Total Posts:13|Showing Posts:1-13
Jump to topic:

9/11 was an inside job or wasnt

Blackyblue
Posts: 1
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
11/11/2014 7:40:28 AM
Posted: 3 years ago
Hi, feel free to have a debate on the subject.
However could people choosing to debate, please click on this link, read the material and cast a vote.
2 days now, and still no vote
http://www.debate.org...
TheGhostOfCivilization
Posts: 139
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.
-TheGhostOfCivilization
TheGhostOfCivilization
Posts: 139
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/14/2017 3:15:59 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
For the simple questions being unanswered part I meant to use this photo
http://www.debate.org...
But the other one certainly works too
-TheGhostOfCivilization
fishhunter61
Posts: 239
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/17/2017 4:26:53 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

Why the Hel! are you reviving a post that is 2 years old??????
TheGhostOfCivilization
Posts: 139
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/19/2017 10:17:51 PM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/17/2017 4:26:53 PM, fishhunter61 wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

Why the Hel! are you reviving a post that is 2 years old??????

Well because it was unanswered I wasn't really reviving it, I found it and happened to the the first one to respond to this forum after it went unanswered for 2 years.
-TheGhostOfCivilization
MasonicSlayer
Posts: 3,333
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
4/22/2017 12:37:43 AM
Posted: 1 year ago
At 4/19/2017 10:17:51 PM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
At 4/17/2017 4:26:53 PM, fishhunter61 wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

Why the Hel! are you reviving a post that is 2 years old??????

Well because it was unanswered I wasn't really reviving it, I found it and happened to the the first one to respond to this forum after it went unanswered for 2 years.

So who did it. An inside Job says what? It don't say much when you get to thinking big about it. It's gotta be biblical maybe. Fallen angels driving badass black mustangs with yellow government plates, cuz I seen that shizz all the time if you looking through my rear view mirror like they hard up for me for whatever. Build it up to tear it down yep, what you know about that?
SecularMerlin
Posts: 5,816
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/6/2018 5:38:58 AM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

How could the way the towers fell defy the laws of physics? Are you suggesting that the government can defy the laws of physics?
The only true wisdom lies in knowing that you know nothing.
-Socrates

Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality
-Lewis Carrol
Furyan5
Posts: 1,516
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/6/2018 1:50:53 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 1/6/2018 5:38:58 AM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

How could the way the towers fell defy the laws of physics? Are you suggesting that the government can defy the laws of physics?

He means the towers didn't fall the way a collapsing building falls. They fell the way a demolished building falls.
SecularMerlin
Posts: 5,816
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/6/2018 2:17:59 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 1/6/2018 1:50:53 PM, Furyan5 wrote:
At 1/6/2018 5:38:58 AM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

How could the way the towers fell defy the laws of physics? Are you suggesting that the government can defy the laws of physics?

He means the towers didn't fall the way a collapsing building falls. They fell the way a demolished building falls.

In controlled explosion demolition experts collapse a building from the bottom not the top. Also a conspiracy the likes of which we are discussing would have required amazing organization and my problem with world governments in general and the United States government in particular does not stem from the belief that they are too organized.
The only true wisdom lies in knowing that you know nothing.
-Socrates

Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality
-Lewis Carrol
Furyan5
Posts: 1,516
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/6/2018 2:46:56 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 1/6/2018 2:17:59 PM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 1/6/2018 1:50:53 PM, Furyan5 wrote:
At 1/6/2018 5:38:58 AM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

How could the way the towers fell defy the laws of physics? Are you suggesting that the government can defy the laws of physics?

He means the towers didn't fall the way a collapsing building falls. They fell the way a demolished building falls.

In controlled explosion demolition experts collapse a building from the bottom not the top. Also a conspiracy the likes of which we are discussing would have required amazing organization and my problem with world governments in general and the United States government in particular does not stem from the belief that they are too organized.

Whoa! Down boy. I never said a agree with him. I'm just explaining what he meant by defying the laws of physics. I agree that the government couldn't pull off such a feat. But... inside job doesn't neccesarily imply government involvement. And seriously, what are the odds NORAD would be running a training simulation about a passenger plain being hijacked and flown into a building, on the same day 9/11 occured?
SecularMerlin
Posts: 5,816
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
1/6/2018 2:52:18 PM
Posted: 4 months ago
At 1/6/2018 2:46:56 PM, Furyan5 wrote:
At 1/6/2018 2:17:59 PM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 1/6/2018 1:50:53 PM, Furyan5 wrote:
At 1/6/2018 5:38:58 AM, SecularMerlin wrote:
At 4/14/2017 5:31:03 AM, TheGhostOfCivilization wrote:
It was an inside job. First of all there are so many simple questions that have never been answered to this day:
http://www.debate.org...

Second, many people who were in the WTC buildings recall hearing several more explosions as they were evacuating the building. In fact a bomb can be seen going off in this picture as it was apparently set off "just a hair too early", and the explosion pictured can't possibly be from the airplane's impact.
http://www.debate.org...

Here is evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC, although there is much more evidence for it not mentioned in this photo:
http://www.debate.org...

The way and speed that the towers fell defies both the laws of gravity and the laws of physics along with Newton's laws of motion. The official story simply doesn't add up, which is appropriate because it is not true. 9/11 was just a good excuse to take away our remaining privacy rights with things such as the Patriot Act and would lead to our long wars in the Middle East, such as the Iraq War which was really for oil as countless proof shows.

How could the way the towers fell defy the laws of physics? Are you suggesting that the government can defy the laws of physics?

He means the towers didn't fall the way a collapsing building falls. They fell the way a demolished building falls.

In controlled explosion demolition experts collapse a building from the bottom not the top. Also a conspiracy the likes of which we are discussing would have required amazing organization and my problem with world governments in general and the United States government in particular does not stem from the belief that they are too organized.

Whoa! Down boy. I never said a agree with him. I'm just explaining what he meant by defying the laws of physics. I agree that the government couldn't pull off such a feat. But... inside job doesn't neccesarily imply government involvement. And seriously, what are the odds NORAD would be running a training simulation about a passenger plain being hijacked and flown into a building, on the same day 9/11 occured?

Sorry I was responding to thegostofcivilization. I hope they see the post. I'm going to look up this norad thing however.
The only true wisdom lies in knowing that you know nothing.
-Socrates

Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality
-Lewis Carrol