2009 11:38:24 AM
Posted: 7 years ago
At 6/17/2009 10:59:37 AM, MistahKurtz wrote:
At 6/17/2009 9:40:56 AM, NuncConsurgo wrote:
there are mentions of the dinosaurs in the Bible when Noah is loading up the Ark.

Irrefutable proof, right there.

There were also talking snakes...

And there are magical wizards in the Harry Potter series... so they must exist!