Total Posts:244|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

KFOURNIER'S Mafia - Day Phase 3

KRFournier
Posts: 690
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:06:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Alive

1. theLwerd
2. Vi_Veri
4. DontBeRacist
6. Hurstman
7. Ournamestoolong
8. Ibap
9. Rezzealaux
11. alex_hanson911
12. studentathletechristian8
13. xxdarkxx
14. mongeese
15. wjmelements
18. OreEle
19. Korashk
20. Clockwork
21. SportsGuru
23. Lukas

Deceased

1. Puck - Town - Killed by mafia on Night Phase 1.

2. mongoose - Mafia Prostitute - Lynched on Day Phase 1.

3. Koopin - Town - Killed by moderator on Day Phase 1 for violating rule #5.

4. Zetsubou - Town - Killed by vigilante on Night Phase 2.

5. feverish - Town - Lynched on Day Phase 2.

6. JBlake - Town Tracker - Killed by vigilante on Night Phase 3.

7. oceanix - Town - Killed by mafia on Night Phase 3.

Notes

The politician forced alex_hanson911 to vote for himself.

Initial Vote Count

alex_hanson911 (alex_hanson911) -- 1/9 needed to lynch.
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:23:43 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
So let us get the discussion going.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
studentathletechristian8
Posts: 5,810
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:39:33 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 4:23:43 PM, Korashk wrote:
So let us get the discussion going.

All right. Sucks that a lot of townie were killed and only one mafia lost his life.
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:41:26 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Who the hell is our vigilante and why did he kill Jblake? If your reading this, PLEASE have a reason for killing the people you do, so far your 0-2 and youve killed our tracker. Fail
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:43:06 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
For the record by my last post i didn't actually mean for the vigilante to say who he/she is.
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
mongeese
Posts: 5,387
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:45:28 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Okay, the result of my most recent investigation: theLwerd is guilty. I just hope the Framer isn't one step ahead of me again, but...

VOTE THELWERD
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:49:01 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 4:45:28 PM, mongeese wrote:
Okay, the result of my most recent investigation: theLwerd is guilty. I just hope the Framer isn't one step ahead of me again, but...

VOTE THELWERD

I'm thinking that we should wait for some defense instead of jumping the gun again.

My sentiments about the vigilante mirror alex's. At forst I was thinking that the vigilante was of the overzealous variety but he/she didn't kill anyone in the first night phase.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 4:51:19 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 4:49:01 PM, Korashk wrote:
At 5/26/2010 4:45:28 PM, mongeese wrote:
Okay, the result of my most recent investigation: theLwerd is guilty. I just hope the Framer isn't one step ahead of me again, but...

VOTE THELWERD

I'm thinking that we should wait for some defense instead of jumping the gun again.

My sentiments about the vigilante mirror alex's. At forst I was thinking that the vigilante was of the overzealous variety but he/she didn't kill anyone in the first night phase.

Could also just have missed the deadline on the first night. I don't want to jump to a lynch on lwerd just because of last day phase, i don't want the same thing to happen again. But we will see
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:14:16 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
What's with the politician?
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:15:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 5:14:16 PM, Korashk wrote:
What's with the politician?

I don't think there's much method to what he/she is doing.
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
Ibap
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:33:57 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 4:45:28 PM, mongeese wrote:
Okay, the result of my most recent investigation: theLwerd is guilty. I just hope the Framer isn't one step ahead of me again, but...

VOTE THELWERD

I'm probably just typing out what most of you have already thought, but I wanted to right out my thoughts, and I don't want to be seen as inactive after completely missing the last round until after it was over. :)

The way I see it, there are a few possibilities for what's happening.

A. theLwerd is guilty
B. theLwerd was framed
C. mongeese is lying (and mafia)

If C were true, and we lynched L and she turned up innocent, we'd probably end up lynching mongeese. That would mean that he'd have sacrificed two mafia to kill two townies... which seems like it would be pretty stupid since we started out with twice as many people as they did.

That would leave A and B; and while obviously it's less likely that mongeese and the framer would pick the same person, the framer might have anticipated whatever reasoning mongeese used to pick her (although I don't really remember anything in particular making her very suspicious?).

As has been said, I feel like we should at least wait for her defense, especially after last round.
Ibap
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:35:54 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 5:33:57 PM, Ibap wrote:
At 5/26/2010 4:45:28 PM, mongeese wrote:
Okay, the result of my most recent investigation: theLwerd is guilty. I just hope the Framer isn't one step ahead of me again, but...

VOTE THELWERD

I wanted to right out my thoughts

Ew... Write* >.<
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:41:00 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
L is a fairly common early-game target. While the straight up chance of a Cop-Framer target is low this has to be taken into account.

She'll post her defense once she logs on.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
ournamestoolong
Posts: 1,059
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 5:54:58 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 5:41:00 PM, Korashk wrote:
L is a fairly common early-game target. While the straight up chance of a Cop-Framer target is low this has to be taken into account.

She'll post her defense once she logs on.

I concur.
I'll get by with a little help from my friends.

Ournamestoolong

Secretary of Commerce

Destroy talking ads!
Alex
Posts: 2,058
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 6:35:41 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Case for Lwerd.

1. She was investigated guilty
2. She advised a lynch against zet on dp 1 simply because he's dumb "town or not"

"But why would the entire mafia add him just because he was mafia with them? The only person who would need to be friends with him is KRF. Nevertheless going with one of those people gives us SOMETHING to go on (instead of RNG, which I don't like). If that's the case why not go for Lukas himself?"

She was kind of defending the whole adding of friends thing, but then again she was on the other side later, so it's hard to say there.

Anyways i'm off to youth those are my thoughts so far.
Why kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
Clockwork
Posts: 349
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 7:15:48 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Two towies gettig fraed two ights i a row s alost statistially ipossile OTE TO LYH LW utill she gies us a good reaso ot to (still eed to get a ew keyoard)
Felonial Disenfranchisement: http://www.debate.org...
Poverty v. Environmental Protection: http://www.debate.org...
On God and Free Will: http://www.debate.org...
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 7:22:31 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 7:15:48 PM, Clockwork wrote:
Two towies gettig fraed two ights i a row s alost statistially ipossile OTE TO LYH LW utill she gies us a good reaso ot to (still eed to get a ew keyoard)

This is really funny to read, but I think that if your entire numpad works you should type the letters that don't work using alt-codes.

http://www.alt-codes.net...

Use the left Alt key and the numpad numbers to make them. Unless your Alt key is broken, in which case you're screwed.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown
Clockwork
Posts: 349
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 7:27:11 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 7:22:31 PM, Korashk wrote:
At 5/26/2010 7:15:48 PM, Clockwork wrote:
Two towies gettig fraed two ights i a row s alost statistially ipossile OTE TO LYH LW utill she gies us a good reaso ot to (still eed to get a ew keyoard)

This is really funny to read, but I think that if your entire numpad works you should type the letters that don't work using alt-codes.

http://www.alt-codes.net...

Use the left Alt key and the numpad numbers to make them. Unless your Alt key is broken, in which case you're screwed.

o luk it just types regular digits
Felonial Disenfranchisement: http://www.debate.org...
Poverty v. Environmental Protection: http://www.debate.org...
On God and Free Will: http://www.debate.org...
Clockwork
Posts: 349
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 7:34:30 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 7:28:39 PM, studentathletechristian8 wrote:
Now we're going guilty until proven innocent?

/run >onscreen keyboard<

She's very likely guilty, seeing as the cop has, well, a guilty on her. I'll unvote her if she has a decent reason why I should, but the chances of two successive investigations being framed is very, very unlikely.
Felonial Disenfranchisement: http://www.debate.org...
Poverty v. Environmental Protection: http://www.debate.org...
On God and Free Will: http://www.debate.org...
wjmelements
Posts: 8,206
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 7:35:21 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Geese isn't mafia, or he would have been cc'd a long time ago.

Like last time, it is unlikely that theLwerd was framed. Also, if she was town, we'd be doing a little better.

So... VTL Lwerd
in the blink of an eye you finally see the light
Ibap
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 8:05:36 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 7:34:30 PM, Clockwork wrote:
/run >onscreen keyboard<

She's very likely guilty, seeing as the cop has, well, a guilty on her. I'll unvote her if she has a decent reason why I should, but the chances of two successive investigations being framed is very, very unlikely.

I just thought I should point out that the chance of her being framed tonight isn't at all lower because someone was framed last night, since the chance of last night's frame happening is now 100% (assuming mongeese isn't mafia, and I think most of us agree he probably isn't). :)

And the framer would have been trying to anticipate mongeese's choice, not just randomly choosing, which makes it a little less unlikely that she was framed.

Of course, I'd say there is probably more against her than for her right now... but I still don't think it's clear-cut enough for us to lynch her before she gets a word in.
Ibap
Posts: 91
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 8:09:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
At 5/26/2010 8:05:36 PM, Ibap wrote:
I just thought I should point out that the chance of her being framed last night isn't at all lower because someone was framed the night before last, since the chance of last night's frame happening is now 100% (assuming mongeese isn't mafia, and I think most of us agree he probably isn't). :)

Fix'd.
I apparently have a knack for noticing mistakes in my posts a minute after making them.
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 8:46:44 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
VOTE TO LYNCH LWERD

The odds are against Mon being framed twice and it is a pretty safe bet.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Ore_Ele
Posts: 25,980
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 8:51:03 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Of course if someone can offer a logical reasoning to defend her, I'm all ears.
"Wanting Red Rhino Pill to have gender"
Korashk
Posts: 4,597
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/26/2010 9:07:48 PM
Posted: 6 years ago
Lynch theLwerd

Two frames in a row is unlikely, no matter how often L is targeted early on.
When large numbers of otherwise-law abiding people break specific laws en masse, it's usually a fault that lies with the law. - Unknown